Forking
Forking

Forking

Is This
Is This

Is This

Fork
Fork

Fork

Incoming
Incoming

Incoming

That
That

That

Loving Life
Loving Life

Loving Life

your next
 your next

your next

yours
yours

yours

comming
comming

comming

love life
love life

love life

🔥 | Latest

Family, Friends, and God: Public Universal Friend The Public Universal Friend (born Jemima Wilkinson; November 29, 1752 – July 1, 1819), was born as an English- American to a Quaker family on Rhode Island, and was assigned female at birth. This person suffered a severe illness in 1776 (age 24), and reported having died and been reanimated by the power of God as a genderless evangelist named the Public Universal Friend. The Friend refused to answer any A portrait of the Public Universal a longer to the previous name, Friend, from the Friend's biography Jemima Wilkinson, (1 quoted Luke written by David Hudson in 1821. 23:3 ("thou sayest it") when visitors asked if it was the name of the person they were addressing, and ignored or chastised those who insisted on using it. The preacher shunned the name "Jemima" completely, having friends hold realty in trust rather than see the name on deeds and titles. Even when a lawyer insisted that the person's Will should identify its subject as having been born under the name Jemima, the preacher refused to sign that name, only making an X which others witnessed, even though the Friend could read and write.2) The Friend asked not to be referred to with gendered pronouns. Followers respected these wishes, avoiding gender-specific pronouns even in private diaries, and referring only to "the Public Universal Friend" or short forms such as "the Friend" or "P.U.F."3] madnessofmen:only address me as The Friend from now on
Family, Friends, and God: Public Universal Friend
 The Public Universal Friend
 (born Jemima Wilkinson;
 November 29, 1752 – July 1,
 1819), was born as an English-
 American to a Quaker family on
 Rhode Island, and was assigned
 female at birth. This person
 suffered a severe illness in 1776
 (age 24), and reported having died
 and been reanimated by the power
 of God as a genderless evangelist
 named the Public Universal Friend.
 The Friend refused to answer any
 A portrait of the Public Universal a
 longer to the previous name,
 Friend, from the Friend's biography
 Jemima Wilkinson, (1 quoted Luke
 written by David Hudson in 1821.
 23:3 ("thou sayest it") when visitors
 asked if it was the name of the
 person they were addressing, and ignored or chastised those who
 insisted on using it. The preacher shunned the name "Jemima"
 completely, having friends hold realty in trust rather than see the name
 on deeds and titles. Even when a lawyer insisted that the person's Will
 should identify its subject as having been born under the name Jemima,
 the preacher refused to sign that name, only making an X which others
 witnessed, even though the Friend could read and write.2)
 The Friend asked not to be referred to with gendered pronouns.
 Followers respected these wishes, avoiding gender-specific pronouns
 even in private diaries, and referring only to "the Public Universal
 Friend" or short forms such as "the Friend" or "P.U.F."3]
madnessofmen:only address me as The Friend from now on

madnessofmen:only address me as The Friend from now on

Matthew McConaughey, Target, and Youtu: Jimmy gets a private lesson from Professor Matthew McConaughey at UT Austin.
Matthew McConaughey, Target, and Youtu: Jimmy gets a private lesson from Professor Matthew McConaughey at UT Austin.

Jimmy gets a private lesson from Professor Matthew McConaughey at UT Austin.

Bad, Cher, and Children: Cher @cher Happy Day My Darling Son Mom 2:26 PM 04 Mar 16 514 RETWEETS 2,869 LIKES sonneillonv: rocknlobster: twunkmccree: brotoro: svpermodeling: Every mother with trans children should take Cher as an example. ok i love her but lets not give brownie points because she called him her son. thats like. minimum requirement for a decent human being. Ok, you know what? No. Brownie points to Cher. She publicly announced her love and acceptance of her SON and yeah some people would call that “the minimum requirement” of decency, but as someone whose mother gushes about her acceptance in private and sometimes uses gender neutral terms for me (not the male ones I prefer) but aggressively misgenders me in public to keep things from being “awkward”, cher’s public acknowledgement and expression of her love and acceptance for her son is a big deal. Yes this SHOULD BE the bare minimum of parental decency, but right now it’s not and I’m glad to see Chaz and Cher showing the world that this is the way things are supposed to be. What is up with the idea that we shouldn’t acknowledge when people do something good/nice/etc. because “everyone should be doing that anyway”? It is BY acknowledging the things we see as good that we tell others how we see the world and enforce what we consider proper behavior. There is literally never a time when it doesn’t make sense to acknowledge something positive. And acknowledging something positive does NOT make some sort of blanket statement about the person like they can do no wrong either. We can acknowledge a positive, and also criticize a negative; there is no zero-sum game here. Reinforcing good behavior is just as important, in fact more important, than criticizing bad behavior when it comes to making a change.  This is true of training pets, children, and cis people.
Bad, Cher, and Children: Cher
 @cher
 Happy Day My Darling Son
 Mom
 2:26 PM 04 Mar 16
 514 RETWEETS 2,869 LIKES
sonneillonv:
rocknlobster:

twunkmccree:

brotoro:

svpermodeling:
Every mother with trans children should take Cher as an example.

ok i love her but lets not give brownie points because she called him her son. thats like. minimum requirement for a decent human being.

Ok, you know what? No. Brownie points to Cher. 

She publicly announced her love and acceptance of her SON and yeah some people would call that “the minimum requirement” of decency, but as someone whose mother gushes about her acceptance in private and sometimes uses gender neutral terms for me (not the male ones I prefer) but aggressively misgenders me in public to keep things from being “awkward”, cher’s public acknowledgement and expression of her love and acceptance for her son is a big deal.

Yes this SHOULD BE the bare minimum of parental decency, but right now it’s not and I’m glad to see Chaz and Cher showing the world that this is the way things are supposed to be.

What is up with the idea that we shouldn’t acknowledge when people do something good/nice/etc. because “everyone should be doing that anyway”? It is BY acknowledging the things we see as good that we tell others how we see the world and enforce what we consider proper behavior. There is literally never a time when it doesn’t make sense to acknowledge something positive. And acknowledging something positive does NOT make some sort of blanket statement about the person like they can do no wrong either. We can acknowledge a positive, and also criticize a negative; there is no zero-sum game here.

Reinforcing good behavior is just as important, in fact more important, than criticizing bad behavior when it comes to making a change.  This is true of training pets, children, and cis people.

sonneillonv: rocknlobster: twunkmccree: brotoro: svpermodeling: Every mother with trans children should take Cher as an example. ok i lo...

Cher, Children, and Love: Cher @cher Happy Day My Darling Son Mom 2:26 PM 04 Mar 16 514 RETWEETS 2,869 LIKES rocknlobster: twunkmccree: brotoro: svpermodeling: Every mother with trans children should take Cher as an example. ok i love her but lets not give brownie points because she called him her son. thats like. minimum requirement for a decent human being. Ok, you know what? No. Brownie points to Cher. She publicly announced her love and acceptance of her SON and yeah some people would call that “the minimum requirement” of decency, but as someone whose mother gushes about her acceptance in private and sometimes uses gender neutral terms for me (not the male ones I prefer) but aggressively misgenders me in public to keep things from being “awkward”, cher’s public acknowledgement and expression of her love and acceptance for her son is a big deal. Yes this SHOULD BE the bare minimum of parental decency, but right now it’s not and I’m glad to see Chaz and Cher showing the world that this is the way things are supposed to be. What is up with the idea that we shouldn’t acknowledge when people do something good/nice/etc. because “everyone should be doing that anyway”? It is BY acknowledging the things we see as good that we tell others how we see the world and enforce what we consider proper behavior. There is literally never a time when it doesn’t make sense to acknowledge something positive. And acknowledging something positive does NOT make some sort of blanket statement about the person like they can do no wrong either. We can acknowledge a positive, and also criticize a negative; there is no zero-sum game here.
Cher, Children, and Love: Cher
 @cher
 Happy Day My Darling Son
 Mom
 2:26 PM 04 Mar 16
 514 RETWEETS 2,869 LIKES
rocknlobster:

twunkmccree:

brotoro:

svpermodeling:
Every mother with trans children should take Cher as an example.

ok i love her but lets not give brownie points because she called him her son. thats like. minimum requirement for a decent human being.

Ok, you know what? No. Brownie points to Cher. 

She publicly announced her love and acceptance of her SON and yeah some people would call that “the minimum requirement” of decency, but as someone whose mother gushes about her acceptance in private and sometimes uses gender neutral terms for me (not the male ones I prefer) but aggressively misgenders me in public to keep things from being “awkward”, cher’s public acknowledgement and expression of her love and acceptance for her son is a big deal.

Yes this SHOULD BE the bare minimum of parental decency, but right now it’s not and I’m glad to see Chaz and Cher showing the world that this is the way things are supposed to be.

What is up with the idea that we shouldn’t acknowledge when people do something good/nice/etc. because “everyone should be doing that anyway”? It is BY acknowledging the things we see as good that we tell others how we see the world and enforce what we consider proper behavior. There is literally never a time when it doesn’t make sense to acknowledge something positive. And acknowledging something positive does NOT make some sort of blanket statement about the person like they can do no wrong either. We can acknowledge a positive, and also criticize a negative; there is no zero-sum game here.

rocknlobster: twunkmccree: brotoro: svpermodeling: Every mother with trans children should take Cher as an example. ok i love her but le...

Friends, Tumblr, and Las Vegas: Nibel @Nibellion Bethesda announces Fallout 1st, a premium membership for Fallout 76 1 month: $12.99 1 year: $99.99 fallout.bethesda.net/en/article/3r1.. Fallaut 1st 1s MEMBER Fallaut 1st MEMBERSHIP BENEFITS Play in a Private World exclusively for you and up to seven friends PRIVATE WORLDS Unlimited storage for crafting components in your own new Scrapbox container. SCRAPBOX A new placeable fast travel point with a Stash, Sleeping Bag, and more for your basic needs. SURVIVAL TENT Receive 1,650 Atoms per month to use in the Atomic Shop ATOMS An iconic Fallout outfit, exclusively for members RANGER ARMOR OUTFIT Unique icons and emates, available only to members. ICONS & EMOTES PACK vaporwavevocap: armsnotsigns: datanazush: metalbatteryzone: metalbatteryzone: Todd please Bethesda really looked at the Ranger Armor and went “wow cool suit!” and will give it to you for $13/mo Remember the ranger armor only exists because Bethesda refused to let Obsidian make new power armor designs for New Vegas, and now they’re stealing it because it’s ‘iconic’ (Read: better than anything they could make) But they did make new power armor designs for new Vegas… They had different versions of older designs and NPC armor in some cases but I can’t think of much else. I’ve honestly never seen a company with as much contempt for its users as Bethesda..
Friends, Tumblr, and Las Vegas: Nibel
 @Nibellion
 Bethesda announces Fallout 1st, a premium
 membership for Fallout 76
 1 month: $12.99
 1 year: $99.99
 fallout.bethesda.net/en/article/3r1..
 Fallaut 1st
 1s MEMBER

 Fallaut 1st
 MEMBERSHIP BENEFITS
 Play in a Private World exclusively for you and up to
 seven friends
 PRIVATE WORLDS
 Unlimited storage for crafting components in your own new
 Scrapbox container.
 SCRAPBOX
 A new placeable fast travel point with a Stash, Sleeping Bag,
 and more for your basic needs.
 SURVIVAL TENT
 Receive 1,650 Atoms per month to use in the Atomic Shop
 ATOMS
 An iconic Fallout outfit, exclusively for members
 RANGER ARMOR OUTFIT
 Unique icons and emates, available only to members.
 ICONS & EMOTES PACK
vaporwavevocap:

armsnotsigns:
datanazush:

metalbatteryzone:

metalbatteryzone:
Todd please
Bethesda really looked at the Ranger Armor and went “wow cool suit!” and will give it to you for $13/mo

Remember the ranger armor only exists because Bethesda refused to let Obsidian make new power armor designs for New Vegas, and now they’re stealing it because it’s ‘iconic’ (Read: better than anything they could make)


But they did make new power armor designs for new Vegas…

They had different versions of older designs and NPC armor in some cases but I can’t think of much else.

I’ve honestly never seen a company with as much contempt for its users as Bethesda..

vaporwavevocap: armsnotsigns: datanazush: metalbatteryzone: metalbatteryzone: Todd please Bethesda really looked at the Ranger Armor and ...

Ass, Lol, and Nudes: lweet A Boogie @BoogieBankss 22h I had a chick go behind my car and text her homegirl my plate number before she got in the car with me. 58 163 415 @saintcleopatra 17h Did you enjoy your date? O 1 04 A Boogie @BoogieBankss Replying to @saintcleopatra I left her ass there and went home lol Not taking no woman nowhere that's doin all that. 7/17/17, 3:22 PM 23 Retweets 25 Likes itsgonnabeacoldwinter-soldier: furbytheminx: dandridgegirl: adreamdeferred: dynastylnoire: blackgirloutrage2: PAY ATTENTION! This is how you weed out the men who deserve your time and the ones that don’t. These dudes are literally telling you who they are, but y'all refuse to listen. Your safety comes first. I’m in a FB group where dudes 30 and older were having full tantrums over this post. These are the same guys that admit: Not deleting nudes post break up Not believing when women that were sexually assaulted Not believing sex with a partner that is sleeping is rape Etc. Please do not date people that take issue with your protecting yourself. i deadass took a picture of my dates license and sent to my homegirls in the gc. and turned on my location. yea you cool but it’s always about me and my safety. Men who aren’t trash should already know this is commonplace. One of my last dates even offered to take a picture together for my safety text. Men who get mad when women try to protect themselves are just telling on themselves, nothing more. All you people out there talking about “spreading my private information” like you don’t drive around with your liscense plate out there for everyone and their mom to see all day every day. Sit down. Shut up. She didn’t ask for your social security number you absolute acorn. Your plates are public knowledge.
Ass, Lol, and Nudes: lweet
 A Boogie @BoogieBankss 22h
 I had a chick go behind my car and text
 her homegirl my plate number before
 she got in the car with me.
 58 163 415
 @saintcleopatra 17h
 Did you enjoy your date?
 O 1
 04
 A Boogie
 @BoogieBankss
 Replying to @saintcleopatra
 I left her ass there and went home lol
 Not taking no woman nowhere that's
 doin all that.
 7/17/17, 3:22 PM
 23 Retweets 25 Likes
itsgonnabeacoldwinter-soldier:

furbytheminx:

dandridgegirl:


adreamdeferred:


dynastylnoire:


blackgirloutrage2:

PAY ATTENTION! This is how you weed out the men who deserve your time and the ones that don’t. These dudes are literally telling you who they are, but y'all refuse to listen. Your safety comes first.

I’m in a FB group where dudes 30 and older were having full tantrums over this post. These are the same guys that admit:
Not deleting nudes post break up
Not believing when women that were sexually assaulted 
Not believing sex with a partner that is sleeping is rape
Etc. 
Please do not date people that take issue with your protecting yourself.


i deadass took a picture of my dates license and sent to my homegirls in the gc. and turned on my location. yea you cool but it’s always about me and my safety. 


Men who aren’t trash should already know this is commonplace. One of my last dates even offered to take a picture together for my safety text. 


Men who get mad when women try to protect themselves are just telling on themselves, nothing more. 


All you people out there talking about “spreading my private information” like you don’t drive around with your liscense plate out there for everyone and their mom to see all day every day. Sit down. Shut up. She didn’t ask for your social security number you absolute acorn. Your plates are public knowledge.

itsgonnabeacoldwinter-soldier: furbytheminx: dandridgegirl: adreamdeferred: dynastylnoire: blackgirloutrage2: PAY ATTENTION! This i...