Process
Process

Process

Icecream
Icecream

Icecream

Todays
Todays

Todays

processing
 processing

processing

hawke
 hawke

hawke

hawk
 hawk

hawk

thoughts
 thoughts

thoughts

ifs
ifs

ifs

artistic
artistic

artistic

my friend
my friend

my friend

🔥 | Latest

thought process: Their thought process is a complete mystery
 thought process: Their thought process is a complete mystery

Their thought process is a complete mystery

thought process: Jason Fuller, Contributor Working to bring about the best in America, both on-line and off. Impeachment Is No Longer Enough; Donald Trump Must Face Justice Impeachment and removal from office are only the first steps; for treason and-if convicted in a court of law-executed. 06/11/2017 10:39 pm ET for America to be redeemed, Donald Trump must be prosecuted Donald Trump has been President of the United States for just shy of six months now. I think that most of us among the electorate knew that his presidency would be a relative disaster, but I am not sure how many among us expected the catastrophe our nation now faces. friendly-neighborhood-patriarch: hominishostilis: abstractandedgyname: siryouarebeingmocked: mississpithy: bogleech: notyourmoderate: angrybell: thinksquad: http://archive.is/5VvI5 Huffpo, everybody. Can someone tell me what high crime or misdemeanor Trump has committed that merits this? Or is the HuffPo just publishing outright fantasies? God dammit, I’m now in the position of defending Huffington. I didn’t want to be here. Okay, @angrybell … actually, @ literally everyone who reblogged this uncritically as a tacit endorsement and agreement. Such as @the-critical-feminist that I reblog this from.My first question has to be: are you serious? Don’t read that with a tone, don’t read that as an attack. That’s my first question: Are you asking a serious question about what high crimes or misdemeanors Trump has perpetrated? Are you asking a sincere question or is this the sort of rhetoric that doesn’t translate well into text? And, if you are actually asking this question, are ou going to hear the answer or are you going to immediately start concocting your counter-argument because you just know in your heart that anyone who disagrees with you must be wrong, so you start formulating a plan to prove them wrong before you actually hear what they have to say?Next: did you read the article that was posted in the link you responded to? Because the author of that article does a reasonable job of explaining their thought process behind the headline. Or did you lash out before you read the article? Okay, presuming that you did read the article in good faith, evaluate its points, perform the follow-up research to understand context, and still disagree with the central tenets and simply believe that the author’s reasoning does not hold up for whatever reasons you have chosen not to state, and you believe their source information is falsified for whatever reason you have chosen not to state, I will move on. After I have given you and yours every conceivable benefit of the doubt and every charitable assumption. Because if the article itself doesn’t convince you, there’s the fact that Donald Trump has broken literally every federal law against corruption and conflict of interest. Not one or two, not most, not all but a few. Literally every single law we have against corruption, from the Constitution to the informal guidelines circulated as a memo from the White House ethics scholars. He’s broken literally every one of those rules. He’s openly traded favors for money and favors for months now. Hell, that Chinese influence-peddler that paid him off for sixteen million dollars should have been enough to get him convicted of treason. Sharing code-word level classified information with a government on the opposite side of an ongoing military conflict isn’t *necessarily* treason, unless the information was part of a share program with an allied nation and wasn’t his to distribute. That’s aiding a foreign aggressor at the expense of a military ally, and that’s treason. Giving aid and comfort to enemies of the nation. Obstruction of justice is pretty clear-cut, that’s an impeachment, except that the justice in question is also a matter of national security, so that’s treason. Again. Defaming the former president? Misdemeanor, impeachable. The way he drags his heels nominating posts in Justice and State could be prosecuted as dereliction of duty. If he has tapes of Comey, he’s on the hook for contempt, if he doesn’t then he’s on the hook for witness tampering. Hell, deleting the covfefe tweet is destroying federal records, which is a misdemeanor, and impeachable. The man doesn’t go a week without bringing on an impeachable offense. Strictly speaking, every time he goes to Mar-A-Lago he’s committing grand larceny by fraud, because he’s taking millions of dollars of American funds for his own benefit, after promising not to do that. There are dozens, hundreds maybe, of impeachable offenses already in this 140 days, “high crimes and misdemeanors”. Actual counts of treason, punishable by death by hanging, is probably only five or six counts. Only five or six counts of high treason by our sitting president. His job does not put him above reproach. His job is to *be* above reproach. And he’s failing that job. Trump’s supporters probably believe he’s done nothing impeachable or treasonous because they spent eight years claiming on no grounds whatsoever that Obama was impeachable and treasonous, just because they didn’t like him. They now probably convince themselves that these facts about Trump are as fake as their Obama theories and they’ve ruined the gravity of these terms for themselves. “ His job does not put him above reproach. His job is to *be* above reproach. And he’s failing that job. “ I like how Bogleech doesn’t know many Trump supporters are former Obama supporters. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/04/us/obama-trump-swing-voters.html https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/10/16/17980820/trump-obama-2016-race-racism-class-economy-2018-midterm https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obama-Trump_voters It’s not even a secret. But why am I not surprised bogleech - that intellectual titan - failed to do basic research? And last time I checked, no nation required their politicans to be perfect. Which is what NYM is asking for with that quote; perfection. That’s what ‘above reproach’ means. An impossible standard, considering people “reproach” Trump for feeding fish wrong, for his skin color, for any and every little thing, even if they have to twist reality into a pretzel to do it. In fact, I’ve seen people take pictures of kids in cages from 2014, and blame Trump for it. So this: Are you asking a serious question about what high crimes or misdemeanors Trump has perpetrated? Is a question of this: Can someone tell me what high crime or misdemeanor Trump has committed that merits this? Seems you missed the part that says “merits this”. Next: did you read the article that was posted in the link you responded to? Because the author of that article does a reasonable job of explaining their thought process behind the headline. Or did you lash out before you read the article? (The underlined is in the subtitle, not the headline.) Okay, presuming that you did read the article in good faith, evaluate its points, perform the follow-up research to understand context, and still disagree with the central tenets… Context? Central tenets? Do you not know how highlighting works? You don’t need to know the context, or any other point, when you’re indicating a specific, explicit, and isolated quality. The subtitle called for Trump’s execution, we’re 5 paragraphs in and you haven’t even acknowledged that part yet. Or at all, I’m guessing, because I’m not reading further. You keep talking around it. You accuse others, preemptively, of not hearing the answer and pre-”concocting” a response, and yet you’re waffling on about shit around the one, sole, isolated thing that was indicated in the first place. This isn’t about ignoring context, this is about criticising one thing. Which is a thing people are allowed to do, by the way, just because people criticise one thing, doesn’t mean they’re criticising everything about the everyone involved, and everything said before, adjacent to, and after that one thing, and therefore are required to include all of those things in their consideration and assessment of this one thing. The specific criticism of the indicated quality is the advocation of Trump’s execution. That’s it. No context is needed to understand that this is what was said, especially since that which was said, which is being criticised, is explicit. No amount of, “So, click-bait subtitle that you don’t see until you’ve already clicked on the article link out of the way, here’s what I actually meant when I said I wanted this person tried and executed,” could excuse the use of that language, let alone actually believing in it. It’s like… it’s like if someone makes a typo, someone else is like, “Oh, seems you made a typo,” you’d jump in like, “But what about they’re perfectly reasonable spelling everywhere else? Hm? Forced to ignore contextual perfect spelling I see. They’re lack of typos everywhere else explains this typo, and vindicates it”. You and what’s his face, James, fuckin ReasonAndEmpathy or whatever now, y’all keep saying “but what of the context?” when the criterion of criticism is isolated, atomic, specific, and/or explicit. No amount of context invalidates the very specific, singular words explicitly spoken. “Sure he called for Trump to be executed, but he explains himself.” Fucking and? When did the death sentence become ok? When did that happen? Moderates are ok with the death sentence now? Aight, weird. Man this fucking post aged like fine wine, take a SIP Delicious This was quite a ride
 thought process: Jason Fuller, Contributor
 Working to bring about the best in America, both on-line and off.
 Impeachment Is No Longer Enough;
 Donald Trump Must Face Justice
 Impeachment and removal from office are only the first steps;
 for treason and-if convicted in a court of law-executed.
 06/11/2017 10:39 pm ET
 for America to be redeemed, Donald Trump must be prosecuted
 Donald Trump has been President of the United States for just shy of six months now. I
 think that most of us among the electorate knew that his presidency would be a relative
 disaster, but I am not sure how many among us expected the catastrophe our nation now
 faces.
friendly-neighborhood-patriarch:

hominishostilis:

abstractandedgyname:
siryouarebeingmocked:

mississpithy:

bogleech:

notyourmoderate:

angrybell:

thinksquad:


http://archive.is/5VvI5


Huffpo, everybody. 




Can someone tell me what high crime or misdemeanor Trump has committed that merits this? Or is the HuffPo just publishing outright fantasies?

God dammit, I’m now in the position of defending Huffington. I didn’t want to be here. Okay, @angrybell … actually, @ literally everyone who reblogged this uncritically as a tacit endorsement and agreement. Such as @the-critical-feminist that I reblog this from.My first question has to be: are you serious? Don’t read that with a tone, don’t read that as an attack. That’s my first question: Are you asking a serious question about what high crimes or misdemeanors Trump has perpetrated? Are you asking a sincere question or is this the sort of rhetoric that doesn’t translate well into text? And, if you are actually asking this question, are ou going to hear the answer or are you going to immediately start concocting your counter-argument because you just know in your heart that anyone who disagrees with you must be wrong, so you start formulating a plan to prove them wrong before you actually hear what they have to say?Next: did you read the article that was posted in the link you responded to? Because the author of that article does a reasonable job of explaining their thought process behind the headline. Or did you lash out before you read the article? Okay, presuming that you did read the article in good faith, evaluate its points, perform the follow-up research to understand context, and still disagree with the central tenets and simply believe that the author’s reasoning does not hold up for whatever reasons you have chosen not to state, and you believe their source information is falsified for whatever reason you have chosen not to state, I will move on. After I have given you and yours every conceivable benefit of the doubt and every charitable assumption. Because if the article itself doesn’t convince you, there’s the fact that Donald Trump has broken literally every federal law against corruption and conflict of interest. Not one or two, not most, not all but a few. Literally every single law we have against corruption, from the Constitution to the informal guidelines circulated as a memo from the White House ethics scholars. He’s broken literally every one of those rules. He’s openly traded favors for money and favors for months now. Hell, that Chinese influence-peddler that paid him off for sixteen million dollars should have been enough to get him convicted of treason. Sharing code-word level classified information with a government on the opposite side of an ongoing military conflict isn’t *necessarily* treason, unless the information was part of a share program with an allied nation and wasn’t his to distribute. That’s aiding a foreign aggressor at the expense of a military ally, and that’s treason. Giving aid and comfort to enemies of the nation. Obstruction of justice is pretty clear-cut, that’s an impeachment, except that the justice in question is also a matter of national security, so that’s treason. Again. Defaming the former president? Misdemeanor, impeachable. The way he drags his heels nominating posts in Justice and State could be prosecuted as dereliction of duty. If he has tapes of Comey, he’s on the hook for contempt, if he doesn’t then he’s on the hook for witness tampering. Hell, deleting the covfefe tweet is destroying federal records, which is a misdemeanor, and impeachable. The man doesn’t go a week without bringing on an impeachable offense. Strictly speaking, every time he goes to Mar-A-Lago he’s committing grand larceny by fraud, because he’s taking millions of dollars of American funds for his own benefit, after promising not to do that. There are dozens, hundreds maybe, of impeachable offenses already in this 140 days, “high crimes and misdemeanors”. Actual counts of treason, punishable by death by hanging, is probably only five or six counts. Only five or six counts of high treason by our sitting president. His job does not put him above reproach. His job is to *be* above reproach. And he’s failing that job. 

Trump’s supporters probably believe he’s done nothing impeachable or treasonous because they spent eight years claiming on no grounds whatsoever that Obama was impeachable and treasonous, just because they didn’t like him. They now probably convince themselves that these facts about Trump are as fake as their Obama theories and they’ve ruined the gravity of these terms for themselves.





“

His job does not put him above reproach. His job is to *be* above reproach. And he’s failing that job.


“






I like how Bogleech doesn’t know many Trump supporters are former Obama supporters.
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/04/us/obama-trump-swing-voters.html
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/10/16/17980820/trump-obama-2016-race-racism-class-economy-2018-midterm
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obama-Trump_voters
It’s not even a secret. But why am I not surprised bogleech - that intellectual titan - failed to do basic research?
And last time I checked, no nation required their politicans to be perfect. Which is what NYM is asking for with that quote; perfection. That’s what ‘above reproach’ means. An impossible standard, considering people “reproach” Trump for feeding fish wrong, for his skin color, for any and every little thing, even if they have to twist reality into a pretzel to do it. In fact, I’ve seen people take pictures of kids in cages from 2014, and blame Trump for it.

So this:


Are you asking a serious question about what high crimes or misdemeanors Trump has perpetrated?


Is a question of this:


Can someone tell me what high crime or misdemeanor Trump has committed that merits this?


Seems you missed the part that says “merits this”.


Next: did you read the article that was posted in the link you responded to? Because the author of that article does a reasonable job of explaining their thought process behind the headline. Or did you lash out before you read the article? 


(The underlined is in the subtitle, not the headline.)


Okay, presuming that you did read the article in good faith, evaluate its points, perform the follow-up research to understand context, and still disagree with the central tenets…
Context? Central tenets? Do you not know how highlighting works? You don’t need to know the context, or any other point, when you’re indicating a specific, explicit, and isolated quality.
The subtitle called for Trump’s execution, we’re 5 paragraphs in and you haven’t even acknowledged that part yet. Or at all, I’m guessing, because I’m not reading further. You keep talking around it. You accuse others, preemptively, of not hearing the answer and pre-”concocting” a response, and yet you’re waffling on about shit around the one, sole, isolated thing that was indicated in the first place.
This isn’t about ignoring context, this is about criticising one thing. Which is a thing people are allowed to do, by the way, just because people criticise one thing, doesn’t mean they’re criticising everything about the everyone involved, and everything said before, adjacent to, and after that one thing, and therefore are required to include all of those things in their consideration and assessment of this one thing.
The specific criticism of the indicated quality is the advocation of Trump’s execution. That’s it. No context is needed to understand that this is what was said, especially since that which was said, which is being criticised, is explicit. No amount of, “So, click-bait subtitle that you don’t see until you’ve already clicked on the article link out of the way, here’s what I actually meant when I said I wanted this person tried and executed,” could excuse the use of that language, let alone actually believing in it.
It’s like… it’s like if someone makes a typo, someone else is like, “Oh, seems you made a typo,” you’d jump in like, “But what about they’re perfectly reasonable spelling everywhere else? Hm? Forced to ignore contextual perfect spelling I see. They’re lack of typos everywhere else explains this typo, and vindicates it”.
You and what’s his face, James, fuckin ReasonAndEmpathy or whatever now, y’all keep saying “but what of the context?” when the criterion of criticism is isolated, atomic, specific, and/or explicit. No amount of context invalidates the very specific, singular words explicitly spoken. “Sure he called for Trump to be executed, but he explains himself.” Fucking and? When did the death sentence become ok? When did that happen? Moderates are ok with the death sentence now? Aight, weird.


Man this fucking post aged like fine wine, take a SIP 

Delicious

This was quite a ride

friendly-neighborhood-patriarch: hominishostilis: abstractandedgyname: siryouarebeingmocked: mississpithy: bogleech: notyourmoderate...

thought process: angelbabyspice: 11thsense: A representation of my thought process at all times this is literally how teenagers talk irl
 thought process: angelbabyspice:
11thsense:
A representation of my thought process at all times
this is literally how teenagers talk irl

angelbabyspice: 11thsense: A representation of my thought process at all times this is literally how teenagers talk irl

thought process: 00 -21 :56 Tanai Benard Friday at 9:12 AM My 5th grader and I were conversing on the way to work/school this morning. As an educator, I wanted to be sure he and his classmates were taking the school safety drills seriously and not using it as a time to socialize and goof off Me: Have you guys praticed a lockdown drill in class yet? Dez: Are you talking about an active shooter drill? Me: Yes Dez: Yes, we practiced it Me: So tell me what you are suppose to Dez: The teacher is suppose to shu lock the door, put the black paper oVe 00 -21:57 Dez: The teacher is suppose to shut and lock the door, put the black paper over the window on the door. Then myself and three other boys are suppose to push the table against the door After that all the class is going to stand behind us on the back wall Me: The class is suppose to stand behind who? Dez: Me and the other 3 boys. We stand at the front and they get behind us. internally went from 0 to 100 real quick. My child is one of only 2 black children in a class of 23. Being transparent, I immediately went to the "why is my black son being put on the front line?" (Just being real) So I asked before I verbally stated my thoughts' Tanai Benard 00 -21:57 Tanai Benard Friday at 9:12 AM Me: Why did you get picked to stand in front of everyone else if a shooter came in your school? Dez: I didn't get picked. I volunteered to push the table and protect my friends Me: 65 *immediate nausea * Dez why would you volunteer to do that? Dez: If it came down to it I would rather be the one that died protecting my friends then have an entire class die and I be the only one that lived Father God, it took everything out of me not to breakdown. I still have a lump in my throat. 10 damn years old and this has to be our babies thought process in America 00 -21:57 Mop Dolly Spins A e Your Spin Mop Bucket Without Bending 35 BLow BELOW COPPER Noung Black theambassadorposts Read this and try not to cry This is horrifying.
 thought process: 00
 -21 :56
 Tanai Benard
 Friday at 9:12 AM
 My 5th grader and I were conversing on
 the way to work/school this morning. As
 an educator, I wanted to be sure he and
 his classmates were taking the school
 safety drills seriously and not using it as
 a time to socialize and goof off
 Me: Have you guys praticed a lockdown
 drill in class yet?
 Dez: Are you talking about an active
 shooter drill?
 Me: Yes
 Dez: Yes, we practiced it
 Me: So tell me what you are suppose to
 Dez: The teacher is suppose to shu
 lock the door, put the black paper oVe

 00
 -21:57
 Dez: The teacher is suppose to shut and
 lock the door, put the black paper over
 the window on the door.
 Then myself and three other boys are
 suppose to push the table against the
 door
 After that all the class is going to stand
 behind us on the back wall
 Me: The class is suppose to stand
 behind who?
 Dez: Me and the other 3 boys. We stand
 at the front and they get behind us.
 internally went from 0 to 100 real
 quick. My child is one of only 2 black
 children in a class of 23. Being
 transparent, I immediately went to the
 "why is my black son being put on the
 front line?" (Just being real) So I asked
 before I verbally stated my thoughts'
 Tanai Benard

 00
 -21:57
 Tanai Benard
 Friday at 9:12 AM
 Me: Why did you get picked to stand in
 front of everyone else if a shooter came
 in your school?
 Dez: I didn't get picked. I volunteered to
 push the table and protect my friends
 Me: 65 *immediate nausea * Dez why
 would you volunteer to do that?
 Dez: If it came down to it I would rather
 be the one that died protecting my
 friends then have an entire class die and I
 be the only one that lived
 Father God, it took everything out of me
 not to breakdown. I still have a lump in
 my throat. 10 damn years old and this
 has to be our babies thought process in
 America

 00
 -21:57
 Mop Dolly
 Spins A
 e Your Spin Mop Bucket Without Bending
 35 BLow
 BELOW
 COPPER
 Noung
 Black
 theambassadorposts
 Read this and try not to cry
This is horrifying.

This is horrifying.

thought process: angelbabyspice: 11thsense: A representation of my thought process at all times this is literally how teenagers talk irl
 thought process: angelbabyspice:
11thsense:
A representation of my thought process at all times
this is literally how teenagers talk irl

angelbabyspice: 11thsense: A representation of my thought process at all times this is literally how teenagers talk irl

thought process: angelbabyspice: 11thsense: A representation of my thought process at all times this is literally how teenagers talk irl
 thought process: angelbabyspice:
11thsense:
A representation of my thought process at all times
this is literally how teenagers talk irl

angelbabyspice: 11thsense: A representation of my thought process at all times this is literally how teenagers talk irl

thought process: Tanai Benard February 16 at 9:12am My 5th grader and I were conversing on the way to work/school this morning. As an educator, I wanted to be sure he and his classmates were taking the school safety drills seriously and not using it as a time to socialize and goof off Me: Have you guys praticed a lockdown drill in class yet? Dez: Are you talking about an active shooter drill? Me: Yes Dez: Yes, we practiced it Me: So tell me what you are suppose to do. Dez: The teacher is suppose to shut and lock the door, put the black paper over the window on the door Then myself and three other boys are suppose to push the table against the door After that all the class is going to stand behind us on the back wall. Me: The class is suppose to stand behind who? Dez: Me and the other 3 boys. We stand at the front and they get behind us. *I internally went from 0 to 100 real quick. My child is one of only 2 black children in a class of 23. Being transparent, I immediately went to the "why is my black son being put on the front line?" (Just being real) So l asked before I verbally stated my thoughts* Me: Why did you get picked to stand in front of everyone else if a shooter came in your school? Dez: I didn't get picked. I volunteered to push the table and protect my friends Me: 3"immediate nausea Dez why would you volunteer to do that? Dez: If it came down to it I would rather be the one that died protecting my friends then have an entire class die and I be the only one that lived Father God, it took everything out of me not to breakdown. I still have a lump in my throat. 10 damn years old and this has to be our babies thought process in America. Your Spin Mop Bucket Without Bending 35 BiLonm <p>No funny title. Dez is a god-damn hero, but it&rsquo;s simultaneously a god-damn tragedy. (via /r/BlackPeopleTwitter)</p>
 thought process: Tanai Benard
 February 16 at 9:12am
 My 5th grader and I were conversing on the way to work/school this
 morning. As an educator, I wanted to be sure he and his classmates were
 taking the school safety drills seriously and not using it as a time to socialize
 and goof off
 Me: Have you guys praticed a lockdown drill in class yet?
 Dez: Are you talking about an active shooter drill?
 Me: Yes
 Dez: Yes, we practiced it
 Me: So tell me what you are suppose to do.
 Dez: The teacher is suppose to shut and lock the door, put the black paper
 over the window on the door
 Then myself and three other boys are suppose to push the table against the
 door
 After that all the class is going to stand behind us on the back wall.
 Me: The class is suppose to stand behind who?
 Dez: Me and the other 3 boys. We stand at the front and they get behind us.
 *I internally went from 0 to 100 real quick. My child is one of only 2 black
 children in a class of 23. Being transparent, I immediately went to the "why is
 my black son being put on the front line?" (Just being real) So l asked before
 I verbally stated my thoughts*
 Me: Why did you get picked to stand in front of everyone else if a shooter
 came in your school?
 Dez: I didn't get picked. I volunteered to push the table and protect my
 friends
 Me: 3"immediate nausea Dez why would you volunteer to do that?
 Dez: If it came down to it I would rather be the one that died protecting my
 friends then have an entire class die and I be the only one that lived
 Father God, it took everything out of me not to breakdown. I still have a lump
 in my throat. 10 damn years old and this has to be our babies thought
 process in America.
 Your Spin Mop Bucket Without Bending
 35 BiLonm
<p>No funny title. Dez is a god-damn hero, but it&rsquo;s simultaneously a god-damn tragedy. (via /r/BlackPeopleTwitter)</p>

<p>No funny title. Dez is a god-damn hero, but it&rsquo;s simultaneously a god-damn tragedy. (via /r/BlackPeopleTwitter)</p>

thought process: Jay Z Says Trump is a Joke "With All Disrespect" @balleralert Jay Z Says Trump is a Joke “With All Disrespect” – blogged by @MsJennyb (video @bbcradio1) ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ On the heels of the release of his most personal album to date, Jay-Z has been sitting down for interviews to divulge his thought process throughout the making of the highly anticipated album, “4:44.” ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ In his most recent interview with BBC Radio 1 on Friday, JayZ discussed his views on Donald Trump after having campaigned for both BarackObama and HillaryClinton in past elections. As Trump continues to reverse Obama-era legislations, alongside Jeff Sessions, who is eager to reignite the war on drugs, Jay Z shared his thoughts on Trump and the current state of politics. ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ “I believe that we are resilient, especially us as black people and especially the culture. We’ve been through so much more than this guy,” he said. “This guy, I’m looking at him like, man, this is a joke, with all – I can’t even say with all due respect – with all disrespect.” ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ “Until everyone is free, no one is free,” Jay added. “Period. That’s just a fact. We are all linked some kind of way. So if you oppress a certain people, everyone is in danger, karmically and in real life. If I’m being oppressed and you have this big, nice mansion, I’m coming inside there. That’s going to happen, that’s just how life is.” ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ Although the country is struggling with racial injustices and increased hate crimes in the wake of the Donald Trump era, Hov believes it is something that we, as a nation and culture, can overcome. ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ “I don’t think that this is happening if we weren’t prepared to handle it,” he said. “I’m just looking forward to what’s next after that, because usually when things are darkest, then light is on its way. I’m not fearful.”
 thought process: Jay Z Says Trump is a Joke "With
 All Disrespect"
 @balleralert
Jay Z Says Trump is a Joke “With All Disrespect” – blogged by @MsJennyb (video @bbcradio1) ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ On the heels of the release of his most personal album to date, Jay-Z has been sitting down for interviews to divulge his thought process throughout the making of the highly anticipated album, “4:44.” ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ In his most recent interview with BBC Radio 1 on Friday, JayZ discussed his views on Donald Trump after having campaigned for both BarackObama and HillaryClinton in past elections. As Trump continues to reverse Obama-era legislations, alongside Jeff Sessions, who is eager to reignite the war on drugs, Jay Z shared his thoughts on Trump and the current state of politics. ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ “I believe that we are resilient, especially us as black people and especially the culture. We’ve been through so much more than this guy,” he said. “This guy, I’m looking at him like, man, this is a joke, with all – I can’t even say with all due respect – with all disrespect.” ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ “Until everyone is free, no one is free,” Jay added. “Period. That’s just a fact. We are all linked some kind of way. So if you oppress a certain people, everyone is in danger, karmically and in real life. If I’m being oppressed and you have this big, nice mansion, I’m coming inside there. That’s going to happen, that’s just how life is.” ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ Although the country is struggling with racial injustices and increased hate crimes in the wake of the Donald Trump era, Hov believes it is something that we, as a nation and culture, can overcome. ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ “I don’t think that this is happening if we weren’t prepared to handle it,” he said. “I’m just looking forward to what’s next after that, because usually when things are darkest, then light is on its way. I’m not fearful.”

Jay Z Says Trump is a Joke “With All Disrespect” – blogged by @MsJennyb (video @bbcradio1) ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ On the heels of the release of...

thought process: "This little thing? I made it..." @DrSmashlove It's officially baby season and with that said lemme hit y'all with my lil two cents on bebes. I done seen a lot of couples have babies when tings was on the rocks. I don't ever blame couples for this. First - a lot of women will carry a fetus to term regardless of the status of the relationship and this is absolutely her prerogative. If u own a penis and u enter the Punani u gotta understand that regardless what type of birth control is in effect it could be a Bebe nine months later it's 2017 and u men still fail to grasp this and I'm still amazed. U could wear a condom she couple be on IUD and she could take a plan B all combined and if God want y'all to have a Bebe ISS GON HAPPEN BELEE DAT SHIT 🤗😂. Second, a lot of people think that having a baby will fix things. This is called a Band-Aid Baby. From my experience, a baby will give u more of what u have. A baby is an amplifier. Do y'all love the fuck out of each other and adore each other? Then some shitty diapers at 2 am and (God forbid) some health issues and other tests from God won't disrupt that. But if y'all got issues? It's only gon exacerbate the situation. BUT THAT'S NOT HOW PEOPLE THINK 😂. People's thought process is as follows: "I don't fully trust Mike, I can't say I'm happy with him, and he does shit on occasion that drives me FUCKING crazy. Maybe a baby will straighten him out." I agree, baby girl. Maybe it will. Just like maybe u will win the lotto and maybe quit your job and live on a boat...but that's a maybe with a low probability 🤗. More likely, Mike is in no position to be a papa. That said, I know a lot of superwoman single mama's and regardless of their situation with Mike, they've created an incredible home situation for their baby. All I'm saying is if you're considering joining the baby rush, make sure u understand that whatever you've got, you'll have more of it after the baby comes. Bless up 😍
 thought process: "This little thing? I made it..."
 @DrSmashlove
It's officially baby season and with that said lemme hit y'all with my lil two cents on bebes. I done seen a lot of couples have babies when tings was on the rocks. I don't ever blame couples for this. First - a lot of women will carry a fetus to term regardless of the status of the relationship and this is absolutely her prerogative. If u own a penis and u enter the Punani u gotta understand that regardless what type of birth control is in effect it could be a Bebe nine months later it's 2017 and u men still fail to grasp this and I'm still amazed. U could wear a condom she couple be on IUD and she could take a plan B all combined and if God want y'all to have a Bebe ISS GON HAPPEN BELEE DAT SHIT 🤗😂. Second, a lot of people think that having a baby will fix things. This is called a Band-Aid Baby. From my experience, a baby will give u more of what u have. A baby is an amplifier. Do y'all love the fuck out of each other and adore each other? Then some shitty diapers at 2 am and (God forbid) some health issues and other tests from God won't disrupt that. But if y'all got issues? It's only gon exacerbate the situation. BUT THAT'S NOT HOW PEOPLE THINK 😂. People's thought process is as follows: "I don't fully trust Mike, I can't say I'm happy with him, and he does shit on occasion that drives me FUCKING crazy. Maybe a baby will straighten him out." I agree, baby girl. Maybe it will. Just like maybe u will win the lotto and maybe quit your job and live on a boat...but that's a maybe with a low probability 🤗. More likely, Mike is in no position to be a papa. That said, I know a lot of superwoman single mama's and regardless of their situation with Mike, they've created an incredible home situation for their baby. All I'm saying is if you're considering joining the baby rush, make sure u understand that whatever you've got, you'll have more of it after the baby comes. Bless up 😍

It's officially baby season and with that said lemme hit y'all with my lil two cents on bebes. I done seen a lot of couples have babies w...

thought process: Popular on Quora If a person is born deaf, which language do they think in? Michele Westfall, speaks ASL fluently Updated Sep 2 Upvoted by Laura Hale, Disability sport reporter and Ashley Harris, Teacher of the Deaf and I am also Deaf myself. I was born Deaf and have been Deaf my whole life. I do not wear hearing aids or cochlear implants (and have no desire to wear either). I speak American sign language (ASL) and it is my primary language. I am a mother of two born-Deaf children, so our being Deaf is genetic for us. I have a 'voice' in my head, but it is not sound-based. I am a visual being, so in my head, I either see ASL signs, or pictures, or sometimes printed words. My inner voice does have words, concepts, and thoughts. My mind is not blank, nor is it "silent." I process information through my brain, my eyes, my nose, my tongue, and my touch, all in the same way anyone would process their information. Sound just isn't part of my thought process, and because it's not part of my thought process does not mean I don't have an inner voice. I do. I'm a conscious, sentient being who thinks and reasons. :-) .2m Views-View Upvotes Upvote 46k Downvote Comments 386+ View 85 Other Answers to this Question <p><a href="http://darkhairedgirlfromgallifrey.tumblr.com/post/159394328790/oryeo-ive-always-thought-about-this-cause" class="tumblr_blog">darkhairedgirlfromgallifrey</a>:</p> <blockquote><p><a href="http://oryeo.tumblr.com/post/158733307717" class="tumblr_blog">oryeo</a>:</p> <blockquote><p>❤️</p></blockquote> <p>I’ve always thought about this cause of course if you’re hearing you think words but if you’ve never been deaf then it’s very to try and imagine how they “think”. Whereas when we think we “hear” the words. I can hear them as I type this so to know exactly how a deaf person thinks or how their inner voice (for lack of a better word) works is fascinating.</p></blockquote> <p>I&rsquo;ve honestly never thought about this before but that&rsquo;s really interesting. I have thought about what blind people dream though.</p>
 thought process: Popular on Quora
 If a person is born deaf, which language do they
 think in?
 Michele Westfall, speaks ASL fluently
 Updated Sep 2 Upvoted by Laura Hale, Disability sport reporter and Ashley Harris,
 Teacher of the Deaf and I am also Deaf myself.
 I was born Deaf and have been Deaf my whole life. I do not wear hearing aids or
 cochlear implants (and have no desire to wear either). I speak American sign language
 (ASL) and it is my primary language. I am a mother of two born-Deaf children, so our
 being Deaf is genetic for us.
 I have a 'voice' in my head, but it is not sound-based. I am a visual being, so in my
 head, I either see ASL signs, or pictures, or sometimes printed words. My inner voice
 does have words, concepts, and thoughts. My mind is not blank, nor is it "silent."
 I process information through my brain, my eyes, my nose, my tongue, and my touch,
 all in the same way anyone would process their information. Sound just isn't part of
 my thought process, and because it's not part of my thought process does not mean I
 don't have an inner voice. I do.
 I'm a conscious, sentient being who thinks and reasons. :-)
 .2m Views-View Upvotes
 Upvote 46k Downvote Comments 386+
 View 85 Other Answers to this Question
<p><a href="http://darkhairedgirlfromgallifrey.tumblr.com/post/159394328790/oryeo-ive-always-thought-about-this-cause" class="tumblr_blog">darkhairedgirlfromgallifrey</a>:</p>

<blockquote><p><a href="http://oryeo.tumblr.com/post/158733307717" class="tumblr_blog">oryeo</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>❤️</p></blockquote>

<p>I’ve always thought about this cause of course if you’re hearing you think words but if you’ve never been deaf then it’s very to try and imagine how they “think”. Whereas when we think we “hear” the words. I can hear them as I type this so to know exactly how a deaf person thinks or how their inner voice (for lack of a better word) works is fascinating.</p></blockquote>

<p>I&rsquo;ve honestly never thought about this before but that&rsquo;s really interesting. I have thought about what blind people dream though.</p>

<p><a href="http://darkhairedgirlfromgallifrey.tumblr.com/post/159394328790/oryeo-ive-always-thought-about-this-cause" class="tumblr_blog...

thought process: Emily of the State @EmilyGorcenski Trump doesn't speak in full, coherent sentences, because he's speaking a different language, one his followers understand but we don't. 2/19/17, 6:51 AM 86 RETWEETS 223 LIKES Emily of the State It's fascinating in a "Darmok and Jalad at Tanagra" sense. He begins a clause, and @Emily Gorcenski 1h finishes it with nonsense filler words. 2 4 35 Emily of the State But his followers have already used their bias to fill in meaning. @EmilyGorcenski 1h 1 30 Emily of the State "You look at what happened in Sweden last night, they took in large numbers, they're having problems they never though possible." @EmilyGorcenski 1h 구 8 1 20 Emily of the State @EmilyGorcenski 1h This isn't a sentence. It's three sentence fragments strung together that only make sense if you fill in meaning. 구 7 2 32 Emily of the State Sweden didn't take in large numbers of anything the night before, nor did they have problems taking in large numbers. No, @EmilyGorcenski 1h this is innuendo. 1 4 21 Emily of the State And none of us know what it's supposed to mean because we're trying to reconstruct logical sentences, and not filling in with our biases @EmilyGorcenski 1h 구 5 1 20 Emily of the State The sentence makes perfect sense to his followers. A large number of muslim refugees caused problems that the lying media isn't reporting. @EmilyGorcenski 1h 1 5 20 Emily of the State This style of speaking reinforces the biases of the listener, that's why it's so dangerous. We can't treat it as if Obama is speaking Con Law @Emily Gorcenski 1h 2 37 Emily of the State Trump "says it like it is" by saying the first part of a thought and letting the listener fill in the rest. Exactly as it is in their mind. @Emily Gorcenski 1h 27 3 67 fishnbanjos: abbiehollowdays: spoonmeb: itsathought2: everydayjewels: wellthatsjustgreat: A good take on why Trumpkins don’t hear what the rest of us hear when President Trump spews incoherent word salad. Also why I have limited interest in, or energy for, trying to persuade them through rational debate. I have been baffled by this all along - I could not for the life of me imagine what his supporters were hearing when they listened to him babble incoherently. He’s like a political Rorschach’s test. I feel like I’ve had the curtain drawn back.   I realized I do this to him too. I’m always trying to figure out WHAT THE FUCK HE MEANS.  Only because I don’t like him and what he stands for,  I’m actually trying to parse reality from it, so it strikes me as insane.   But if I was predisposed to him, my mind would decide on something that filled out my preconceived expectation.   Humans Brains are so fucking weak and wrong.  If you’ve paid attention to the way racist/generally bigoted white people have talked literally since the dawn of time, this wouldn’t be a surprise to you, but I like the way OT phrased it. But really people often talk like this when they want to say horrible things about other human beings they know they shouldn’t be saying, it’s just with Trump it suddenly matters can’t he’s flushing our country down the toilet. See: the way white people have always talked about the mysterious inner city and the infamous black on black crime. Or just black women in general. There are always unfinished sentences about black people/POC and ya’ll never have trouble completely them in your own heads. It’s like their very own “auto-complete” for searches they know have already been done by their supporters time and time again. By the way, Fox News has been doing a similar version of this for years. A local columnist pointed out that they often ask absolutely ridiculous questions, but because they ask it in question form, they get wiggle room. “Does Obama want to kill your grandparents when they go to the doctor?” Now, the question in itself is open ended, but obviously, you’re set up to believe that, yes, your grandparents will die because of Obama. The onus is on the station to disprove a question like this, but instead they throw a vague, twisted statement out and have two opposing people argue as if both sides of the conversation are equal in value and truth. The subject of the question then the non-clear rebuttal makes the answer seem obvious that Obama is killing your sweet granny and grandpa when they go for a flu shot. I say all this because this network has been grooming their followers to fill in the blanks from vagueness this entire time. Trump just knows how to fill in just enough words to start the thought process down that way. He’s taken what Fox News started and perfected it.
 thought process: Emily of the State
 @EmilyGorcenski
 Trump doesn't speak in full, coherent
 sentences, because he's speaking a
 different language, one his followers
 understand but we don't.
 2/19/17, 6:51 AM
 86 RETWEETS 223 LIKES
 Emily of the State
 It's fascinating in a "Darmok and Jalad at
 Tanagra" sense. He begins a clause, and
 @Emily Gorcenski 1h
 finishes it with nonsense filler words.
 2
 4
 35
 Emily of the State
 But his followers have already used their
 bias to fill in meaning.
 @EmilyGorcenski 1h
 1
 30

 Emily of the State
 "You look at what happened in Sweden last
 night, they took in large numbers, they're
 having problems they never though
 possible."
 @EmilyGorcenski 1h
 구 8
 1
 20
 Emily of the State
 @EmilyGorcenski 1h
 This isn't a sentence. It's three sentence
 fragments strung together that only make
 sense if you fill in meaning.
 구 7
 2
 32
 Emily of the State
 Sweden didn't take in large numbers of
 anything the night before, nor did they
 have problems taking in large numbers. No,
 @EmilyGorcenski 1h
 this is innuendo.
 1
 4
 21
 Emily of the State
 And none of us know what it's supposed to
 mean because we're trying to reconstruct
 logical sentences, and not filling in with our
 biases
 @EmilyGorcenski 1h
 구 5
 1
 20

 Emily of the State
 The sentence makes perfect sense to his
 followers. A large number of muslim
 refugees caused problems that the lying
 media isn't reporting.
 @EmilyGorcenski 1h
 1
 5
 20
 Emily of the State
 This style of speaking reinforces the biases
 of the listener, that's why it's so
 dangerous. We can't treat it as if Obama is
 speaking Con Law
 @Emily Gorcenski 1h
 2
 37
 Emily of the State
 Trump "says it like it is" by saying the first
 part of a thought and letting the listener fill
 in the rest. Exactly as it is in their mind.
 @Emily Gorcenski 1h
 27
 3
 67
fishnbanjos:

abbiehollowdays:

spoonmeb:

itsathought2:

everydayjewels:

wellthatsjustgreat:


A good take on why Trumpkins don’t hear what the rest of us hear when President Trump spews incoherent word salad. 

Also why I have limited interest in, or energy for, trying to persuade them through rational debate.


I have been baffled by this all along - I could not for the life of me imagine what his supporters were hearing when they listened to him babble incoherently. He’s like a political Rorschach’s test.

I feel like I’ve had the curtain drawn back.  
I realized I do this to him too. I’m always trying to figure out WHAT THE FUCK HE MEANS.  Only because I don’t like him and what he stands for,  I’m actually trying to parse reality from it, so it strikes me as insane.  
But if I was predisposed to him, my mind would decide on something that filled out my preconceived expectation.  
Humans Brains are so fucking weak and wrong. 


If you’ve paid attention to the way racist/generally bigoted white people have talked literally since the dawn of time, this wouldn’t be a surprise to you, but I like the way OT phrased it. 
But really people often talk like this when they want to say horrible things about other human beings they know they shouldn’t be saying, it’s just with Trump it suddenly matters can’t he’s flushing our country down the toilet.
See: the way white people have always talked about the mysterious inner city and the infamous black on black crime. Or just black women in general. There are always unfinished sentences about black people/POC and ya’ll never have trouble completely them in your own heads.

It’s like their very own “auto-complete” for searches they know have already been done by their supporters time and time again.

By the way, Fox News has been doing a similar version of this for years. A local columnist pointed out that they often ask absolutely ridiculous questions, but because they ask it in question form, they get wiggle room. 
“Does Obama want to kill your grandparents when they go to the doctor?” 
Now, the question in itself is open ended, but obviously, you’re set up to believe that, yes, your grandparents will die because of Obama. The onus is on the station to disprove a question like this, but instead they throw a vague, twisted statement out and have two opposing people argue as if both sides of the conversation are equal in value and truth. The subject of the question then the non-clear rebuttal makes the answer seem obvious that Obama is killing your sweet granny and grandpa when they go for a flu shot. 
I say all this because this network has been grooming their followers to fill in the blanks from vagueness this entire time. Trump just knows how to fill in just enough words to start the thought process down that way. He’s taken what Fox News started and perfected it.

fishnbanjos: abbiehollowdays: spoonmeb: itsathought2: everydayjewels: wellthatsjustgreat: A good take on why Trumpkins don’t hear...

thought process: Bitches always think they have the rules on how to keep a man.. Suck him off, make him dinner, don't nag him, don't get fat, never withhold sex... Those same females get cheated on erryday. I will let y'all in on a little secret... The way to keep a man, is to get with a man who WANTS to be kept. It doesn't matter how much you do for an ungrateful nigga, it will never be enough. And vice versa FYM! Go follow ➡@terryderon ⬅️ I was sent this post and asked to give my thoughts on it. I think it represents how a lot of women think but it doesn't really represent real life. It is true that there are situations where a woman could have been doing everything that was expected of her and still get cheated on and so can a man. That doesn't represent most situations where cheating occurs though. Nobody can make their partner ultimately decide to cheat but they can directly influence the way that they feel about their spouse and their relationship which will ultimately be the things that are being considered when he is in a situation where he has to choose whether or not to be faithful. A man that is very unhappy with his woman and doesn't feel respected, wanted, appreciated is much more likely to give in to temptation than a man that is happy at home. A woman with a "fuck it he's going to cheat anyway mentality" is not very likely to create a pleasant environment for her man and their relationship and give him a feeling of "it's not worth losing what I have at home" feeling and thought process when presented with an opportunity to experience something with another woman. So it is true the only way to keep a man is by being the type of woman and creating the kind of relationship that makes him want to be with u! Tag someone that would like my page or the things I talk about! For the most viral memes on social media ✔check out @quotekillahs Dm us to reach over a 1,000,000💪ACTIVE followers for your promotion and marketing needs. Our advertising network consist of ♻@QK4life 💯@terryderon 😂@tales4dahood 👑@ogboombostic 😍@just2vicious @libra_and_aries and 🙏@boutmyblessings terryderon quotekillahs reallove trust advice lovelife dating relationships message nolie wordstoliveby truestory trust respect realtalk imjustsaying
 thought process: Bitches always think they have
 the rules on how to keep a
 man.. Suck him off, make him
 dinner, don't nag him, don't
 get fat, never withhold sex...
 Those same females get
 cheated on erryday.
 I will let y'all in on a little
 secret... The way to keep a
 man, is to get with a man who
 WANTS to be kept. It doesn't
 matter how much you do for
 an ungrateful nigga, it will
 never be enough.
 And vice versa FYM!
Go follow ➡@terryderon ⬅️ I was sent this post and asked to give my thoughts on it. I think it represents how a lot of women think but it doesn't really represent real life. It is true that there are situations where a woman could have been doing everything that was expected of her and still get cheated on and so can a man. That doesn't represent most situations where cheating occurs though. Nobody can make their partner ultimately decide to cheat but they can directly influence the way that they feel about their spouse and their relationship which will ultimately be the things that are being considered when he is in a situation where he has to choose whether or not to be faithful. A man that is very unhappy with his woman and doesn't feel respected, wanted, appreciated is much more likely to give in to temptation than a man that is happy at home. A woman with a "fuck it he's going to cheat anyway mentality" is not very likely to create a pleasant environment for her man and their relationship and give him a feeling of "it's not worth losing what I have at home" feeling and thought process when presented with an opportunity to experience something with another woman. So it is true the only way to keep a man is by being the type of woman and creating the kind of relationship that makes him want to be with u! Tag someone that would like my page or the things I talk about! For the most viral memes on social media ✔check out @quotekillahs Dm us to reach over a 1,000,000💪ACTIVE followers for your promotion and marketing needs. Our advertising network consist of ♻@QK4life 💯@terryderon 😂@tales4dahood 👑@ogboombostic 😍@just2vicious @libra_and_aries and 🙏@boutmyblessings terryderon quotekillahs reallove trust advice lovelife dating relationships message nolie wordstoliveby truestory trust respect realtalk imjustsaying

Go follow ➡@terryderon ⬅️ I was sent this post and asked to give my thoughts on it. I think it represents how a lot of women think but it...

thought process: (Quran, 13:11) Allah Will Not Change The Condition OfA Person Until They Change What Is In Themselves. ardenoahebious In order to improve ourselves and to seek true contentment within our lives, we need to regularly observe our attitudes, reactions and thought processes. Do we spend our time wisely? Is it pleasing to Allah? Reflecting deeply to identify our flaws and our strengths is the beginning of making a positive change. - "Indeed he succeeds who purifies it (his own self). And he has failed who instills it with corruption” (Quran, 91:9-10) - In order to grow our relationship with others, we must communicate productively and be ready to apologise or forgive others for Allah's sake. Humility leads to strength and not weakness. - The Messenger of Allah, (peace and blessings be upon him) said, “Those who are merciful will be shown mercy by the Most Merciful. Be merciful to those on the earth and the One in the heavens will have mercy upon you.” (Sunan al-Tirmidhi, 1924, Grade: Sahih) - With this understanding in hand, as well as the knowledge required for improving ourselves, we can achieve living an upright and peaceful life. - Eventually, we will come to see what really matters in life is our spirituality and closeness to Allah, in addition to the happiness, love and mercy we can provide to others. Once this has been established everything else falls into place by His mercy. - Lets reflect upon on our condition, Allah's help is near, but how near are we to Allah? @gardenofthepious
 thought process: (Quran, 13:11)
 Allah Will Not Change
 The Condition OfA Person
 Until They Change
 What Is In Themselves.
 ardenoahebious
In order to improve ourselves and to seek true contentment within our lives, we need to regularly observe our attitudes, reactions and thought processes. Do we spend our time wisely? Is it pleasing to Allah? Reflecting deeply to identify our flaws and our strengths is the beginning of making a positive change. - "Indeed he succeeds who purifies it (his own self). And he has failed who instills it with corruption” (Quran, 91:9-10) - In order to grow our relationship with others, we must communicate productively and be ready to apologise or forgive others for Allah's sake. Humility leads to strength and not weakness. - The Messenger of Allah, (peace and blessings be upon him) said, “Those who are merciful will be shown mercy by the Most Merciful. Be merciful to those on the earth and the One in the heavens will have mercy upon you.” (Sunan al-Tirmidhi, 1924, Grade: Sahih) - With this understanding in hand, as well as the knowledge required for improving ourselves, we can achieve living an upright and peaceful life. - Eventually, we will come to see what really matters in life is our spirituality and closeness to Allah, in addition to the happiness, love and mercy we can provide to others. Once this has been established everything else falls into place by His mercy. - Lets reflect upon on our condition, Allah's help is near, but how near are we to Allah? @gardenofthepious

In order to improve ourselves and to seek true contentment within our lives, we need to regularly observe our attitudes, reactions and th...

thought process: Protection in the night Prepped for her pleasure Good Knight Gothamites! Tomorrow we will continue "50 Tales for 50 Years: A Celebration of Barbara Gordon" with our last 3 stories! Earlier in our session (2 posts back) we discussed Kyle Higgins' 2014 story "Older Wounds" that shed light on the romantic affair between Bruce Wayne and Barbara Gordon. In 2016's DC Animated Film "Batman: The Killing Joke" as a prelude to the telling of Alan Moore's graphic novel, we see Bruce and Barbara in what is now deemed a "controversial" sex scene. While I make light of this scene with an account edit using art from @BossLogic's (Bosslogicinc.com) hilarious condom series "Safety First", executive producer Bruce Timm discussed in an interview the thought process him, screenplay writer Brian Azzarello and producer Alan Burnett had while wanting to explore this dynamic: "It was really important to us to show that both of the characters make some pretty big mistakes...so it's very human; it's a very understandable story." What are your thoughts on Batman and Batgirl's relationship in this animated film and did this portion of Barbara's prequel story help or hinder your experience watching this highly anticipated adaptation? As always, thanks for following on and off of Instagram, your support is always appreciated! Have a great night and we will have more History of the Batman tomorrow. Remember Gothamites, it's all about Peace, Love and Batman! ✌🏼💙💛🦇
 thought process: Protection in the night
 Prepped for her pleasure
Good Knight Gothamites! Tomorrow we will continue "50 Tales for 50 Years: A Celebration of Barbara Gordon" with our last 3 stories! Earlier in our session (2 posts back) we discussed Kyle Higgins' 2014 story "Older Wounds" that shed light on the romantic affair between Bruce Wayne and Barbara Gordon. In 2016's DC Animated Film "Batman: The Killing Joke" as a prelude to the telling of Alan Moore's graphic novel, we see Bruce and Barbara in what is now deemed a "controversial" sex scene. While I make light of this scene with an account edit using art from @BossLogic's (Bosslogicinc.com) hilarious condom series "Safety First", executive producer Bruce Timm discussed in an interview the thought process him, screenplay writer Brian Azzarello and producer Alan Burnett had while wanting to explore this dynamic: "It was really important to us to show that both of the characters make some pretty big mistakes...so it's very human; it's a very understandable story." What are your thoughts on Batman and Batgirl's relationship in this animated film and did this portion of Barbara's prequel story help or hinder your experience watching this highly anticipated adaptation? As always, thanks for following on and off of Instagram, your support is always appreciated! Have a great night and we will have more History of the Batman tomorrow. Remember Gothamites, it's all about Peace, Love and Batman! ✌🏼💙💛🦇

Good Knight Gothamites! Tomorrow we will continue "50 Tales for 50 Years: A Celebration of Barbara Gordon" with our last 3 stories! Earli...

thought process: MAKE AMERICA AWAKE AGAIN @Regrann from @eclectically_esoteric - AMERICA would take on the following meaning in this given arrangement “A*MERI*CA”: A= THE MERI= BELOVED In ancient Kemet “Meri” by itself or attached to other words denoted a sense of elevated status. For instance, “Meri-Ka-Ra” means “the beloved of the Ka or Re” or “The Ka of Re is loved.” “Ta-Meri” one of the various names ascribed to the Kemetic civilization means “the beloved land.” CA= equivalent to “Ka”. The letters “C” and “K” are interchangeable for “C” sometimes carries the sound as “K”. K is the spirit that inhabits [a] body during life and can survive after-through death. However, The race has become accustomed to identifying the Will with the Ego. For instance, we speak of a “weak will,” or a “strong will,” a “vacillating will,” or a “persistent, determined will,”; when we really mean to indicate the different degrees of the activity and expression of the Ego itself. The reason why people fail is clear and obvious to one who makes a rational investigation of the matter. When the Mob governs, man is ruled by ignorance. The majority of humanity is now ignorant of self; when the church governs, man is ruled by superstition; and when the state governs, they are ruled by fear. Before Womb(Man) can live together in harmony and understanding, ignorance must be transmuted into wisdom, superstition into illumined faith, and fear into love. Mind makes Man. And, the masses of the race, are really little more than automatons. Control the Mind and you control the Man. Their wills are called into activity by every passing desire, their passions and desires are uncontrolled, and their thought-processes are the result of suggestions made by others but which they accept and then fondly imagine they have thought the thing for themselves. Enlighten the Mind and you enlighten the Man. Blank the Mind and you blank the Man. 50% of the masses are almost blank. 25% are partially blank. Science has shown that the best of us use less than 10% of our brain capacity. The inevitable is that we are all at least 90% ignorant. It is hard to believe that we know so little about ourselves and our world in which we live. Conscious Mind is lim
 thought process: MAKE AMERICA
 AWAKE AGAIN
@Regrann from @eclectically_esoteric - AMERICA would take on the following meaning in this given arrangement “A*MERI*CA”: A= THE MERI= BELOVED In ancient Kemet “Meri” by itself or attached to other words denoted a sense of elevated status. For instance, “Meri-Ka-Ra” means “the beloved of the Ka or Re” or “The Ka of Re is loved.” “Ta-Meri” one of the various names ascribed to the Kemetic civilization means “the beloved land.” CA= equivalent to “Ka”. The letters “C” and “K” are interchangeable for “C” sometimes carries the sound as “K”. K is the spirit that inhabits [a] body during life and can survive after-through death. However, The race has become accustomed to identifying the Will with the Ego. For instance, we speak of a “weak will,” or a “strong will,” a “vacillating will,” or a “persistent, determined will,”; when we really mean to indicate the different degrees of the activity and expression of the Ego itself. The reason why people fail is clear and obvious to one who makes a rational investigation of the matter. When the Mob governs, man is ruled by ignorance. The majority of humanity is now ignorant of self; when the church governs, man is ruled by superstition; and when the state governs, they are ruled by fear. Before Womb(Man) can live together in harmony and understanding, ignorance must be transmuted into wisdom, superstition into illumined faith, and fear into love. Mind makes Man. And, the masses of the race, are really little more than automatons. Control the Mind and you control the Man. Their wills are called into activity by every passing desire, their passions and desires are uncontrolled, and their thought-processes are the result of suggestions made by others but which they accept and then fondly imagine they have thought the thing for themselves. Enlighten the Mind and you enlighten the Man. Blank the Mind and you blank the Man. 50% of the masses are almost blank. 25% are partially blank. Science has shown that the best of us use less than 10% of our brain capacity. The inevitable is that we are all at least 90% ignorant. It is hard to believe that we know so little about ourselves and our world in which we live. Conscious Mind is lim

@Regrann from @eclectically_esoteric - AMERICA would take on the following meaning in this given arrangement “A*MERI*CA”: A= THE MERI= BE...