Dressed Up
Dressed Up

Dressed Up

Tagging
Tagging

Tagging

Ends
Ends

Ends

Spreaded
Spreaded

Spreaded

Your
Your

Your

Fucked
Fucked

Fucked

Todays
Todays

Todays

Fucks
Fucks

Fucks

But
But

But

Try
Try

Try

🔥 | Latest

Fail, Fire, and Life: Teacher: You have to make an innocent computer game! Me: Hose/lose from zach gage loselose is a game about choice and consequence, and b what it means to sucoeed or fail You play the role of a space captain on a seemingly endless quest to dectroy aftacking aliens. You receive one point for each alien you kil You have one life, and if an allen touches you, you ill esplode. Tyou manage to kil al of the stera without dying, you wil win th game Authough loselose is a video-game, everything that happens whl while you play is rea Each aien is procedurally generated out of a Sie on your computer. When you kill an alen, the fie it was created from is destroyed On the other hand, if you are kiled, the applcation itat wil be di stroyed 00:54 Lose/Lose is a video-game with real life consequences. Each alien in the game is created based on a random file on the players computer. If the player kills the alien, the file it is based on is deleted. If the players ship is destroyed, the application itself is deleted Although touching aliens will cause the player to lose the game, and killing aliens awards points, the aliens will never actually fire at the player. This calls into question the player's mission, which is never explicitly stated, only hinted at through classic game mechanics. Is the player supposed to be an aggressor? Or merely an observer, traversing through a dangerous land? Why do we assume that because we are given a weapon an awarded for using it, that doing so is right? By way of exploring what it means to kill in a video-game, Lose/Lose broaches bigger questions. As technology grows, our understanding of it diminishes, yet, at the same time, it becomes increasingly important in our lives. At what point does our virtual data become as important to us as physical possessions? If we have reached that point already, what real objects do we value less than our data? What implications does trusting something so important to something we maderoviad menetichave? AH YES. MY FAVOURITE FRIENDLY COMPUTER GAME
Fail, Fire, and Life: Teacher: You have to make an innocent
 computer game!
 Me:
 Hose/lose
 from zach gage
 loselose is a game about choice and consequence, and b
 what it means to sucoeed or fail
 You play the role of a space captain on a seemingly endless quest to
 dectroy aftacking aliens. You receive one point for each alien you kil
 You have one life, and if an allen touches you, you ill esplode.
 Tyou manage to kil al of the stera without dying, you wil win th
 game
 Authough loselose is a video-game, everything that happens whl
 while you
 play is rea
 Each aien is procedurally generated out of a Sie on your computer.
 When you kill an alen, the fie it was created from is destroyed
 On the other hand, if you are kiled, the applcation itat wil be di
 stroyed
 00:54
 Lose/Lose is a video-game with real life consequences. Each alien in the
 game is created based on a random file on the players computer. If the player kills
 the alien, the file it is based on is deleted. If the players ship is destroyed, the
 application itself is deleted
 Although touching aliens will cause the player to lose the game, and killing aliens
 awards points, the aliens will never actually fire at the player. This calls into
 question the player's mission, which is never explicitly stated, only hinted at
 through classic game mechanics. Is the player supposed to be an aggressor? Or
 merely an observer, traversing through a dangerous land?
 Why do we assume that because we are given a weapon an awarded for using it,
 that doing so is right?
 By way of exploring what it means to kill in a video-game, Lose/Lose broaches
 bigger questions. As technology grows, our understanding of it diminishes, yet, at
 the same time, it becomes increasingly important in our lives. At what point does
 our virtual data become as important to us as physical possessions? If we have
 reached that point already, what real objects do we value less than our data?
 What implications does trusting something so important to something we
 maderoviad menetichave?
AH YES. MY FAVOURITE FRIENDLY COMPUTER GAME

AH YES. MY FAVOURITE FRIENDLY COMPUTER GAME

Being Alone, Cats, and Do It Again: CAT BEHAvioURS ExplAiNED CATS FACES 2) CAT WITH EARS UPRIGHT, SITTING UP AND ALERT 1) CAT WITH EARS 3) CAT WITH EARS FLAT BACK, EYES WIDE OPEN FORWARD Im pleased to see you.If you hold outyour handImight give it a mlistening intently. Was it a bird bump to say hello (or a sniffifIoramouse?Im not sure but Im Im feeling scared or anxious am shy) offtofindout CATS NOISES MIAOW! PURRRR! MYIP!MYIP! 4) PURR 5) CHIRRUP /MIAOW HellolWelcome home! Is my dinnerready yet? 6) CHATTERING AT THE WINDOW I purr because of most things (dinner strokes, sitting in sunshine but mainly because youúve given me some form of I've spottedpreyoutside the window but I dont think Ican catch it contact andI like it. CATs PoSTURES 7) CAT WITH BACK HUNCHED UP AND TAIL AND FUR ON END, 8) CAT SHOWING YOU ITS BEHIND 9) CAT ROLLING ON BACK TO EXPOSE STOMACH GROWLING OR HISSINC Dont be offended Im just being friendly We cats say hello toeach Itrust you but watchyour fingers Im being defensive.lim puffing other by sniffing tails, just like ifyou decide to give me a tickle,I dogs. my hair out to make myselflook bigger so whatever Im scaredof leaves me alone. might be in the mood to play. Why DoEs My CAT Do THAr? 10) CAT BRINGING A CIFT 12) CAT KNEADING 11) CAT RUBBING AGAINST A TABLE / PERSON Imgetting comfy, kneading you is just like needing mymum. Im trying to teach you howto hunt.See what a goodhunter am. This is my home andIscent things to find mywayaround. 13) CAT IN A BoX / BAG 14) MONORAIL CAT CAT 15) CAT FACE, SHOWING WITH NO LEGS This might look silly to you, but it makes me feel safe-Ican seeyou but you cant seeme! SLOW CLOSING OF EYES WHILST MAKING EYE CONTACT Im happy and relaxed You could call this mysphinx loaforeven monorail position. Youre getting akiss.Ifyou copy me, Imightjust do it again.Iflam in the mood Sainsbury's Bank simonalkenmayer: ceoolsson: americaninfographic: Cat Behavior a lot of people tend to confuse cats showing their belly for belly rubs, but it’s actually only something dogs do, for cats its a sign of respect and trust, they are not expecting to get pet, so when they do it’s not uncommon they get startled or think its play fight, of course there are expectations and some cats who ADORES belly rubs Nothing explains cats. Tumblr stop trying to make a liar out of me.
Being Alone, Cats, and Do It Again: CAT BEHAvioURS ExplAiNED
 CATS FACES
 2) CAT WITH EARS
 UPRIGHT, SITTING UP
 AND ALERT
 1) CAT WITH EARS
 3) CAT WITH EARS FLAT
 BACK, EYES WIDE OPEN
 FORWARD
 Im pleased to see you.If you hold
 outyour handImight give it a mlistening intently. Was it a bird
 bump to say hello (or a sniffifIoramouse?Im not sure but Im
 Im feeling scared or anxious
 am shy)
 offtofindout
 CATS NOISES
 MIAOW!
 PURRRR!
 MYIP!MYIP!
 4) PURR
 5) CHIRRUP /MIAOW
 HellolWelcome home! Is my
 dinnerready yet?
 6) CHATTERING AT THE
 WINDOW
 I purr because of most things
 (dinner strokes, sitting in
 sunshine but mainly because
 youúve given me some form of
 I've spottedpreyoutside the
 window but I dont think Ican
 catch it
 contact andI like it.

 CATs PoSTURES
 7) CAT WITH BACK
 HUNCHED UP AND TAIL
 AND FUR ON END,
 8) CAT SHOWING YOU ITS
 BEHIND
 9) CAT ROLLING ON
 BACK TO EXPOSE
 STOMACH
 GROWLING OR HISSINC Dont be offended Im just being
 friendly We cats say hello toeach Itrust you but watchyour fingers
 Im being defensive.lim puffing other by sniffing tails, just like ifyou decide to give me a tickle,I
 dogs.
 my hair out to make myselflook
 bigger so whatever Im scaredof
 leaves me alone.
 might be in the mood to play.

 Why DoEs My CAT Do THAr?
 10) CAT BRINGING A
 CIFT
 12) CAT KNEADING
 11) CAT RUBBING
 AGAINST A TABLE /
 PERSON
 Imgetting comfy, kneading you is
 just like needing mymum.
 Im trying to teach you howto
 hunt.See what a goodhunter
 am.
 This is my home andIscent
 things to find mywayaround.
 13) CAT IN A BoX / BAG 14) MONORAIL CAT CAT 15) CAT FACE, SHOWING
 WITH NO LEGS
 This might look silly to you, but it
 makes me feel safe-Ican seeyou
 but you cant seeme!
 SLOW CLOSING OF EYES
 WHILST MAKING EYE
 CONTACT
 Im happy and relaxed You could
 call this mysphinx loaforeven
 monorail position.
 Youre getting akiss.Ifyou copy
 me, Imightjust do it again.Iflam
 in the mood
 Sainsbury's Bank
simonalkenmayer:

ceoolsson:

americaninfographic:

Cat Behavior


a lot of people tend to confuse cats showing their belly for belly rubs, but it’s actually only something dogs do, for cats its a sign of respect and trust, they are not expecting to get pet, so when they do it’s not uncommon they get startled or think its play fight, of course there are expectations and some cats who ADORES belly rubs

Nothing explains cats. Tumblr stop trying to make a liar out of me.

simonalkenmayer: ceoolsson: americaninfographic: Cat Behavior a lot of people tend to confuse cats showing their belly for belly rubs, ...

Amazon, Drinking, and Food: nware Keyring: Easy Carrying) Magnet: Convenient Cleaner: Innovative Straw: Origin Silicone BPA FREE FDA Easier, Accurate and Durable Straw Cleaner Keyring Snap Hook Gefnware Gefinware Sas O Save Oceans lifepro-tips: Gerinware Reusable Collapsible Straws Curved 8.7 x 6mm - Perfect Silicone Drinking Straws for Smoothies, Juice, Coffee, 2-Pack with Individual Case and Cleaners 🍂 ECO-FRIENDLY BPA FREE: Made from 100% food grade silicone, it’s an FDA-approved reusable drinking straw. BPA and lead free. Friendly to environment and Harmless to human body. 🍂 FOLDABLE HANDY CARRY: This transportable straw comes with a creative design portable carrying case that will be more sanitary than tossing a straw in your bag. Easy open but secure protect your straw. 🍂 SOFT ANTI-SCALDING: Compare to metal straws, silicone straw does not transfer heat. You can use it sipping scalding coffee or hot tea. Good for straw-chewers and kids. 🍂 EASIER, ACCURATE DURABLE CLEANER: A new design straw cleaner is provided that can clean straw easier and more accurate than traditional straw cleaning brush. It’s dishwasher safe as well. 🍂 LARGE SMOOTHIE SIZED: 8.7 inches long x 6 mm in inner diameter which can reach the top of any cup and perfect for any drinks. Cut straw with scissors if you need short size for kids’ tumblers. Specifications:Available Colors: Green/ Pink/ Light Gray/ Deep BlueStraw Materials: Food Grade SiliconeCertification: FDA, BPA FreeStraw Size: 22 X 6mm Why Choose Silicone Straws?You may see a sea turtle getting a straw in its nose from TV or social media. One study published earlier this year estimated as many as 8.3 billion plastic straws pollute the world’s beaches. To protect the world’s ocean, it’s time to use reusable straws instead of plastic straws. Made from Non-toxic, food-grade silicone, Gerinware Reusable Straw is a healthy alternative to chemical-laden plastic. Silicone straws are soft, flexible and safe for hot and cold drinks. Easy to CleanEvery Silicone Straw comes with a special Cleaning Brush that helps with no fuss cleaning! The Cleaning Brush is also foldable to store in the convenient Travel Case. Silicone Straws react well to temperature and therefor you can sterilize it in boiling water after cleaning. They are also Dishwasher safe. 30%off code:9WO8VOJC, plus 5% coupon, 35% off in total.
Amazon, Drinking, and Food: nware
 Keyring: Easy Carrying)
 Magnet: Convenient
 Cleaner: Innovative
 Straw: Origin Silicone
 BPA
 FREE
 FDA
 Easier, Accurate and Durable Straw Cleaner

 Keyring
 Snap Hook
 Gefnware
 Gefinware

 Sas O
 Save Oceans
lifepro-tips:


Gerinware Reusable Collapsible Straws Curved 8.7 x 6mm - Perfect Silicone Drinking Straws for Smoothies, Juice, Coffee, 2-Pack with Individual Case and Cleaners


🍂 ECO-FRIENDLY  BPA FREE: Made from 100% food grade silicone, it’s an FDA-approved reusable drinking straw. BPA and lead free. Friendly to environment and Harmless to human body.
🍂 FOLDABLE  HANDY CARRY: This transportable straw comes with a creative design portable carrying case that will be more sanitary than tossing a straw in your bag. Easy open but secure protect your straw. 
🍂 SOFT  ANTI-SCALDING: Compare to metal straws, silicone straw does not transfer heat. You can use it sipping scalding coffee or hot tea. Good for straw-chewers and kids.
🍂 EASIER, ACCURATE  DURABLE CLEANER: A new design straw cleaner is provided that can clean straw easier and more accurate than traditional straw cleaning brush. It’s dishwasher safe as well.
🍂 LARGE  SMOOTHIE SIZED: 8.7 inches long x 6 mm in inner diameter which can reach the top of any cup and perfect for any drinks. Cut straw with scissors if you need short size for kids’ tumblers.
Specifications:Available Colors: Green/ Pink/ Light Gray/ Deep BlueStraw Materials: Food Grade SiliconeCertification: FDA, BPA FreeStraw Size: 22 X 6mm
Why Choose Silicone Straws?You may see a sea turtle getting a straw in its nose from TV or social media. One study published earlier this year estimated as many as 8.3 billion plastic straws pollute the world’s beaches. To protect the world’s ocean, it’s time to use reusable straws instead of plastic straws. Made from Non-toxic, food-grade silicone, Gerinware Reusable Straw is a healthy alternative to chemical-laden plastic. Silicone straws are soft, flexible and safe for hot and cold drinks.
Easy to CleanEvery Silicone Straw comes with a special Cleaning Brush that helps with no fuss cleaning! The Cleaning Brush is also foldable to store in the convenient Travel Case. Silicone Straws react well to temperature and therefor you can sterilize it in boiling water after cleaning. They are also Dishwasher safe.
30%off code:9WO8VOJC, plus 5% coupon, 35% off in total.

lifepro-tips: Gerinware Reusable Collapsible Straws Curved 8.7 x 6mm - Perfect Silicone Drinking Straws for Smoothies, Juice, Coffee, 2-Pa...

Amazon, Drinking, and Food: nware Keyring: Easy Carrying) Magnet: Convenient Cleaner: Innovative Straw: Origin Silicone BPA FREE FDA Easier, Accurate and Durable Straw Cleaner Keyring Snap Hook Gefnware Gefinware Sas O Save Oceans lifepro-tips: Gerinware Reusable Collapsible Straws Curved 8.7 x 6mm - Perfect Silicone Drinking Straws for Smoothies, Juice, Coffee, 2-Pack with Individual Case and Cleaners 🍂 ECO-FRIENDLY BPA FREE: Made from 100% food grade silicone, it’s an FDA-approved reusable drinking straw. BPA and lead free. Friendly to environment and Harmless to human body. 🍂 FOLDABLE HANDY CARRY: This transportable straw comes with a creative design portable carrying case that will be more sanitary than tossing a straw in your bag. Easy open but secure protect your straw. 🍂 SOFT ANTI-SCALDING: Compare to metal straws, silicone straw does not transfer heat. You can use it sipping scalding coffee or hot tea. Good for straw-chewers and kids. 🍂 EASIER, ACCURATE DURABLE CLEANER: A new design straw cleaner is provided that can clean straw easier and more accurate than traditional straw cleaning brush. It’s dishwasher safe as well. 🍂 LARGE SMOOTHIE SIZED: 8.7 inches long x 6 mm in inner diameter which can reach the top of any cup and perfect for any drinks. Cut straw with scissors if you need short size for kids’ tumblers. Specifications:Available Colors: Green/ Pink/ Light Gray/ Deep BlueStraw Materials: Food Grade SiliconeCertification: FDA, BPA FreeStraw Size: 22 X 6mm Why Choose Silicone Straws?You may see a sea turtle getting a straw in its nose from TV or social media. One study published earlier this year estimated as many as 8.3 billion plastic straws pollute the world’s beaches. To protect the world’s ocean, it’s time to use reusable straws instead of plastic straws. Made from Non-toxic, food-grade silicone, Gerinware Reusable Straw is a healthy alternative to chemical-laden plastic. Silicone straws are soft, flexible and safe for hot and cold drinks. Easy to CleanEvery Silicone Straw comes with a special Cleaning Brush that helps with no fuss cleaning! The Cleaning Brush is also foldable to store in the convenient Travel Case. Silicone Straws react well to temperature and therefor you can sterilize it in boiling water after cleaning. They are also Dishwasher safe. 30%off code:9WO8VOJC, plus 5% coupon, 35% off in total.
Amazon, Drinking, and Food: nware
 Keyring: Easy Carrying)
 Magnet: Convenient
 Cleaner: Innovative
 Straw: Origin Silicone
 BPA
 FREE
 FDA
 Easier, Accurate and Durable Straw Cleaner

 Keyring
 Snap Hook
 Gefnware
 Gefinware

 Sas O
 Save Oceans
lifepro-tips:


Gerinware Reusable Collapsible Straws Curved 8.7 x 6mm - Perfect Silicone Drinking Straws for Smoothies, Juice, Coffee, 2-Pack with Individual Case and Cleaners


🍂 ECO-FRIENDLY  BPA FREE: Made from 100% food grade silicone, it’s an FDA-approved reusable drinking straw. BPA and lead free. Friendly to environment and Harmless to human body.
🍂 FOLDABLE  HANDY CARRY: This transportable straw comes with a creative design portable carrying case that will be more sanitary than tossing a straw in your bag. Easy open but secure protect your straw. 
🍂 SOFT  ANTI-SCALDING: Compare to metal straws, silicone straw does not transfer heat. You can use it sipping scalding coffee or hot tea. Good for straw-chewers and kids.
🍂 EASIER, ACCURATE  DURABLE CLEANER: A new design straw cleaner is provided that can clean straw easier and more accurate than traditional straw cleaning brush. It’s dishwasher safe as well.
🍂 LARGE  SMOOTHIE SIZED: 8.7 inches long x 6 mm in inner diameter which can reach the top of any cup and perfect for any drinks. Cut straw with scissors if you need short size for kids’ tumblers.
Specifications:Available Colors: Green/ Pink/ Light Gray/ Deep BlueStraw Materials: Food Grade SiliconeCertification: FDA, BPA FreeStraw Size: 22 X 6mm
Why Choose Silicone Straws?You may see a sea turtle getting a straw in its nose from TV or social media. One study published earlier this year estimated as many as 8.3 billion plastic straws pollute the world’s beaches. To protect the world’s ocean, it’s time to use reusable straws instead of plastic straws. Made from Non-toxic, food-grade silicone, Gerinware Reusable Straw is a healthy alternative to chemical-laden plastic. Silicone straws are soft, flexible and safe for hot and cold drinks.
Easy to CleanEvery Silicone Straw comes with a special Cleaning Brush that helps with no fuss cleaning! The Cleaning Brush is also foldable to store in the convenient Travel Case. Silicone Straws react well to temperature and therefor you can sterilize it in boiling water after cleaning. They are also Dishwasher safe.
30%off code:9WO8VOJC, plus 5% coupon, 35% off in total.

lifepro-tips: Gerinware Reusable Collapsible Straws Curved 8.7 x 6mm - Perfect Silicone Drinking Straws for Smoothies, Juice, Coffee, 2-Pa...

Being Alone, America, and Click: Jason Fuller, Contributor Working to bring about the best in America, both on-line and off. Impeachment Is No Longer Enough; Donald Trump Must Face Justice Impeachment and removal from office are only the first steps; for treason and-if convicted in a court of law-executed. 06/11/2017 10:39 pm ET for America to be redeemed, Donald Trump must be prosecuted Donald Trump has been President of the United States for just shy of six months now. I think that most of us among the electorate knew that his presidency would be a relative disaster, but I am not sure how many among us expected the catastrophe our nation now faces. friendly-neighborhood-patriarch: hominishostilis: abstractandedgyname: siryouarebeingmocked: mississpithy: bogleech: notyourmoderate: angrybell: thinksquad: http://archive.is/5VvI5 Huffpo, everybody. Can someone tell me what high crime or misdemeanor Trump has committed that merits this? Or is the HuffPo just publishing outright fantasies? God dammit, I’m now in the position of defending Huffington. I didn’t want to be here. Okay, @angrybell … actually, @ literally everyone who reblogged this uncritically as a tacit endorsement and agreement. Such as @the-critical-feminist that I reblog this from.My first question has to be: are you serious? Don’t read that with a tone, don’t read that as an attack. That’s my first question: Are you asking a serious question about what high crimes or misdemeanors Trump has perpetrated? Are you asking a sincere question or is this the sort of rhetoric that doesn’t translate well into text? And, if you are actually asking this question, are ou going to hear the answer or are you going to immediately start concocting your counter-argument because you just know in your heart that anyone who disagrees with you must be wrong, so you start formulating a plan to prove them wrong before you actually hear what they have to say?Next: did you read the article that was posted in the link you responded to? Because the author of that article does a reasonable job of explaining their thought process behind the headline. Or did you lash out before you read the article? Okay, presuming that you did read the article in good faith, evaluate its points, perform the follow-up research to understand context, and still disagree with the central tenets and simply believe that the author’s reasoning does not hold up for whatever reasons you have chosen not to state, and you believe their source information is falsified for whatever reason you have chosen not to state, I will move on. After I have given you and yours every conceivable benefit of the doubt and every charitable assumption. Because if the article itself doesn’t convince you, there’s the fact that Donald Trump has broken literally every federal law against corruption and conflict of interest. Not one or two, not most, not all but a few. Literally every single law we have against corruption, from the Constitution to the informal guidelines circulated as a memo from the White House ethics scholars. He’s broken literally every one of those rules. He’s openly traded favors for money and favors for months now. Hell, that Chinese influence-peddler that paid him off for sixteen million dollars should have been enough to get him convicted of treason. Sharing code-word level classified information with a government on the opposite side of an ongoing military conflict isn’t *necessarily* treason, unless the information was part of a share program with an allied nation and wasn’t his to distribute. That’s aiding a foreign aggressor at the expense of a military ally, and that’s treason. Giving aid and comfort to enemies of the nation. Obstruction of justice is pretty clear-cut, that’s an impeachment, except that the justice in question is also a matter of national security, so that’s treason. Again. Defaming the former president? Misdemeanor, impeachable. The way he drags his heels nominating posts in Justice and State could be prosecuted as dereliction of duty. If he has tapes of Comey, he’s on the hook for contempt, if he doesn’t then he’s on the hook for witness tampering. Hell, deleting the covfefe tweet is destroying federal records, which is a misdemeanor, and impeachable. The man doesn’t go a week without bringing on an impeachable offense. Strictly speaking, every time he goes to Mar-A-Lago he’s committing grand larceny by fraud, because he’s taking millions of dollars of American funds for his own benefit, after promising not to do that. There are dozens, hundreds maybe, of impeachable offenses already in this 140 days, “high crimes and misdemeanors”. Actual counts of treason, punishable by death by hanging, is probably only five or six counts. Only five or six counts of high treason by our sitting president. His job does not put him above reproach. His job is to *be* above reproach. And he’s failing that job. Trump’s supporters probably believe he’s done nothing impeachable or treasonous because they spent eight years claiming on no grounds whatsoever that Obama was impeachable and treasonous, just because they didn’t like him. They now probably convince themselves that these facts about Trump are as fake as their Obama theories and they’ve ruined the gravity of these terms for themselves. “ His job does not put him above reproach. His job is to *be* above reproach. And he’s failing that job. “ I like how Bogleech doesn’t know many Trump supporters are former Obama supporters. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/04/us/obama-trump-swing-voters.html https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/10/16/17980820/trump-obama-2016-race-racism-class-economy-2018-midterm https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obama-Trump_voters It’s not even a secret. But why am I not surprised bogleech - that intellectual titan - failed to do basic research? And last time I checked, no nation required their politicans to be perfect. Which is what NYM is asking for with that quote; perfection. That’s what ‘above reproach’ means. An impossible standard, considering people “reproach” Trump for feeding fish wrong, for his skin color, for any and every little thing, even if they have to twist reality into a pretzel to do it. In fact, I’ve seen people take pictures of kids in cages from 2014, and blame Trump for it. So this: Are you asking a serious question about what high crimes or misdemeanors Trump has perpetrated? Is a question of this: Can someone tell me what high crime or misdemeanor Trump has committed that merits this? Seems you missed the part that says “merits this”. Next: did you read the article that was posted in the link you responded to? Because the author of that article does a reasonable job of explaining their thought process behind the headline. Or did you lash out before you read the article? (The underlined is in the subtitle, not the headline.) Okay, presuming that you did read the article in good faith, evaluate its points, perform the follow-up research to understand context, and still disagree with the central tenets… Context? Central tenets? Do you not know how highlighting works? You don’t need to know the context, or any other point, when you’re indicating a specific, explicit, and isolated quality. The subtitle called for Trump’s execution, we’re 5 paragraphs in and you haven’t even acknowledged that part yet. Or at all, I’m guessing, because I’m not reading further. You keep talking around it. You accuse others, preemptively, of not hearing the answer and pre-”concocting” a response, and yet you’re waffling on about shit around the one, sole, isolated thing that was indicated in the first place. This isn’t about ignoring context, this is about criticising one thing. Which is a thing people are allowed to do, by the way, just because people criticise one thing, doesn’t mean they’re criticising everything about the everyone involved, and everything said before, adjacent to, and after that one thing, and therefore are required to include all of those things in their consideration and assessment of this one thing. The specific criticism of the indicated quality is the advocation of Trump’s execution. That’s it. No context is needed to understand that this is what was said, especially since that which was said, which is being criticised, is explicit. No amount of, “So, click-bait subtitle that you don’t see until you’ve already clicked on the article link out of the way, here’s what I actually meant when I said I wanted this person tried and executed,” could excuse the use of that language, let alone actually believing in it. It’s like… it’s like if someone makes a typo, someone else is like, “Oh, seems you made a typo,” you’d jump in like, “But what about they’re perfectly reasonable spelling everywhere else? Hm? Forced to ignore contextual perfect spelling I see. They’re lack of typos everywhere else explains this typo, and vindicates it”. You and what’s his face, James, fuckin ReasonAndEmpathy or whatever now, y’all keep saying “but what of the context?” when the criterion of criticism is isolated, atomic, specific, and/or explicit. No amount of context invalidates the very specific, singular words explicitly spoken. “Sure he called for Trump to be executed, but he explains himself.” Fucking and? When did the death sentence become ok? When did that happen? Moderates are ok with the death sentence now? Aight, weird. Man this fucking post aged like fine wine, take a SIP Delicious This was quite a ride
Being Alone, America, and Click: Jason Fuller, Contributor
 Working to bring about the best in America, both on-line and off.
 Impeachment Is No Longer Enough;
 Donald Trump Must Face Justice
 Impeachment and removal from office are only the first steps;
 for treason and-if convicted in a court of law-executed.
 06/11/2017 10:39 pm ET
 for America to be redeemed, Donald Trump must be prosecuted
 Donald Trump has been President of the United States for just shy of six months now. I
 think that most of us among the electorate knew that his presidency would be a relative
 disaster, but I am not sure how many among us expected the catastrophe our nation now
 faces.
friendly-neighborhood-patriarch:

hominishostilis:

abstractandedgyname:
siryouarebeingmocked:

mississpithy:

bogleech:

notyourmoderate:

angrybell:

thinksquad:


http://archive.is/5VvI5


Huffpo, everybody. 




Can someone tell me what high crime or misdemeanor Trump has committed that merits this? Or is the HuffPo just publishing outright fantasies?

God dammit, I’m now in the position of defending Huffington. I didn’t want to be here. Okay, @angrybell … actually, @ literally everyone who reblogged this uncritically as a tacit endorsement and agreement. Such as @the-critical-feminist that I reblog this from.My first question has to be: are you serious? Don’t read that with a tone, don’t read that as an attack. That’s my first question: Are you asking a serious question about what high crimes or misdemeanors Trump has perpetrated? Are you asking a sincere question or is this the sort of rhetoric that doesn’t translate well into text? And, if you are actually asking this question, are ou going to hear the answer or are you going to immediately start concocting your counter-argument because you just know in your heart that anyone who disagrees with you must be wrong, so you start formulating a plan to prove them wrong before you actually hear what they have to say?Next: did you read the article that was posted in the link you responded to? Because the author of that article does a reasonable job of explaining their thought process behind the headline. Or did you lash out before you read the article? Okay, presuming that you did read the article in good faith, evaluate its points, perform the follow-up research to understand context, and still disagree with the central tenets and simply believe that the author’s reasoning does not hold up for whatever reasons you have chosen not to state, and you believe their source information is falsified for whatever reason you have chosen not to state, I will move on. After I have given you and yours every conceivable benefit of the doubt and every charitable assumption. Because if the article itself doesn’t convince you, there’s the fact that Donald Trump has broken literally every federal law against corruption and conflict of interest. Not one or two, not most, not all but a few. Literally every single law we have against corruption, from the Constitution to the informal guidelines circulated as a memo from the White House ethics scholars. He’s broken literally every one of those rules. He’s openly traded favors for money and favors for months now. Hell, that Chinese influence-peddler that paid him off for sixteen million dollars should have been enough to get him convicted of treason. Sharing code-word level classified information with a government on the opposite side of an ongoing military conflict isn’t *necessarily* treason, unless the information was part of a share program with an allied nation and wasn’t his to distribute. That’s aiding a foreign aggressor at the expense of a military ally, and that’s treason. Giving aid and comfort to enemies of the nation. Obstruction of justice is pretty clear-cut, that’s an impeachment, except that the justice in question is also a matter of national security, so that’s treason. Again. Defaming the former president? Misdemeanor, impeachable. The way he drags his heels nominating posts in Justice and State could be prosecuted as dereliction of duty. If he has tapes of Comey, he’s on the hook for contempt, if he doesn’t then he’s on the hook for witness tampering. Hell, deleting the covfefe tweet is destroying federal records, which is a misdemeanor, and impeachable. The man doesn’t go a week without bringing on an impeachable offense. Strictly speaking, every time he goes to Mar-A-Lago he’s committing grand larceny by fraud, because he’s taking millions of dollars of American funds for his own benefit, after promising not to do that. There are dozens, hundreds maybe, of impeachable offenses already in this 140 days, “high crimes and misdemeanors”. Actual counts of treason, punishable by death by hanging, is probably only five or six counts. Only five or six counts of high treason by our sitting president. His job does not put him above reproach. His job is to *be* above reproach. And he’s failing that job. 

Trump’s supporters probably believe he’s done nothing impeachable or treasonous because they spent eight years claiming on no grounds whatsoever that Obama was impeachable and treasonous, just because they didn’t like him. They now probably convince themselves that these facts about Trump are as fake as their Obama theories and they’ve ruined the gravity of these terms for themselves.





“

His job does not put him above reproach. His job is to *be* above reproach. And he’s failing that job.


“






I like how Bogleech doesn’t know many Trump supporters are former Obama supporters.
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/04/us/obama-trump-swing-voters.html
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/10/16/17980820/trump-obama-2016-race-racism-class-economy-2018-midterm
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obama-Trump_voters
It’s not even a secret. But why am I not surprised bogleech - that intellectual titan - failed to do basic research?
And last time I checked, no nation required their politicans to be perfect. Which is what NYM is asking for with that quote; perfection. That’s what ‘above reproach’ means. An impossible standard, considering people “reproach” Trump for feeding fish wrong, for his skin color, for any and every little thing, even if they have to twist reality into a pretzel to do it. In fact, I’ve seen people take pictures of kids in cages from 2014, and blame Trump for it.

So this:


Are you asking a serious question about what high crimes or misdemeanors Trump has perpetrated?


Is a question of this:


Can someone tell me what high crime or misdemeanor Trump has committed that merits this?


Seems you missed the part that says “merits this”.


Next: did you read the article that was posted in the link you responded to? Because the author of that article does a reasonable job of explaining their thought process behind the headline. Or did you lash out before you read the article? 


(The underlined is in the subtitle, not the headline.)


Okay, presuming that you did read the article in good faith, evaluate its points, perform the follow-up research to understand context, and still disagree with the central tenets…
Context? Central tenets? Do you not know how highlighting works? You don’t need to know the context, or any other point, when you’re indicating a specific, explicit, and isolated quality.
The subtitle called for Trump’s execution, we’re 5 paragraphs in and you haven’t even acknowledged that part yet. Or at all, I’m guessing, because I’m not reading further. You keep talking around it. You accuse others, preemptively, of not hearing the answer and pre-”concocting” a response, and yet you’re waffling on about shit around the one, sole, isolated thing that was indicated in the first place.
This isn’t about ignoring context, this is about criticising one thing. Which is a thing people are allowed to do, by the way, just because people criticise one thing, doesn’t mean they’re criticising everything about the everyone involved, and everything said before, adjacent to, and after that one thing, and therefore are required to include all of those things in their consideration and assessment of this one thing.
The specific criticism of the indicated quality is the advocation of Trump’s execution. That’s it. No context is needed to understand that this is what was said, especially since that which was said, which is being criticised, is explicit. No amount of, “So, click-bait subtitle that you don’t see until you’ve already clicked on the article link out of the way, here’s what I actually meant when I said I wanted this person tried and executed,” could excuse the use of that language, let alone actually believing in it.
It’s like… it’s like if someone makes a typo, someone else is like, “Oh, seems you made a typo,” you’d jump in like, “But what about they’re perfectly reasonable spelling everywhere else? Hm? Forced to ignore contextual perfect spelling I see. They’re lack of typos everywhere else explains this typo, and vindicates it”.
You and what’s his face, James, fuckin ReasonAndEmpathy or whatever now, y’all keep saying “but what of the context?” when the criterion of criticism is isolated, atomic, specific, and/or explicit. No amount of context invalidates the very specific, singular words explicitly spoken. “Sure he called for Trump to be executed, but he explains himself.” Fucking and? When did the death sentence become ok? When did that happen? Moderates are ok with the death sentence now? Aight, weird.


Man this fucking post aged like fine wine, take a SIP 

Delicious

This was quite a ride

friendly-neighborhood-patriarch: hominishostilis: abstractandedgyname: siryouarebeingmocked: mississpithy: bogleech: notyourmoderate: ...