How Do
How Do

How Do

Are
Are

Are

Whats Your Religion
Whats Your Religion

Whats Your Religion

Are You Religious
Are You Religious

Are You Religious

Shitheadsteve
Shitheadsteve

Shitheadsteve

Your
Your

Your

The
The

The

Do You Want
Do You Want

Do You Want

Not
Not

Not

I Will
I Will

I Will

🔥 | Latest

Your Religion: anarchy404x 1d You must understand the weird logic of the left. To them life is priceless and should always be prioritised over property. They would literally let the statue of Liberty burn to save one person. Through inaction let one person starve? You monster, you literally murdered them. Reply Vote tsunderepup: randomslasher: pastel-selkie: lesbianshepard: stupid leftists and their belief in *checks notes* the intrinsic value of human life Reblog if you would burn down the statue of liberty to save a life Here’s the thing, though. If you asked a conservative “Would you let the statue of liberty burn to save one life?” they’d probably scoff and say no, it’s a national landmark, a treasure, a piece of too much historical importance to let it be destroyed for the sake of one measly life.  But if you asked, “Would you let the statue of liberty burn in order to save your child? your spouse? someone you loved a great deal?” the tune abruptly changes. At the very least, there’s a hesitation. Even if they deny it, I’m willing to bet that gun to their head, the answer would be “yes.”   The basic problem here is that people have a hard time seeing outside their own sphere of influence, and empathizing beyond the few people who are right in front of them. You’ve got your immediate family, whom you love; your friends, your acquaintances, maybe to a certain degree the people who share a status with you (your religion, your race, etc.)–but beyond that? People aren’t real. They’re theoretical.  But a national monument? That’s real. It stands for something. The value of a non-realized anonymous life that exists completely outside your sphere of influence is clearly worth less than something that represents freedom and prosperity to a whole nation, right? People who think like this lack the compassion to realize that everyone is in someone’s immediate sphere of influence–that everyone is someone’s lover, or brother, or parent. Everyone means the world to someone. And it’s the absolute height of selfishness to assume that their lives don’t have value just because they don’t mean the world to you.  P.S. I would let the statue of liberty burn to save a pigeon. 
Your Religion: anarchy404x 1d
 You must understand the weird logic of the left. To
 them life is priceless and should always be
 prioritised over property. They would literally let the
 statue of Liberty burn to save one person. Through
 inaction let one person starve? You monster, you
 literally murdered them.
 Reply Vote
tsunderepup:
randomslasher:

pastel-selkie:

lesbianshepard:
stupid leftists and their belief in *checks notes* the intrinsic value of human life

Reblog if you would burn down the statue of liberty to save a life

Here’s the thing, though. If you asked a conservative “Would you let the statue of liberty burn to save one life?” they’d probably scoff and say no, it’s a national landmark, a treasure, a piece of too much historical importance to let it be destroyed for the sake of one measly life. 
But if you asked, “Would you let the statue of liberty burn in order to save your child? your spouse? someone you loved a great deal?” the tune abruptly changes. At the very least, there’s a hesitation. Even if they deny it, I’m willing to bet that gun to their head, the answer would be “yes.”  
The basic problem here is that people have a hard time seeing outside their own sphere of influence, and empathizing beyond the few people who are right in front of them. You’ve got your immediate family, whom you love; your friends, your acquaintances, maybe to a certain degree the people who share a status with you (your religion, your race, etc.)–but beyond that? People aren’t real. They’re theoretical. 
But a national monument? That’s real. It stands for something. The value of a non-realized anonymous life that exists completely outside your sphere of influence is clearly worth less than something that represents freedom and prosperity to a whole nation, right?
People who think like this lack the compassion to realize that everyone is in someone’s immediate sphere of influence–that everyone is someone’s lover, or brother, or parent. Everyone means the world to someone. And it’s the absolute height of selfishness to assume that their lives don’t have value just because they don’t mean the world to you. 
P.S. I would let the statue of liberty burn to save a pigeon. 

tsunderepup: randomslasher: pastel-selkie: lesbianshepard: stupid leftists and their belief in *checks notes* the intrinsic value of hu...

Your Religion: Uch re Me M a ainst the MR and won e jwst beuse it OPFENDS you what is the wond Comig ? you cawt fof dl jdlu ISTM SALE HERE Um いve MERRY qsy-complains-a-lot: dollsahoy: nirtonic: lordofdarkshadows: chocolatesprinklesroyale: cannibalcoalition: leebradford: Flashbacks from The War.  I’m reblogging this because I just saw someone use the word ‘globalist’ in the comments, so it looks like I’m pissing off the right people.  It isn’t a war on Christmas if you’re still allowed to celebrate it. Just remember that your religion isn’t the only one celebrating a holiday. I think the war is on saying merry Christmas as there are some people that want to do away with the word, including replacing Christmas vacation with holiday break, merry Christmas with Happy Holidays and so on. there’s even an ad that pops up, once in a while, on youtube that covers this. . There is no war dude. Christianity is not the only religion with a holiday at this time of the year. Christians are not the only people on the us. There is no harm in folks taking a step back from this christian hyperfocus, litterally 0 harm. My Dad, living in an intensely Christian area, would say Happy Holidays, and when people would protest, he’d gleefully say “What about New Year?” to point out that even Christians celebrate multiple holidays this time of year. We’ve been saying Happy Holidays for decades in France just to cover Christmas and the New Year, so as far as I’m concerned this is a complete non-issue.
Your Religion: Uch
 re Me
 M a
 ainst the
 MR
 and won e
 jwst beuse it
 OPFENDS you
 what is the wond
 Comig ? you cawt
 fof
 dl jdlu
 ISTM
 SALE
 HERE
 Um
 いve
 MERRY
qsy-complains-a-lot:
dollsahoy:

nirtonic:

lordofdarkshadows:


chocolatesprinklesroyale:

cannibalcoalition:

leebradford:
Flashbacks from The War. 
I’m reblogging this because I just saw someone use the word ‘globalist’ in the comments, so it looks like I’m pissing off the right people. 

It isn’t a war on Christmas if you’re still allowed to celebrate it.
Just remember that your religion isn’t the only one celebrating a holiday.

I think the war is on saying merry Christmas as there are some people that want to do away with the word, including replacing Christmas vacation with holiday break, merry Christmas with Happy Holidays and so on. there’s even an ad that pops up, once in a while, on youtube that covers this. .


There is no war dude.  Christianity is not the only religion  with a holiday at this time of the year.  Christians are not the only people on the us. There is no harm in folks taking a step back from this christian hyperfocus, litterally 0 harm. 

My Dad, living in an intensely Christian area, would say Happy Holidays, and when people would protest, he’d gleefully say “What about New Year?” to point out that even Christians celebrate multiple holidays this time of year.

We’ve been saying Happy Holidays for decades in France just to cover Christmas and the New Year, so as far as I’m concerned this is a complete non-issue.

qsy-complains-a-lot: dollsahoy: nirtonic: lordofdarkshadows: chocolatesprinklesroyale: cannibalcoalition: leebradford: Flashbacks f...