Vibrating
Vibrating

Vibrating

Elevated
Elevated

Elevated

spider-man-homecoming
spider-man-homecoming

spider-man-homecoming

elevators
 elevators

elevators

elevate
 elevate

elevate

buttons
 buttons

buttons

back to work
 back to work

back to work

otherwise
otherwise

otherwise

yours
yours

yours

noises
noises

noises

🔥 | Latest

Pressing A Button: IWONDER WHAT THE CODEIS 4 56 kilt54327 b.com Even with those four numbers there are countless possible combinations. Good luck with figuring out which one is the right one you punk straightens calculator* It's pretty likely that it's a four digit number, and as there are four digits chosen there, that means that there cannot be any repetition. This means that there are: n!/(n-4)! possible orders. As n' is 4 (number of digits available). 4!/0! which becomes 4x3x2x1/1 which simplifies to 24. That means that there are 24 possible combinations of codes. This would take you about two or three minutes to input all possible codes Unless an alarm goes off if you don't get it right in 3 tries straightens calculator again Kick the door in Well 'technically' the code is most likley 1970. Statistically, a majority of people, when told to choose a 4 digit code will choose their birth year. And this key pad is obviously a few years old to put it nicely, so that's most likley it Some Sherlock Holmes just went down over here No, no, no. Don't base your deductions of psychology. Let's talk chemistry. When you first press a button, there's more of the natural oils on your skin, and therefore it wears down the numbers on the keys faster. Obviously 0 is the first one, then. Try 0791 first. Sherlock out Woah It got better. And this is why the Sherlock fandom could either rule the world or end it.... Close, but not quite, I think. People will almost always choose a number they can remember. What's memorable about 0791? Try 0719-a birthday, 19th of July. That is more likely. Those deductions are great and all, but unnecessary. The light is green. The door is already open And that's why we have a John Watson. Bless this post!!! #sherlock #photos #text posts #this is like my favourite pot Deductions. (Album)
Pressing A Button: IWONDER WHAT THE CODEIS
 4 56
 kilt54327
 b.com
 Even with those four
 numbers there are
 countless possible
 combinations. Good luck
 with figuring out which one
 is the right one you punk
 straightens calculator*
 It's pretty likely that it's a four
 digit number, and as there are
 four digits chosen there, that
 means that there cannot be
 any repetition. This means
 that there are:

 n!/(n-4)! possible orders. As
 n' is 4 (number of digits
 available). 4!/0! which
 becomes 4x3x2x1/1 which
 simplifies to 24. That means
 that there are 24 possible
 combinations of codes. This
 would take you about two or
 three minutes to input all
 possible codes
 Unless an alarm goes off if you
 don't get it right in 3 tries
 straightens calculator again
 Kick the door in
 Well 'technically' the code is most
 likley 1970. Statistically, a majority
 of people, when told to choose a 4
 digit code will choose their birth
 year. And this key pad is obviously a
 few years old to put it nicely, so
 that's most likley it
 Some Sherlock Holmes just went
 down over here
 No, no, no. Don't base your deductions of
 psychology. Let's talk chemistry. When
 you first press a button, there's more of
 the natural oils on your skin, and
 therefore it wears down the numbers on
 the keys faster. Obviously 0 is the first
 one, then. Try 0791 first.

 Sherlock out
 Woah
 It got better.
 And this is why the Sherlock fandom could
 either rule the world or end it....
 Close, but not quite, I think. People will
 almost always choose a number they can
 remember. What's memorable about 0791? Try
 0719-a birthday, 19th of July. That is more likely.
 Those deductions are great and all, but
 unnecessary.
 The light is green.
 The door is already open
 And that's why we have a John Watson.
 Bless this post!!!
 #sherlock #photos #text posts #this is like my favourite pot
Deductions. (Album)

Deductions. (Album)

Pressing A Button: IF YOU THINK WORKERS WHO STAND OVER BOILING FRY BASKETS 8 HOURS A DAY ARE "LAZY"' AND "DONT DESERVE" $15/HR BUT THE CEO WHO MAKES $9200/HR WORKS HARD" YOU SUCK AS A HUMAN BEING Walter Lim/Flickr <p><a href="http://southernrepublicangirl.tumblr.com/post/140294842178/libertybill-phroyd-republicans-suck-as-human" class="tumblr_blog">southernrepublicangirl</a>:</p> <blockquote><p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://libertybill.tumblr.com/post/140294721282">libertybill</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://phroyd.tumblr.com/post/140214105632">phroyd</a>:</p> <blockquote> <h2>#Republicans Suck As Human Beings!</h2> <p><a href="http://phroyd.tumblr.com">Phroyd</a></p> </blockquote> <h2>Oh jeeze here we go!<br/></h2> <figure data-orig-width="728" data-orig-height="546" class="tmblr-full"><img data-orig-width="728" data-orig-height="546" src="https://78.media.tumblr.com/7c2ab8050267f787c10882d08298e6fe/tumblr_inline_o3dshfzJlK1r4a3sa_540.jpg"/></figure><p>So I really want to address this because this whole concept of who “works harder” and who is more or less “deserving” of wages hinges upon bad economic theory.</p> <p>This is using the outdated <b>Labor Theory of Value</b>. The LTV postulates that the value of a persons labor is what gives value to the good or service they produce and that owners of the means of production reap profit off the difference between wages and the price of the product. <br/></p> <figure data-orig-width="728" data-orig-height="546" class="tmblr-full"><img data-orig-width="728" data-orig-height="546" src="https://78.media.tumblr.com/6ef0d23aa35f80aa514f9a4f3932a97a/tumblr_inline_o3dsg9EQWr1r4a3sa_540.jpg"/></figure><p>In reality, the value of labor in the processes of production have no relation to the value of the good or service. Value of a good or service is completely subjective to each individual. This means that any notion of who deserves what and who works harder than another person is devoid from what they are paid. The value of your labor is comprised of the aggregate subjective opinions of all employers in the market based off the scarcity of your labor. This is called the Subjective Theory of Value.</p> <figure data-orig-width="600" data-orig-height="600" class="tmblr-full"><img data-orig-width="600" data-orig-height="600" src="https://78.media.tumblr.com/a2f0815ec6639d7a321328c4034b7ac1/tumblr_na5cp6rPWh1qd33r3o1_1280.jpg"/></figure></blockquote> <p>I have worked in fast food and let me tell you, there is nothing difficult about putting food in a frier and pressing a button. Easiest, and surprisingly favorite, job I’ve had. </p></blockquote> <p>Lmao OP actually thinks you could put a couple of fry cooks in a board room and have them run the company.</p>
Pressing A Button: IF YOU THINK WORKERS WHO STAND OVER
 BOILING FRY BASKETS 8 HOURS A DAY
 ARE "LAZY"' AND "DONT DESERVE" $15/HR
 BUT THE CEO WHO MAKES $9200/HR
 WORKS HARD"
 YOU SUCK AS A HUMAN BEING
 Walter Lim/Flickr
<p><a href="http://southernrepublicangirl.tumblr.com/post/140294842178/libertybill-phroyd-republicans-suck-as-human" class="tumblr_blog">southernrepublicangirl</a>:</p>

<blockquote><p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://libertybill.tumblr.com/post/140294721282">libertybill</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://phroyd.tumblr.com/post/140214105632">phroyd</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<h2>#Republicans Suck As Human Beings!</h2>
<p><a href="http://phroyd.tumblr.com">Phroyd</a></p>
</blockquote>
<h2>Oh jeeze here we go!<br/></h2>
<figure data-orig-width="728" data-orig-height="546" class="tmblr-full"><img data-orig-width="728" data-orig-height="546" src="https://78.media.tumblr.com/7c2ab8050267f787c10882d08298e6fe/tumblr_inline_o3dshfzJlK1r4a3sa_540.jpg"/></figure><p>So I really want to address this because this whole concept of who “works harder” and who is more or less “deserving” of wages hinges upon bad economic theory.</p>
<p>This is using the outdated <b>Labor Theory of Value</b>. The LTV postulates that the value of a persons labor is what gives value to the good or service they produce and that owners of the means of production reap profit off the difference between wages and the price of the product. <br/></p>
<figure data-orig-width="728" data-orig-height="546" class="tmblr-full"><img data-orig-width="728" data-orig-height="546" src="https://78.media.tumblr.com/6ef0d23aa35f80aa514f9a4f3932a97a/tumblr_inline_o3dsg9EQWr1r4a3sa_540.jpg"/></figure><p>In reality, the value of labor in the processes of production have no relation to the value of the good or service. Value of a good or service is completely subjective to each individual. This means that any notion of who deserves what and who works harder than another person is devoid from what they are paid. The value of your labor is comprised of the aggregate subjective opinions of all employers in the market based off the scarcity of your labor. This is called the Subjective Theory of Value.</p>
<figure data-orig-width="600" data-orig-height="600" class="tmblr-full"><img data-orig-width="600" data-orig-height="600" src="https://78.media.tumblr.com/a2f0815ec6639d7a321328c4034b7ac1/tumblr_na5cp6rPWh1qd33r3o1_1280.jpg"/></figure></blockquote>

<p>I have worked in fast food and let me tell you, there is nothing difficult about putting food in a frier and pressing a button. Easiest, and surprisingly favorite, job I’ve had. </p></blockquote>

<p>Lmao OP actually thinks you could put a couple of fry cooks in a board room and have them run the company.</p>

<p><a href="http://southernrepublicangirl.tumblr.com/post/140294842178/libertybill-phroyd-republicans-suck-as-human" class="tumblr_blog">...