Népotisme
Népotisme

Népotisme

You Go
You Go

You Go

The Fact That
The Fact That

The Fact That

Averagers
Averagers

Averagers

Crapping
Crapping

Crapping

What To Do
What To Do

What To Do

Trump Words
Trump Words

Trump Words

Cries In
Cries In

Cries In

Because Im
Because Im

Because Im

point
point

point

🔥 | Latest

God, Ignorant, and Love: HE WO MAN FE MALE HU MAN PER SON visual-poetry »swofehuperx by richard tipping (+) [vial mitosisisyourtosis men fabricated the idea that they are the default sex to compensate for their biological inferiority and general superfluousness this is not just the natural order this is the language of a patriarchal culture rhysiare Omg no, you are wrong on so many levels and as a linguist this makes me ache something terrible. In my linguistics dass in undergrad, we actually made fun of people who think like you along these lines and for good reason, because you are wholly ignorant and are choosing to spin narratives about things and fields which you know completely nothing about yet pretend you do. 1 She: This word evolved naturally from Old English from seo/heo which were just words to refer to feminine-female people evolving from Proto- Germanic words meaning that/there. He as a word evolved from the same ideas but Proto-Germanic words for thishere, Your idea of patriarchal language further falls apart when you compare this part of English to other Germanic languages, of which English is related, the words in German for he and she are 'er and sie", completely unrelated So it is by clear happenstance, not some patriarchal conspiracy that the words he and "she in English have similar form. 2. Woman: Oh god this one always gets my goat when people go for this one. Man did not used to mean "male", man used to mean humanity/human being, the old words in Old English for male adult person and female adult person were werman and wifman respectively, we can see this relation in words like werewolf and wife as being the remnants of the base "wer- and the base wif-. Woman evolved phonologically from the word wifman by natural processes where the 'f sound dropped and the became lax. Man dropped its wer stem for reasons mostly unknown but I can guarantee have nothing to do with patriarchy because phonological change has no basis in that. 3. Female: Male and Female actually come etymologically from two completely different words. Male comes from Old French masle which meant masculine, while Female came from Old French as well femella which meant young woman. This is another case, just like he and she where the words coincidentally ended up looking similar without having any direct correlation in historical linguistic processes to make them as such 4 Hman: This word etymologically derives from Proto-Indo- European "ghomon which means earthly being as opposed to heavenly being which would refer to gods. You have some small glimmer of hope here in that the word does eventually branch off into the word for man in some languages but this is still too small of a precedent to base any conspiratorial thinking like you are doing off of 5. Person: This one offends me the most, simply because I love the fuck out of Etruscan language and your continued ignorance just irks me at this point. Person derives from persona from Latin which meant the same meaning, which ultimately derived from phersu Etruscan for mask as Etruscans would often have theatre performers use masks to give identity to the performers. So never once did "person have any meaning to do with son So yes, this IS the natural order or language. Please never proselytise your faulty ideology and misandrist thinking within speaking about word origins and morphology again, as unless you actually do fact checking I will school the everloving hell out of you, stay in vour lane. Swofehuper He Man Male Manson
God, Ignorant, and Love: HE
 WO MAN
 FE MALE
 HU MAN
 PER SON
 visual-poetry
 »swofehuperx by richard tipping (+)
 [vial
 mitosisisyourtosis
 men fabricated the idea that they are the default sex to compensate for their
 biological inferiority and general superfluousness
 this is not just the natural order this is the language of a patriarchal culture
 rhysiare
 Omg no, you are wrong on so many levels and as a linguist this makes me
 ache something terrible. In my linguistics dass in undergrad, we actually made
 fun of people who think like you along these lines and for good reason,
 because you are wholly ignorant and are choosing to spin narratives about
 things and fields which you know completely nothing about yet pretend you do.
 1 She: This word evolved naturally from Old English from seo/heo which
 were just words to refer to feminine-female people evolving from Proto-
 Germanic words meaning that/there. He as a word evolved from the
 same ideas but Proto-Germanic words for thishere, Your idea of
 patriarchal language further falls apart when you compare this part of
 English to other Germanic languages, of which English is related, the
 words in German for he and she are 'er and sie", completely unrelated
 So it is by clear happenstance, not some patriarchal conspiracy that the
 words he and "she in English have similar form.
 2. Woman: Oh god this one always gets my goat when people go for this
 one. Man did not used to mean "male", man used to
 mean humanity/human being, the old words in Old English for male
 adult person and female adult person were werman and wifman
 respectively, we can see this relation in words like werewolf and wife as
 being the remnants of the base "wer- and the base wif-. Woman
 evolved phonologically from the word wifman by natural processes
 where the 'f sound dropped and the became lax. Man dropped
 its wer stem for reasons mostly unknown but I can guarantee have
 nothing to do with patriarchy because phonological change has no
 basis in that.
 3. Female: Male and Female actually come etymologically from two
 completely different words. Male comes from Old French masle which
 meant masculine, while Female came from Old French as well femella
 which meant young woman. This is another case, just like he and she
 where the words coincidentally ended up looking similar without having
 any direct correlation in historical linguistic processes to make them as
 such
 4 Hman: This word etymologically derives from Proto-Indo-
 European "ghomon which means earthly being as opposed to heavenly
 being which would refer to gods. You have some small glimmer of hope
 here in that the word does eventually branch off into the word for man
 in some languages but this is still too small of a precedent to base any
 conspiratorial thinking like you are doing off of
 5. Person: This one offends me the most, simply because I love the fuck
 out of Etruscan language and your continued ignorance just irks me at
 this point. Person derives from persona from Latin which meant the
 same meaning, which ultimately derived from phersu Etruscan
 for mask as Etruscans would often have theatre performers use masks
 to give identity to the performers. So never once did "person have any
 meaning to do with son So yes, this IS the natural order or language.
 Please never proselytise your faulty ideology and misandrist thinking within
 speaking about word origins and morphology again, as unless you actually do
 fact checking I will school the everloving hell out of you, stay in vour lane.
Swofehuper He Man Male Manson

Swofehuper He Man Male Manson

Anaconda, Google, and Lgbt: Infanta Muerte @GeekRemix 9m *Pretends to be shocked part 3: Return of the homophobia* @Team YouTube@YouTube gay HD Oct 8, 2017 11:42 AM 0 views o Edit 0:38 Not suitable for most advertisers Request review Team YouTube @TeamYouTube Follow Replying to @GeekRemix Hi. If you think our system got it wrong, please appeal so an expert can review Here's more on the appeals process Update on monetization appeal and the appeals process Posted 9/5/17 3:19 PM, 84 messages productforums.google.com 2:02 PM-8 Oct 2017 Infanta Muerte @GeekRemix 2m Replying to @Team YouTube Excuse me but that was the most dismissive thing I have ever seen in my life. Fix the homophobic algorithm and don't but the work on me. 4 Infanta Muerte GeekRemix 1m 'Replying to @TeamYouTube Fix the blatant homophobia for LGBT+ terms for videos that are completely blank and private. This is 100% on you and only you. Infanta Muerte @GeekRemix 4m How am I supposed to appeal the fact that you auto flag LGBT+ terms and then throttle the views? it shouldn't happen in the first place. Team YouTube Φ @TeamYouTube Replying to @GeekRemix Hi. If you think our system got it wrong, please appeal so an expert can review. Here's more on the appeals process: goo.g/jvTDg4 Infanta Muerte @GeekRemix Additionally the FACT that more and more LGBT+ terms are being flagged as not suitable is 100% YOUR fault. YOU fix it. #LGBT #Youtube Team YouTube. @TeamYouTube Replying to @GeekRemix Hi. If you think our system got it wrong, please appeal so an expert can review. Here's more on the appeals process: goo.gl/jvTDg4 2:09 PM-8 Oct 2017 gay HD Oct 8, 2017 11:42 AM 0 views Edit 0:38 Not suitable for most advertisers transgender HD Sep 20, 2017 2:38 PM 0 views Not suitable for all advertisers Request review Edit 0:38 cisgender HD Sep 20, 2017 2:44 PM 0 views Editv 0:38 Straight couple H Sep 18, 2017 7:39 AM 0 views Edit 0:46 lesbian couple HD Sep 18, 2017 7:44 AM 0 views Not suitable for all advertisers Request review Edit v 0:46 bass-borot: geekremixalot: geekremix: links https://twitter.com/GeekRemix/status/917134851085619200 https://twitter.com/GeekRemix/status/917132350294822912 https://twitter.com/GeekRemix/status/917135357392687104 retweet these. don’t let them shut you up. fight. bring this to the attention of everyone.  REMINDER THAT MORE AND MORE LGBT+ TERMS ARE BEING ADDED TO THE AUTO FLAG LIST EVERY DAY! WHEN A VIDEO IS FLAGGED IT LOSES MONEY, BUT IT IS ALSO THEN THROTTLED FOR VIEWS SO PEOPLE DON’T SEE IT. YOUTUBE IS LITERALLY ERASING GAY CONTENT. If a video cannot meet the 1,000 views per week threshold required for manual review, then you have no chance of overturning YouTube’s autoflag system.  YouTube telling creators to “please appeal if you think we got it wrong” does NOTHING to help smaller creators and older content that get less than 1,000 views a week.
Anaconda, Google, and Lgbt: Infanta Muerte @GeekRemix 9m
 *Pretends to be shocked part 3: Return of the homophobia*
 @Team YouTube@YouTube
 gay HD
 Oct 8, 2017 11:42 AM
 0 views o
 Edit
 0:38
 Not suitable for most advertisers
 Request review
 Team YouTube
 @TeamYouTube
 Follow
 Replying to @GeekRemix
 Hi. If you think our system got it wrong,
 please appeal so an expert can review
 Here's more on the appeals process
 Update on monetization appeal and the appeals process
 Posted 9/5/17 3:19 PM, 84 messages
 productforums.google.com
 2:02 PM-8 Oct 2017

 Infanta Muerte @GeekRemix 2m
 Replying to @Team YouTube
 Excuse me but that was the most dismissive thing I have ever seen in my life. Fix
 the homophobic algorithm and don't but the work on me.
 4
 Infanta Muerte GeekRemix 1m
 'Replying to @TeamYouTube
 Fix the blatant homophobia for LGBT+ terms for videos that are completely blank
 and private. This is 100% on you and only you.

 Infanta Muerte @GeekRemix 4m
 How am I supposed to appeal the fact that you auto flag LGBT+ terms and then
 throttle the views? it shouldn't happen in the first place.
 Team YouTube Φ @TeamYouTube
 Replying to @GeekRemix
 Hi. If you think our system got it wrong, please appeal so an expert can
 review. Here's more on the appeals process: goo.g/jvTDg4

 Infanta Muerte
 @GeekRemix
 Additionally the FACT that more and more
 LGBT+ terms are being flagged as not
 suitable is 100% YOUR fault. YOU fix it.
 #LGBT #Youtube
 Team YouTube. @TeamYouTube
 Replying to @GeekRemix
 Hi. If you think our system got it wrong, please appeal so an expert can review.
 Here's more on the appeals process: goo.gl/jvTDg4
 2:09 PM-8 Oct 2017

 gay HD
 Oct 8, 2017 11:42 AM
 0 views
 Edit
 0:38
 Not suitable for most advertisers
 transgender HD
 Sep 20, 2017 2:38 PM
 0 views
 Not suitable for all advertisers
 Request review
 Edit
 0:38
 cisgender HD
 Sep 20, 2017 2:44 PM
 0 views
 Editv
 0:38
 Straight couple H
 Sep 18, 2017 7:39 AM
 0 views
 Edit
 0:46
 lesbian couple HD
 Sep 18, 2017 7:44 AM
 0 views
 Not suitable for all advertisers
 Request review
 Edit v
 0:46
bass-borot:

geekremixalot:
geekremix:

links
https://twitter.com/GeekRemix/status/917134851085619200
https://twitter.com/GeekRemix/status/917132350294822912
https://twitter.com/GeekRemix/status/917135357392687104
retweet these. don’t let them shut you up. fight. bring this to the attention of everyone. 
REMINDER THAT MORE AND MORE LGBT+ TERMS ARE BEING ADDED TO THE AUTO FLAG LIST EVERY DAY! WHEN A VIDEO IS FLAGGED IT LOSES MONEY, BUT IT IS ALSO THEN THROTTLED FOR VIEWS SO PEOPLE DON’T SEE IT.
YOUTUBE IS LITERALLY ERASING GAY CONTENT.

If a video cannot meet the 1,000 views per week threshold required for manual review, then you have no chance of overturning YouTube’s autoflag system. 
YouTube telling creators to “please appeal if you think we got it wrong” does NOTHING to help smaller creators and older content that get less than 1,000 views a week.

bass-borot: geekremixalot: geekremix: links https://twitter.com/GeekRemix/status/917134851085619200 https://twitter.com/GeekRemix/status/9...