But What
But What

But What

Some
Some

Some

Nicholas Cruz
Nicholas Cruz

Nicholas Cruz

Are
Are

Are

Such As
Such As

Such As

Didnt
Didnt

Didnt

While
While

While

Without
Without

Without

Trying To Understand
Trying To Understand

Trying To Understand

Many
Many

Many

🔥 | Latest

Conceptual: philomena-famulok: ©Philomena Famulok conceptual work (2019) with photographs from my personal family archive.
Conceptual: philomena-famulok:


©Philomena Famulok


conceptual work (2019) with photographs from my personal family archive.

philomena-famulok: ©Philomena Famulok conceptual work (2019) with photographs from my personal family archive.

Conceptual: 21 Answers votes oldest newest You can't parse [X]HTML with regex. Because HTML can't be parsed by regex. Regex is not a tool that can be used to correctly parse HTML. As I have answered in HTML-and-regex questions here so many times before, the use of regex will not allow you to consume HTML. Regular expressions are a tool that is insufficiently sophisticated to understand the constructs employed by HTML. HTML is not a regular language and hence cannot be parsed by regular expressions. Regex queries are not equipped to break down HTML into its meaningful parts. so many times but it is not getting to me. Even enhanced irregular regular expressions as used by Perl are not up to the task of parsing HTML. You will never make me crack. HTML is a language of sufficient complexity that it cannot be parsed by regular expressions. Even Jon Skeet cannot parse HTML using regular expressions. Every time you attempt to parse HTML with regular expressions, the unholy child weeps the blood of virgins, and Russian hackers pwn your webapp. Parsing HTML with regex summons tainted souls into the realm of the living. HTML and regex go together like love, marriage, and ritual infanticide. The <center> cannot hold it is too late. The force of regex and HTML together in the same conceptual space will destroy your mind like so much watery putty. If you parse HTML with regex you are giving in to Them and their blasphemous ways which doom us all to inhuman toil for the One whose Name cannot be expressed in the Basic Multilingual Plane, he comes. HTML-plus-regexp will liquify the nerves of the sentient whilst you observe, your psyche withering in the onslaught of horror. Regex-based HTML parsers are the cancer that is killing StackOverflow it is too late it is too late we cannot be saved the trangession of a child ensures regex will consume all living tissue (except for HTML which it cannot, as previously prophesied) dear lord help us how can anyone survive this scourge using regex to parse HTML has doomed humanity to an eternity of dread torture and security holes using regex as a tool to process HTML establishes a breach between this world and the dread realm of čorrupt entities (like SGML entities, but more corrupt) a mere glimpse of the world of reg ex parsers for HTML will instantly transport a programmer's consciousness into a world of ceaseless screaming, he comes-the pestilent slithy regex-infection will devour your HTML parser, application and existence for all time like Vişual Basic only worse he comes he comes do not fight he comes, his uņholy radiance destroping all enlightenment, HTML tags leaking frọm your eyesiike liquid pain, the song of regular expression parsing-will extinguish the voices of mortal man from the sphere I can see it can you see t it is beautiful the f inal snuf fing of the lies of Man ALL ĮS LOSTALL IS LOST the pony he comes he comes hejcemes the ichor permeates al MY FACEFACEh god no NO NOOoo Ne stop the an ges aře not reâj ZALGO IS TON THË PONY, HECOMES 1811 Have you tried using an XML parser instead? link edit flag edited Nov 14 at 0:18 community wiki bobince regex and html
Conceptual: 21 Answers
 votes
 oldest
 newest
 You can't parse [X]HTML with regex. Because HTML can't be parsed by regex. Regex is not a tool that
 can be used to correctly parse HTML. As I have answered in HTML-and-regex questions here so many
 times before, the use of regex will not allow you to consume HTML. Regular expressions are a tool that is
 insufficiently sophisticated to understand the constructs employed by HTML. HTML is not a regular
 language and hence cannot be parsed by regular expressions. Regex queries are not equipped to break
 down HTML into its meaningful parts. so many times but it is not getting to me. Even enhanced irregular
 regular expressions as used by Perl are not up to the task of parsing HTML. You will never make me
 crack. HTML is a language of sufficient complexity that it cannot be parsed by regular expressions. Even
 Jon Skeet cannot parse HTML using regular expressions. Every time you attempt to parse HTML with
 regular expressions, the unholy child weeps the blood of virgins, and Russian hackers pwn your webapp.
 Parsing HTML with regex summons tainted souls into the realm of the living. HTML and regex go together
 like love, marriage, and ritual infanticide. The <center> cannot hold it is too late. The force of regex and
 HTML together in the same conceptual space will destroy your mind like so much watery putty. If you
 parse HTML with regex you are giving in to Them and their blasphemous ways which doom us all to
 inhuman toil for the One whose Name cannot be expressed in the Basic Multilingual Plane, he comes.
 HTML-plus-regexp will liquify the nerves of the sentient whilst you observe, your psyche withering in the
 onslaught of horror. Regex-based HTML parsers are the cancer that is killing StackOverflow it is too late
 it is too late we cannot be saved the trangession of a child ensures regex will consume all living tissue
 (except for HTML which it cannot, as previously prophesied) dear lord help us how can anyone survive
 this scourge using regex to parse HTML has doomed humanity to an eternity of dread torture and
 security holes using regex as a tool to process HTML establishes a breach between this world and the
 dread realm of čorrupt entities (like SGML entities, but more corrupt) a mere glimpse of the world of reg
 ex parsers for HTML will instantly transport a programmer's consciousness into a world of ceaseless
 screaming, he comes-the pestilent slithy regex-infection will devour your HTML parser, application and
 existence for all time like Vişual Basic only worse he comes he comes do not fight he comes, his uņholy
 radiance destroping all enlightenment, HTML tags leaking frọm your eyesiike liquid pain, the song of
 regular expression parsing-will extinguish the voices of mortal man from the sphere I can see it can you
 see t it is beautiful the f inal snuf fing of the lies of Man ALL ĮS LOSTALL IS LOST the pony he
 comes he comes hejcemes the ichor permeates al MY FACEFACEh god no NO NOOoo Ne
 stop the an ges aře not reâj ZALGO IS TON THË PONY, HECOMES
 1811
 Have you tried using an XML parser instead?
 link edit flag
 edited Nov 14 at 0:18
 community wiki
 bobince
regex and html

regex and html

Conceptual: You can't parse [X]HTML with regex. Because HTML can't be parsed by regex. Regex is not a tool that can be used to correctly parse HTML. As I have answered in HTML-and-regex questions here so many times before, the use of regex will not allow you to consume HTML. Regular expressions are a tool that is insufficiently sophisticated to understand the constructs employed by HTML. HTML is not a regular language and hence cannot be parsed by regular expressions. Regex queries are not equipped to break down HTML into its meaningful parts. so many times but it is not getting to me. Even enhanced irregular regular expressions as used by Perl are not up to the task of parsing HTML. You will never make me crack. HTML is a language of sufficient complexity that it cannot be parsed by regular expressions. Even Jon Skeet cannot parse HTML using regular expressions Every time you attempt to parse HTML with regular expressions, the unholy child weeps the blood of virgins, and Russian hackers pwn your webapp. Parsing HTML with regex summons tainted souls into the realm of the living. HTML and regex go together like love, marriage, and ritual infanticide The <center> cannot hold it is too late. The force of regex and HTML together in the same conceptual space will destroy your mind like so much watery putty. If you parse HTML with regex you are giving in to Them and their blasphemous ways which doom us all to inhuman toil for the One whose Name cannot be expressed in the Basic Multilingual Plane, he comes. HTML-plus regexp will liquify the neryes of the sentient whilst you observe, your psyche withering in the onslaught of horror. Regex-based HTML parsers are the cancer that is killing StackOverflow it is too late it is too late we cannot be saved the trangession of a child ensures regex will consume all living tissue (except for HTML which it cannot, as previously prophesied) dear lord help us how car anyone survive this scourge using regex to parse HTML has doomed humanity to an eternity of dread torture and security holes using regex as a tool to process HTML establishes a breach between this world and the dread realm of cörrupt entities (like SGML entities, but more corrupt) a mere glimpse of the world of regex parsers for HTML will instantly transport a programmer's consciousness into a world of ceaseless screaming, he comes,the pestilent slithy regex-infection wil I devour your HTML parser, application and existence for all time like Visual Bąsic only worse he comes he comes do not fight he comes, his unholy radiance destroying all enlightenment, HTML tags leakjng frqm your eyes/like liquid pain, the song of regular expressien parsing-will extinguish the voices of mortal man from the sphgre I can see it can you see i it is beautiful the f inal 4421 snuf fing of the lies of Man ALL IS LOST ALL IS LOST the pory he comes he comese comes tge ichor permeates all MY FACE MY F Fish god no NO NOOOO ΝΘ stop the anges . ạre not rea) ZALGo is TOM) THE PONY HEgOMES Unicöde
Conceptual: You can't parse [X]HTML with regex. Because HTML can't be parsed by regex. Regex is not a tool
 that can be used to correctly parse HTML. As I have answered in HTML-and-regex questions here
 so many times before, the use of regex will not allow you to consume HTML. Regular expressions
 are a tool that is insufficiently sophisticated to understand the constructs employed by HTML. HTML
 is not a regular language and hence cannot be parsed by regular expressions. Regex queries are
 not equipped to break down HTML into its meaningful parts. so many times but it is not getting to
 me. Even enhanced irregular regular expressions as used by Perl are not up to the task of parsing
 HTML. You will never make me crack. HTML is a language of sufficient complexity that it cannot be
 parsed by regular expressions. Even Jon Skeet cannot parse HTML using regular expressions
 Every time you attempt to parse HTML with regular expressions, the unholy child weeps the blood of
 virgins, and Russian hackers pwn your webapp. Parsing HTML with regex summons tainted souls
 into the realm of the living. HTML and regex go together like love, marriage, and ritual infanticide
 The <center> cannot hold it is too late. The force of regex and HTML together in the same
 conceptual space will destroy your mind like so much watery putty. If you parse HTML with regex
 you are giving in to Them and their blasphemous ways which doom us all to inhuman toil for the
 One whose Name cannot be expressed in the Basic Multilingual Plane, he comes. HTML-plus
 regexp will liquify the neryes of the sentient whilst you observe, your psyche withering in the
 onslaught of horror. Regex-based HTML parsers are the cancer that is killing StackOverflow it is too
 late it is too late we cannot be saved the trangession of a child ensures regex will consume all living
 tissue (except for HTML which it cannot, as previously prophesied) dear lord help us how car
 anyone survive this scourge using regex to parse HTML has doomed humanity to an eternity of
 dread torture and security holes using regex as a tool to process HTML establishes a breach
 between this world and the dread realm of cörrupt entities (like SGML entities, but more corrupt) a
 mere glimpse of the world of regex parsers for HTML will instantly transport a programmer's
 consciousness into a world of ceaseless screaming, he comes,the pestilent slithy regex-infection wil
 I devour your HTML parser, application and existence for all time like Visual Bąsic only worse he
 comes he comes do not fight he comes, his unholy radiance destroying all enlightenment, HTML
 tags leakjng frqm your eyes/like liquid pain, the song of regular expressien parsing-will extinguish
 the voices of mortal man from the sphgre I can see it can you see i it is beautiful the f inal
 4421
 snuf fing of the lies of Man ALL IS LOST ALL IS LOST the pory he comes he comese comes
 tge ichor permeates all MY FACE MY F Fish god no NO NOOOO ΝΘ stop the anges . ạre not
 rea) ZALGo is TOM) THE PONY HEgOMES
Unicöde

Unicöde

Conceptual: You can't parse [X]HTML with regex. Because HTML can't be parsed by regex. Regex is not a tool that can be used to correctly parse HTML. As I have answered in HTML-and-regex questions here so many times before, the use of regex will not allow you to consume HTML. Regular expressions are a tool that is insufficiently sophisticated to understand the constructs employed by HTML. HTML is not a regular language and hence cannot be parsed by regular expressions. Regex queries are not equipped to break down HTML into its meaningful parts. so many times but it is not getting to me. Even enhanced irregular regular expressions as used by Perl are not up to the task of parsing HTML. You will never make me crack. HTML is a language of sufficient complexity that it cannot be parsed by regular expressions. Even Jon Skeet cannot parse HTML using regular expressions. Every time you attempt to parse HTML with regular expressions, the unholy child weeps the blood of virgins, and Russian hackers pwn your webapp. Parsing HTML with regex summons tainted souls into the realm of the living. HTML and regex go together like love, marriage, and ritual infanticide The <center> cannot hold it is too late. The force of regex and HTML together in the same conceptual space will destroy your mind like so much watery putty. If you parse HTML with regex you are giving in to Them and their blasphemous ways which doom us all to inhuman toil for the One whose Name cannot be expressed in the Basic Multilingual Plane, he comes. HTML-plus regexp will liquify the neryes of the sentient whilst you observe, your psyche withering in the onslaught of horror. Regēx-based HTML parsers are the cancer that is killing StackOverflow it is too late it is too late we cannot be saved the trangession of a child ensures regex will consume all living tissue (except for HTML which it cannot, as previously prophesied) dear lord help us how can anyone survive this scourge using regex to parse HTML has doomed humanity to an eternity of dread torture and security holes using regex as a tool to process HTML establishes a breach between this world and the dread realm of corrupt entities (like SGML entities, but more corrupt) a mere glimpse of the world of regex parsers for HTML will instantly transport a programmer's consciousness into a world of ceaseless screaming, he comes, the pestilent-slithy regex-infection wil I devour your HTML parser, application and existence for all time like Visual Basic only worse he comes he comes do not fight he comøs, his unholy radiañcé destroying all enlightenment, HTML tags leaking from your eyeslike liquid pain, the song of regular expressien parsing-will extinguish the voices of mortal man from the sphgre I can see it can you see ft it is beautiful the f inal snuf fing of the lies of Man ALL ISLOSTALL IS LOST the pony h comes he com t egichor permeates al My FACE tyEACE b god no NO NOOOO NO stop the an les are not 4422 DA Have you tried using an XML parser instead? How do I replace XHTML tags with RegEx?
Conceptual: You can't parse [X]HTML with regex. Because HTML can't be parsed by regex. Regex is not a tool
 that can be used to correctly parse HTML. As I have answered in HTML-and-regex questions here
 so many times before, the use of regex will not allow you to consume HTML. Regular expressions
 are a tool that is insufficiently sophisticated to understand the constructs employed by HTML. HTML
 is not a regular language and hence cannot be parsed by regular expressions. Regex queries are
 not equipped to break down HTML into its meaningful parts. so many times but it is not getting to
 me. Even enhanced irregular regular expressions as used by Perl are not up to the task of parsing
 HTML. You will never make me crack. HTML is a language of sufficient complexity that it cannot be
 parsed by regular expressions. Even Jon Skeet cannot parse HTML using regular expressions.
 Every time you attempt to parse HTML with regular expressions, the unholy child weeps the blood of
 virgins, and Russian hackers pwn your webapp. Parsing HTML with regex summons tainted souls
 into the realm of the living. HTML and regex go together like love, marriage, and ritual infanticide
 The <center> cannot hold it is too late. The force of regex and HTML together in the same
 conceptual space will destroy your mind like so much watery putty. If you parse HTML with regex
 you are giving in to Them and their blasphemous ways which doom us all to inhuman toil for the
 One whose Name cannot be expressed in the Basic Multilingual Plane, he comes. HTML-plus
 regexp will liquify the neryes of the sentient whilst you observe, your psyche withering in the
 onslaught of horror. Regēx-based HTML parsers are the cancer that is killing StackOverflow it is too
 late it is too late we cannot be saved the trangession of a child ensures regex will consume all living
 tissue (except for HTML which it cannot, as previously prophesied) dear lord help us how can
 anyone survive this scourge using regex to parse HTML has doomed humanity to an eternity of
 dread torture and security holes using regex as a tool to process HTML establishes a breach
 between this world and the dread realm of corrupt entities (like SGML entities, but more corrupt) a
 mere glimpse of the world of regex parsers for HTML will instantly transport a programmer's
 consciousness into a world of ceaseless screaming, he comes, the pestilent-slithy regex-infection wil
 I devour your HTML parser, application and existence for all time like Visual Basic only worse he
 comes he comes do not fight he comøs, his unholy radiañcé destroying all enlightenment, HTML
 tags leaking from your eyeslike liquid pain, the song of regular expressien parsing-will extinguish
 the voices of mortal man from the sphgre I can see it can you see ft it is beautiful the f inal
 snuf fing of the lies of Man ALL ISLOSTALL IS LOST the pony h comes he com
 t egichor permeates al My FACE tyEACE b god no NO NOOOO NO stop the an les are not
 4422
 DA
 Have you tried using an XML parser instead?
How do I replace XHTML tags with RegEx?

How do I replace XHTML tags with RegEx?

Conceptual: CNN @CNN CAN Plan Bee' is a personal robotic bee designed to mimic how bees pollinate flowers and crops cnn.it/21QKbuY jaküb @sadandchildish instead of saving the environment and helping actual bees let's spend billions on robots that do what bees would do for free CNN @CNN Plan Bee' is a personal robotic bee designed to mimic how bees pollinate flowers and crops cnn.it/21QKbuY chuppa-thingy: curlicuecal: pts-m-d: thetrippytrip: dont you just love capitalism..   Black Mirror predicted this we are all goona die my god but I get mad when someone flippantly dismisses important scientific progress because you can make it sound dumb by framing it the right way. For a start, of course a lot of science sounds dumb.  Science is all in the slogging through the minutiae, the failures, the tedious process of filling in the blank spaces on the map because it ain’t ’t glamorous, but if someone doesn’t do it, no one gets to know for sure what’s there. Someone’s gotta spend their career measuring fly genitalia under a microscope. Frankly, I’m grateful to the person who is tackling that tedium, because if they didn’t, I might have to, and I don’t wanna. But let’s talk about why we should care about this particular science and spend money on it. (And I’ll even answer without even glancing at the article.) Off the top of my head? -advances in robotics -advances in miniature robotics -advances in flight technology -advantages in simulating and understanding the mechanics and programming of small intelligences -ability to grow crops in places uninhabitable by insects (space? cold/hot? places where honeybees are non-native and detrimental to the ecosystem?) -ability to improve productivity density of crops and feed more people -less strain on bees, who do poorly when forced to pollinate monocultures of low nutrition plants -ability to run tightly controlled experiments on pollination, on the effects of bees on plant physiology, on ecosystem dynamics, etc -fucking robot bees, my friend -hahaha think how confused those flowers must be Also worth keeping in mind? People love, love, love framing science in condescending and silly sounding terms as an excuse to cut funding to vital programs. *Especially* if it’s also associated with something (gasp) ‘inappropriate’, like sex or ladyparts. This is why research for a lot of women’s issues, lgbtq+ issues, minorities’ issues, and vulnerable groups in general’s issues tends to lag so far behind the times. This is why some groups are pushing so hard to cut funding for climate change research these days. Anything that’s acquired governmental funding has been through an intensely competitive, months-to-years long screening by EXPERTS IN THE FIELD who have a very good idea what research is likely to be most beneficial to that field and fill a needed gap. Trust me.  The paperwork haunts my nightmares. So, we had a joke in my lab: “Nice work, college boy.” It was the phrase for any project that you could spend years and years working on and end up with results that could be summed up on a single, pretty slide with an apparently obvious graph. The phrase was taken from something a grower said at a talk my advisor gave as a graduate student: “So you proved that plants grow better when they’re watered? Nice work, college boy.” But like, the thing is? There’s always more details than that. And a lot of times it’s important that somebody questions our assumptions.  A labmate of mine doing very similar research demonstrated that our assumptions about the effect of water stress on plant fitness have been wrong for years because *nobody had thought to separate out the different WAYS a plant can be water stressed.* (Continuously, in bursts, etc.). And it turns out these ways have *drastically different effects* with drastically different measures required for response to them to keep from losing lots of money and resources in agriculture. Nice work, college boy. :p Point the second: surprise! Anna Haldewang is an industrial design student.  She developed this in her product design class.  And, as far as I can tell, she has had no particular funding at all for this project, much less billions of dollars.  ‘grats, Anna, you FUCKING ROCK. ps: On a lighter note, summarizing research to make it sound stupid is both easy AND fun. Check out @lolmythesis – I HIGHLY RECOMMEND. :33 Okay, so I actually know Anna. She is my classmate and my friend, and I know this project quite well. And I could not have put the above statement any better. Here’s the thing guys, bumblebees are endangered, but they have a very important roll in our ecosystem. While we are doing everything we can to stabalize the bee populations, we also have to make sure that an important job is being done in our ecosystem. This drone was a conceptual way to aid that as we work to stabalize bee populations. I have never been so mad at Tumblr before. This is a huge accomplishment for a student, let alone a female in our male dominated industry. Stop shitting on everything, it doesn’t make you cool. Oh and actually read into things before you go tearing them apart.
Conceptual: CNN
 @CNN
 CAN
 Plan Bee' is a personal robotic bee designed
 to mimic how bees pollinate flowers and crops
 cnn.it/21QKbuY

 jaküb
 @sadandchildish
 instead of saving the environment and helping
 actual bees let's spend billions on robots that
 do what bees would do for free
 CNN @CNN
 Plan Bee' is a personal robotic bee designed to mimic how bees
 pollinate flowers and crops cnn.it/21QKbuY
chuppa-thingy:

curlicuecal:


pts-m-d:

thetrippytrip:


dont you just love capitalism..  

Black Mirror predicted this we are all goona die

my god but I get mad when someone flippantly dismisses important scientific progress because you can make it sound dumb by framing it the right way.
For a start, of course a lot of science sounds dumb.  Science is all in the slogging through the minutiae, the failures, the tedious process of filling in the blank spaces on the map because it ain’t ’t glamorous, but if someone doesn’t do it, no one gets to know for sure what’s there.
Someone’s gotta spend their career measuring fly genitalia under a microscope. Frankly, I’m grateful to the person who is tackling that tedium, because if they didn’t, I might have to, and I don’t wanna.
But let’s talk about why we should care about this particular science and spend money on it.  (And I’ll even answer without even glancing at the article.)
Off the top of my head?
-advances in robotics
-advances in miniature robotics
-advances in flight technology
-advantages in simulating and understanding the mechanics and programming of small intelligences
-ability to grow crops in places uninhabitable by insects (space? cold/hot? places where honeybees are non-native and detrimental to the ecosystem?)
-ability to improve productivity density of crops and feed more people
-less strain on bees, who do poorly when forced to pollinate monocultures of low nutrition plants
-ability to run tightly controlled experiments on pollination, on the effects of bees on plant physiology, on ecosystem dynamics, etc
-fucking robot bees, my friend
-hahaha think how confused those flowers must be
Also worth keeping in mind? People love, love, love framing science in condescending and silly sounding terms as an excuse to cut funding to vital programs.  *Especially* if it’s also associated with something (gasp) ‘inappropriate’, like sex or ladyparts.  This is why research for a lot of women’s issues, lgbtq+ issues, minorities’ issues, and vulnerable groups in general’s issues tends to lag so far behind the times.  This is why some groups are pushing so hard to cut funding for climate change research these days.


Anything that’s acquired governmental funding has been through an intensely competitive, months-to-years long screening by EXPERTS IN THE FIELD who have a very good idea what research is likely to be most beneficial to that field and fill a needed gap.
Trust me.  The paperwork haunts my nightmares.
So, we had a joke in my lab: “Nice work, college boy.” It was the phrase for any project that you could spend years and years working on and end up with results that could be summed up on a single, pretty slide with an apparently obvious graph.  The phrase was taken from something a grower said at a talk my advisor gave as a graduate student: “So you proved that plants grow better when they’re watered? Nice work, college boy.”
But like, the thing is?  There’s always more details than that.  And a lot of times it’s important that somebody questions our assumptions. 
A labmate of mine doing very similar research demonstrated that our assumptions about the effect of water stress on plant fitness have been wrong for years because *nobody had thought to separate out the different WAYS a plant can be water stressed.* (Continuously, in bursts, etc.). And it turns out these ways have *drastically different effects* with drastically different measures required for response to them to keep from losing lots of money and resources in agriculture.
Nice work, college boy. :p


Point the second: surprise! Anna Haldewang is an industrial design student.  She developed this in her product design class.  And, as far as I can tell, she has had no particular funding at all for this project, much less billions of dollars. 
‘grats, Anna, you FUCKING ROCK.


ps: On a lighter note, summarizing research to make it sound stupid is both easy AND fun. Check out @lolmythesis – I HIGHLY RECOMMEND. :33




Okay, so I actually know Anna. She is my classmate and my friend, and I know this project quite well. And I could not have put the above statement any better. 
Here’s the thing guys, bumblebees are endangered, but they have a very important roll in our ecosystem. While we are doing everything we can to stabalize the bee populations, we also have to make sure that an important job is being done in our ecosystem. This drone was a conceptual way to aid that as we work to stabalize bee populations. 
I have never been so mad at Tumblr before. This is a huge accomplishment for a student, let alone a female in our male dominated industry. Stop shitting on everything, it doesn’t make you cool. Oh and actually read into things before you go tearing them apart.

chuppa-thingy: curlicuecal: pts-m-d: thetrippytrip: dont you just love capitalism..   Black Mirror predicted this we are all goona...

Conceptual: It is illegal to smonk on these premises leg <p><a href="http://asylunatic.tumblr.com/post/166261599291/someone-asked-me-what-i-thought-about-surreal" class="tumblr_blog">asylunatic</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p>Someone asked me what I thought about surreal memes and I really liked the question so I basically wrote a whole essay to answer that question. It seemed relevant to this blog so I thought I might share it here, too:</p> <p><i>Once upon a time I went to see an art show by Jordan Wolfson. Besides some insanity dancing sculptures, there was a video. It consisted of scenes with a poorly cgi’d condom that was leaking hearts whilst dancing through some rando’s childhood home (or so I interpreted that house). Other scenes included the artist dressed as a punk walking around some 2017 metropole city, like a total anachronism. The whole ordeal was accompanied by Beyonce music and displayed in a room covered in fake fur (ceiling included).</i></p> <p><i>It stuck with me because I interpreted it as a post-modern-post-internet kinda art piece, that just was full of the empty imagery that is encountered now everywhere all the time. Meme culture is just a part of that. </i></p> <p><i>There’s so many images splashed over you that all of them have lost a certain core impact. Repeated exposure numbs. And it is so available over the internet. So many pictures of someones darling dearest baby. So much hardcore anal porn. So many photographs by talented photographers. So much joy and darkness and beauty so readily available. </i></p> <p><i>And that video made me think about all of this. Because what did that outdated house mean to me? Or the condom dancing with hearts? I did not bother about someone else’s house or the anachronist punk. But I was aching because surely it must be meaningful to <b>someone</b>.</i></p> <p><i>When I came home from the show I spoke to my mom. She had seen it too and it turned out that she was way more informed about it. She told me it was actually a piece about something with aids and some social motivation ladidadida. Totally not what I had experienced it to be.</i></p> <p><i>And so my point is, I guess, that memes can do this too. They create their own world where they get used again and again and again and the repetition makes them something new, with no ties to original content and intent. Images that create their own worlds and meanings and repetitions. (in conceptual art these are called simulacra)</i></p> <p><i>I didn’t know surreal memes by name until you asked me, so I googled them guess what. I love them. They are so very much meme to the core: just imagery with no origin, just a canvas for my interpretation. </i></p> </blockquote>
Conceptual: It is illegal
 to smonk on
 these premises
 leg
<p><a href="http://asylunatic.tumblr.com/post/166261599291/someone-asked-me-what-i-thought-about-surreal" class="tumblr_blog">asylunatic</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Someone asked me what I thought about surreal memes and I really liked the question so I basically wrote a whole essay to answer that question. It seemed relevant to this blog so I thought I might share it here, too:</p>
<p><i>Once upon a time I went to see an art show by Jordan Wolfson. Besides some insanity dancing sculptures, there was a video. It consisted of scenes with a poorly cgi’d condom that was leaking hearts whilst dancing through some rando’s childhood home (or so I interpreted that house). Other scenes included the artist dressed as a punk walking around some 2017 metropole city, like a total anachronism. The whole ordeal was accompanied by Beyonce music and displayed in a room covered in fake fur (ceiling included).</i></p>
<p><i>It stuck with me because I interpreted it as a post-modern-post-internet kinda art piece, that just was full of the empty imagery that is encountered now everywhere all the time. Meme culture is just a part of that. </i></p>
<p><i>There’s so many images splashed over you that all of them have lost a certain core impact. Repeated exposure numbs. And it is so available over the internet. So many pictures of someones darling dearest baby. So much hardcore anal porn. So many photographs by talented photographers. So much joy and darkness and beauty so readily available. </i></p>
<p><i>And that video made me think about all of this. Because what did that outdated house mean to me? Or the condom dancing with hearts? I did not bother about someone else’s house or the anachronist punk. But I was aching because surely it must be meaningful to <b>someone</b>.</i></p>
<p><i>When I came home from the show I spoke to my mom. She had seen it too and it turned out that she was way more informed about it. She told me it was actually a piece about something with aids and some social motivation ladidadida. Totally not what I had experienced it to be.</i></p>
<p><i>And so my point is, I guess, that memes can do this too. They create their own world where they get used again and again and again and the repetition makes them something new, with no ties to original content and intent. Images that create their own worlds and meanings and repetitions. (in conceptual art these are called simulacra)</i></p>
<p><i>I didn’t know surreal memes by name until you asked me, so I googled them guess what. I love them. They are so very much meme to the core: just imagery with no origin, just a canvas for my interpretation. </i></p>
</blockquote>

<p><a href="http://asylunatic.tumblr.com/post/166261599291/someone-asked-me-what-i-thought-about-surreal" class="tumblr_blog">asylunatic<...

Conceptual: [-1-11 points 5 hours ageo We have the 5th largest military in the world. We are undefeated in the Falklands, WW1 and WW2. Those chaps in Brussells should bare that in mind before they start running their mouths. perma-link source embed save save-RES report give gold reply hide child comments 4 points hours ago Brussells Showing results for Brussels perma-link source embed save save-RES parent report give gold reply hide child comments [-21-4 points 4 hours ago Wow, you're almost as much of a Nazi as Jean-claude Juncker perma-link source embed save save-RES parent report give gold reply 个[-]· [+1] 5 points 3 hours ago There's delusional and then there's this. perma-link source embed save save-RES parent report give gold reply t-1+1] 3 points 2 hours ago Yes. Britain attacks a NATO state. That will go well. The US is obligated to respond, and they have air bases 10min flying time from London. perma-link source embed save save-RES parent report give gold reply hide child comments 4-3-4points 1 hour ago You never heard of the special relationship? perma-link source embed save save-RES parent report give gold reply hide child comments -+2] 3 points 1 hour ago It's a malleable conceptual thing. The NATO treaty has the force of law. There is no way out of it unless the US is willing to scrap NATO. For a tiny rock they absolutely will not, as it would undermine all US defence pacts around the world There is no military option with Gib that allows Britain the moral high ground. It will be condemned by the EU, UN NATO and every other organisation. It would be insane. Then again insane seems to be back in style perma-link source embed save save-RES parent report give gold reply hide child comments 个[-:- .- 噩Expat-chin] [score hidden] 43 minutes ago We'll fucking have the lot of em! Don't forget we invented Pugilism and winning wars! perma-link source embed save save-RES parent report give gold reply 1 point 5 hours ago Snap question! Which country still has the capability to operate fixed winged aircraft off of aircraft carriers? Spain or the UK? perma-link source embed save save-RES parent report give gold reply hide child comments 1 point 2 hours ago <p><a href="http://memehumor.net/post/159198127788/a-real-human-being-thinks-that-not-only-would-it" class="tumblr_blog">memehumor</a>:</p> <blockquote><p>A real human being thinks that not only would it be possible for the UK to wage a war vs a NATO ally but that it is actually a viable option.</p></blockquote>
Conceptual: [-1-11 points 5 hours ageo
 We have the 5th largest military in the world. We are undefeated in the Falklands, WW1 and WW2. Those chaps in
 Brussells should bare that in mind before they start running their mouths.
 perma-link source embed save save-RES report give gold reply hide child comments
 4 points
 hours ago
 Brussells
 Showing results for Brussels
 perma-link source embed save save-RES parent report give gold reply hide child comments
 [-21-4 points 4 hours ago
 Wow, you're almost as much of a Nazi as Jean-claude Juncker
 perma-link source embed save save-RES parent report give gold reply
 个[-]·
 [+1] 5 points 3 hours ago
 There's delusional and then there's this.
 perma-link source embed save save-RES parent report give gold reply
 t-1+1] 3 points 2 hours ago
 Yes. Britain attacks a NATO state. That will go well. The US is obligated to respond, and they have air bases 10min
 flying time from London.
 perma-link source embed save save-RES parent report give gold reply hide child comments
 4-3-4points 1 hour ago
 You never heard of the special relationship?
 perma-link source embed save save-RES parent report give gold reply hide child comments
 -+2] 3 points 1 hour ago
 It's a malleable conceptual thing. The NATO treaty has the force of law. There is no way out of it unless the US is
 willing to scrap NATO. For a tiny rock they absolutely will not, as it would undermine all US defence pacts around the
 world
 There is no military option with Gib that allows Britain the moral high ground. It will be condemned by the EU, UN
 NATO and every other organisation. It would be insane. Then again insane seems to be back in style
 perma-link source embed save save-RES parent report give gold reply hide child comments
 个[-:- .- 噩Expat-chin] [score hidden] 43 minutes ago
 We'll fucking have the lot of em! Don't forget we invented Pugilism and winning wars!
 perma-link source embed save save-RES parent report give gold reply
 1 point 5 hours ago
 Snap question! Which country still has the capability to operate fixed winged aircraft off of aircraft carriers? Spain or
 the UK?
 perma-link source embed save save-RES parent report give gold reply hide child comments
 1 point 2 hours ago
<p><a href="http://memehumor.net/post/159198127788/a-real-human-being-thinks-that-not-only-would-it" class="tumblr_blog">memehumor</a>:</p>

<blockquote><p>A real human being thinks that not only would it be possible for the UK to wage a war vs a NATO ally but that it is actually a viable option.</p></blockquote>

<p><a href="http://memehumor.net/post/159198127788/a-real-human-being-thinks-that-not-only-would-it" class="tumblr_blog">memehumor</a>:</...

Conceptual: tumblr YEAR IN REVIEW 2016 <p><a href="https://thefandometrics.tumblr.com/post/154076155199/you-did-it-you-went-the-long-way-around-the-sun" class="tumblr_blog">thefandometrics</a>:</p> <blockquote><p>You did it. You went the long way around the sun and now you’re back for another Tumblr Year in Review. This year: 2016.</p><h2>What is Tumblr’s Year In Review?</h2><p>Why it’s all the top stuff on Tumblr. From all over Tumblr. Stacked and sorted by our very own Fandometrics, the pleasingly scientific system we use to rank your enthusiasm and love. Scan the categories below for the things you’re most enthusiastic about.</p><p>The best of 2016, right this way please 👉</p><hr><p><br/></p><p><b><a href="https://thefandometrics.tumblr.com/post/154014920694/tv-live-action">TV: Live Action</a></b><br/>The stranger things in life: Zombies, teen wolves, big brothers, and Steven Moffat.</p><p><b><a href="https://thefandometrics.tumblr.com/post/153999149169/tv-animated">TV: Animated</a> </b><br/>Gems, ladybugs, and transformers start our top 20 list.<br/></p><p><b><a href="https://thefandometrics.tumblr.com/post/153999093029/movies">Movies</a> </b><br/>Superheroes and strong women. Not mutually exclusive.</p><p><b><a href="https://thefandometrics.tumblr.com/post/153999062674/music-solo-artists">Solo artists</a> </b><br/>60% of your favorite musicians were women this year. Some of the others came from the Australian internet.<br/></p><p><b><a href="https://thefandometrics.tumblr.com/post/153998997409/music-bands">Bands</a><br/></b>In this year: Numbered groups. Out this year: The Beatles.</p><p><b><a href="https://thefandometrics.tumblr.com/post/153998938514/albums">Albums</a></b> <br/>The oldest album on this list is from 2010. It’s old enough to go to Kindergarten.<br/></p><p><b><a href="https://thefandometrics.tumblr.com/post/153998790454/kpop">K-Pop</a></b><br/>Once you K-pop the fun don’t K-stop.<br/></p><p><b><a href="https://thefandometrics.tumblr.com/post/153998774509/actresses">Actresses</a></b><br/>A commander and scavenger walked into this list.<br/></p><p><b><a href="https://thefandometrics.tumblr.com/post/153998751204/actors">Actors</a> </b><br/>Sebastian Stan is our boyfriend now. Sorry, Chris-es.</p><p><b><a href="https://thefandometrics.tumblr.com/post/153998733174/models">Models</a> </b><br/>The first time we’ve seen two male models grace this list.</p><p><b><a href="https://thefandometrics.tumblr.com/post/153998589674/athletes">Athletes</a> </b><br/>With seven past and present members of the USWNT, we almost have a whole soccer team.<br/></p><p><b><a href="https://thefandometrics.tumblr.com/post/153998565089/reality-stars">Reality stars</a></b><br/>The Kardashians continue to be your favorite family, but this list is 40% drag queens.</p><p><b><a href="https://thefandometrics.tumblr.com/post/153999782674/video-games">Video games</a> </b><br/>An indie game can beat out every major release this year. Take that, Big Game.</p><p><b><a href="https://thefandometrics.tumblr.com/post/153998519024/web-stuff">Web stuff</a></b><br/>Assorted stuff from the internet.</p><p><b><a href="https://thefandometrics.tumblr.com/post/153998413834/social-issues">Social issues</a> </b><br/>In a year of countless important conversations, these were the issues Tumblr talked about the most.<br/></p><p><b><a href="https://thefandometrics.tumblr.com/post/153998330134/books">Books</a> </b><br/>How many lists can Dan and Phil appear on? Here’s another.</p><p><b><a href="https://thefandometrics.tumblr.com/post/153998302434/anime-and-manga">Anime and Manga</a></b><br/>We made a dubbed version of this list, but it was way worse than the original.</p><p><b><a href="https://thefandometrics.tumblr.com/post/153998280734/ships">Ships</a></b><br/>Set sail on the S.S. Conceptual Relationship.<br/></p><p><b><a href="https://thefandometrics.tumblr.com/post/153998258509/memes">Memes</a> </b><br/>So much more than just a picture with bottom text.</p><p><b><a href="https://thefandometrics.tumblr.com/post/153998225899/tumblr-communities">Tumblr communities</a></b><br/>Not every -blr on Tumblr, but the 20 that did the the most talking this year. From Artblr to the Simblr, Petblr to Applying-for-college-blr, welcome home.<br/></p><p><b><a href="https://thefandometrics.tumblr.com/post/153998198434/art">Art</a> </b><br/>You’ll know it when you see it.<br/></p><p><b><a href="https://thefandometrics.tumblr.com/post/153998175344/food">Food</a> </b><br/>Serving size: 1 list. Contains natural flavors. A good source of riboflavin. 100%DV fun.</p><p><b><a href="https://thefandometrics.tumblr.com/post/153998142489/animals">Animals</a> </b><br/>You can domesticate about half of this list. Two of them may even be real!</p><p><a href="https://thefandometrics.tumblr.com/post/153998072644/tumblr-gets-deep"><b>Tumblr Gets Deep</b><br/></a>When reblogs get witty, wise, or just straight-up WTF.</p></blockquote> <p>A Tumblr year in review sounds like a really really bad time.</p>
Conceptual: tumblr
 YEAR IN
 REVIEW
 2016
<p><a href="https://thefandometrics.tumblr.com/post/154076155199/you-did-it-you-went-the-long-way-around-the-sun" class="tumblr_blog">thefandometrics</a>:</p>

<blockquote><p>You did it. You went the long way around the sun and now you’re back for another Tumblr Year in Review. This year: 2016.</p><h2>What is Tumblr’s Year In Review?</h2><p>Why it’s all the top stuff on Tumblr. From all over Tumblr. Stacked and sorted by our very own Fandometrics, the pleasingly scientific system we use to rank your enthusiasm and love. Scan the categories below for the things you’re most enthusiastic about.</p><p>The best of 2016, right this way please 👉</p><hr><p><br/></p><p><b><a href="https://thefandometrics.tumblr.com/post/154014920694/tv-live-action">TV: Live Action</a></b><br/>The stranger things in life: Zombies, teen wolves, big brothers, and Steven Moffat.</p><p><b><a href="https://thefandometrics.tumblr.com/post/153999149169/tv-animated">TV: Animated</a> </b><br/>Gems, ladybugs, and transformers start our top 20 list.<br/></p><p><b><a href="https://thefandometrics.tumblr.com/post/153999093029/movies">Movies</a> </b><br/>Superheroes and strong women. Not mutually exclusive.</p><p><b><a href="https://thefandometrics.tumblr.com/post/153999062674/music-solo-artists">Solo artists</a> </b><br/>60% of your favorite musicians were women this year. Some of the others came from the Australian internet.<br/></p><p><b><a href="https://thefandometrics.tumblr.com/post/153998997409/music-bands">Bands</a><br/></b>In this year: Numbered groups. Out this year: The Beatles.</p><p><b><a href="https://thefandometrics.tumblr.com/post/153998938514/albums">Albums</a></b> <br/>The oldest album on this list is from 2010. It’s old enough to go to Kindergarten.<br/></p><p><b><a href="https://thefandometrics.tumblr.com/post/153998790454/kpop">K-Pop</a></b><br/>Once you K-pop the fun don’t K-stop.<br/></p><p><b><a href="https://thefandometrics.tumblr.com/post/153998774509/actresses">Actresses</a></b><br/>A commander and scavenger walked into this list.<br/></p><p><b><a href="https://thefandometrics.tumblr.com/post/153998751204/actors">Actors</a> </b><br/>Sebastian Stan is our boyfriend now. Sorry, Chris-es.</p><p><b><a href="https://thefandometrics.tumblr.com/post/153998733174/models">Models</a> </b><br/>The first time we’ve seen two male models grace this list.</p><p><b><a href="https://thefandometrics.tumblr.com/post/153998589674/athletes">Athletes</a> </b><br/>With seven past and present members of the USWNT, we almost have a whole soccer team.<br/></p><p><b><a href="https://thefandometrics.tumblr.com/post/153998565089/reality-stars">Reality stars</a></b><br/>The Kardashians continue to be your favorite family, but this list is 40% drag queens.</p><p><b><a href="https://thefandometrics.tumblr.com/post/153999782674/video-games">Video games</a> </b><br/>An indie game can beat out every major release this year. Take that, Big Game.</p><p><b><a href="https://thefandometrics.tumblr.com/post/153998519024/web-stuff">Web stuff</a></b><br/>Assorted stuff from the internet.</p><p><b><a href="https://thefandometrics.tumblr.com/post/153998413834/social-issues">Social issues</a> </b><br/>In a year of countless important conversations, these were the issues Tumblr talked about the most.<br/></p><p><b><a href="https://thefandometrics.tumblr.com/post/153998330134/books">Books</a> </b><br/>How many lists can Dan and Phil appear on? Here’s another.</p><p><b><a href="https://thefandometrics.tumblr.com/post/153998302434/anime-and-manga">Anime and Manga</a></b><br/>We made a dubbed version of this list, but it was way worse than the original.</p><p><b><a href="https://thefandometrics.tumblr.com/post/153998280734/ships">Ships</a></b><br/>Set sail on the S.S. Conceptual Relationship.<br/></p><p><b><a href="https://thefandometrics.tumblr.com/post/153998258509/memes">Memes</a> </b><br/>So much more than just a picture with bottom text.</p><p><b><a href="https://thefandometrics.tumblr.com/post/153998225899/tumblr-communities">Tumblr communities</a></b><br/>Not every -blr on Tumblr, but the 20 that did the the most talking this year. From Artblr to the Simblr, Petblr to Applying-for-college-blr, welcome home.<br/></p><p><b><a href="https://thefandometrics.tumblr.com/post/153998198434/art">Art</a> </b><br/>You’ll know it when you see it.<br/></p><p><b><a href="https://thefandometrics.tumblr.com/post/153998175344/food">Food</a> </b><br/>Serving size: 1 list. Contains natural flavors. A good source of riboflavin. 100%DV fun.</p><p><b><a href="https://thefandometrics.tumblr.com/post/153998142489/animals">Animals</a> </b><br/>You can domesticate about half of this list. Two of them may even be real!</p><p><a href="https://thefandometrics.tumblr.com/post/153998072644/tumblr-gets-deep"><b>Tumblr Gets Deep</b><br/></a>When reblogs get witty, wise, or just straight-up WTF.</p></blockquote>

<p>A Tumblr year in review sounds like a really really bad time.</p>

<p><a href="https://thefandometrics.tumblr.com/post/154076155199/you-did-it-you-went-the-long-way-around-the-sun" class="tumblr_blog">the...

Conceptual: tumblr YEAR IN REVIEW 2016 <p>You did it. You went the long way around the sun and now you&rsquo;re back for another Tumblr Year in Review. This year: 2016.</p><h2>What is Tumblr&rsquo;s Year In Review?</h2><p>Why it&rsquo;s all the top stuff on Tumblr. From all over Tumblr. Stacked and sorted by our very own Fandometrics, the pleasingly scientific system we use to rank your enthusiasm and love. Scan the categories below for the things you&rsquo;re most enthusiastic about.</p><p>The best of 2016, right this way please 👉</p><hr><p><br/></p><p><b><a href="https://thefandometrics.tumblr.com/post/154014920694/tv-live-action">TV: Live Action</a></b><br/>The stranger things in life: Zombies, teen wolves, big brothers, and Steven Moffat.</p><p><b><a href="https://thefandometrics.tumblr.com/post/153999149169/tv-animated">TV: Animated</a> </b><br/>Gems, ladybugs, and transformers start our top 20 list.<br/></p><p><b><a href="https://thefandometrics.tumblr.com/post/153999093029/movies">Movies</a> </b><br/>Superheroes and strong women. Not mutually exclusive.</p><p><b><a href="https://thefandometrics.tumblr.com/post/153999062674/music-solo-artists">Solo artists</a> </b><br/>60% of your favorite musicians were women this year. Some of the others came from the Australian internet.<br/></p><p><b><a href="https://thefandometrics.tumblr.com/post/153998997409/music-bands">Bands</a><br/></b>In this year: Numbered groups. Out this year: The Beatles.</p><p><b><a href="https://thefandometrics.tumblr.com/post/153998938514/albums">Albums</a></b> <br/>The oldest album on this list is from 2010. It’s old enough to go to Kindergarten.<br/></p><p><b><a href="https://thefandometrics.tumblr.com/post/153998790454/kpop">K-Pop</a></b><br/>Once you K-pop the fun don’t K-stop.<br/></p><p><b><a href="https://thefandometrics.tumblr.com/post/153998774509/actresses">Actresses</a></b><br/>A commander and scavenger walked into this list.<br/></p><p><b><a href="https://thefandometrics.tumblr.com/post/153998751204/actors">Actors</a> </b><br/>Sebastian Stan is our boyfriend now. Sorry, Chris-es.</p><p><b><a href="https://thefandometrics.tumblr.com/post/153998733174/models">Models</a> </b><br/>The first time we’ve seen two male models grace this list.</p><p><b><a href="https://thefandometrics.tumblr.com/post/153998589674/athletes">Athletes</a> </b><br/>With seven past and present members of the USWNT, we almost have a whole soccer team.<br/></p><p><b><a href="https://thefandometrics.tumblr.com/post/153998565089/reality-stars">Reality stars</a></b><br/>The Kardashians continue to be your favorite family, but this list is 40% drag queens.</p><p><b><a href="https://thefandometrics.tumblr.com/post/153999782674/video-games">Video games</a> </b><br/>An indie game can beat out every major release this year. Take that, Big Game.</p><p><b><a href="https://thefandometrics.tumblr.com/post/153998519024/web-stuff">Web stuff</a></b><br/>Assorted stuff from the internet.</p><p><b><a href="https://thefandometrics.tumblr.com/post/153998413834/social-issues">Social issues</a> </b><br/>In a year of countless important conversations, these were the issues Tumblr talked about the most.<br/></p><p><b><a href="https://thefandometrics.tumblr.com/post/153998330134/books">Books</a> </b><br/>How many lists can Dan and Phil appear on? Here’s another.</p><p><b><a href="https://thefandometrics.tumblr.com/post/153998302434/anime-and-manga">Anime and Manga</a></b><br/>We made a dubbed version of this list, but it was way worse than the original.</p><p><b><a href="https://thefandometrics.tumblr.com/post/153998280734/ships">Ships</a></b><br/>Set sail on the S.S. Conceptual Relationship.<br/></p><p><b><a href="https://thefandometrics.tumblr.com/post/153998258509/memes">Memes</a> </b><br/>So much more than just a picture with bottom text.</p><p><b><a href="https://thefandometrics.tumblr.com/post/153998225899/tumblr-communities">Tumblr communities</a></b><br/>Not every -blr on Tumblr, but the 20 that did the the most talking this year. From Artblr to the Simblr, Petblr to Applying-for-college-blr, welcome home.<br/></p><p><b><a href="https://thefandometrics.tumblr.com/post/153998198434/art">Art</a> </b><br/>You&rsquo;ll know it when you see it.<br/></p><p><b><a href="https://thefandometrics.tumblr.com/post/153998175344/food">Food</a> </b><br/>Serving size: 1 list. Contains natural flavors. A good source of riboflavin. 100%DV fun.</p><p><b><a href="https://thefandometrics.tumblr.com/post/153998142489/animals">Animals</a> </b><br/>You can domesticate about half of this list. Two of them may even be real!</p><p><a href="https://thefandometrics.tumblr.com/post/153998072644/tumblr-gets-deep"><b>Tumblr Gets Deep</b><br/></a>When reblogs get witty, wise, or just straight-up WTF.</p>
Conceptual: tumblr
 YEAR IN
 REVIEW
 2016
<p>You did it. You went the long way around the sun and now you&rsquo;re back for another Tumblr Year in Review. This year: 2016.</p><h2>What is Tumblr&rsquo;s Year In Review?</h2><p>Why it&rsquo;s all the top stuff on Tumblr. From all over Tumblr. Stacked and sorted by our very own Fandometrics, the pleasingly scientific system we use to rank your enthusiasm and love. Scan the categories below for the things you&rsquo;re most enthusiastic about.</p><p>The best of 2016, right this way please 👉</p><hr><p><br/></p><p><b><a href="https://thefandometrics.tumblr.com/post/154014920694/tv-live-action">TV: Live Action</a></b><br/>The stranger things in life: Zombies, teen wolves, big brothers, and Steven Moffat.</p><p><b><a href="https://thefandometrics.tumblr.com/post/153999149169/tv-animated">TV: Animated</a> </b><br/>Gems, ladybugs, and transformers start our top 20 list.<br/></p><p><b><a href="https://thefandometrics.tumblr.com/post/153999093029/movies">Movies</a> </b><br/>Superheroes and strong women. Not mutually exclusive.</p><p><b><a href="https://thefandometrics.tumblr.com/post/153999062674/music-solo-artists">Solo artists</a> </b><br/>60% of your favorite musicians were women this year. Some of the others came from the Australian internet.<br/></p><p><b><a href="https://thefandometrics.tumblr.com/post/153998997409/music-bands">Bands</a><br/></b>In this year: Numbered groups. Out this year: The Beatles.</p><p><b><a href="https://thefandometrics.tumblr.com/post/153998938514/albums">Albums</a></b> <br/>The oldest album on this list is from 2010. It’s old enough to go to Kindergarten.<br/></p><p><b><a href="https://thefandometrics.tumblr.com/post/153998790454/kpop">K-Pop</a></b><br/>Once you K-pop the fun don’t K-stop.<br/></p><p><b><a href="https://thefandometrics.tumblr.com/post/153998774509/actresses">Actresses</a></b><br/>A commander and scavenger walked into this list.<br/></p><p><b><a href="https://thefandometrics.tumblr.com/post/153998751204/actors">Actors</a> </b><br/>Sebastian Stan is our boyfriend now. Sorry, Chris-es.</p><p><b><a href="https://thefandometrics.tumblr.com/post/153998733174/models">Models</a> </b><br/>The first time we’ve seen two male models grace this list.</p><p><b><a href="https://thefandometrics.tumblr.com/post/153998589674/athletes">Athletes</a> </b><br/>With seven past and present members of the USWNT, we almost have a whole soccer team.<br/></p><p><b><a href="https://thefandometrics.tumblr.com/post/153998565089/reality-stars">Reality stars</a></b><br/>The Kardashians continue to be your favorite family, but this list is 40% drag queens.</p><p><b><a href="https://thefandometrics.tumblr.com/post/153999782674/video-games">Video games</a> </b><br/>An indie game can beat out every major release this year. Take that, Big Game.</p><p><b><a href="https://thefandometrics.tumblr.com/post/153998519024/web-stuff">Web stuff</a></b><br/>Assorted stuff from the internet.</p><p><b><a href="https://thefandometrics.tumblr.com/post/153998413834/social-issues">Social issues</a> </b><br/>In a year of countless important conversations, these were the issues Tumblr talked about the most.<br/></p><p><b><a href="https://thefandometrics.tumblr.com/post/153998330134/books">Books</a> </b><br/>How many lists can Dan and Phil appear on? Here’s another.</p><p><b><a href="https://thefandometrics.tumblr.com/post/153998302434/anime-and-manga">Anime and Manga</a></b><br/>We made a dubbed version of this list, but it was way worse than the original.</p><p><b><a href="https://thefandometrics.tumblr.com/post/153998280734/ships">Ships</a></b><br/>Set sail on the S.S. Conceptual Relationship.<br/></p><p><b><a href="https://thefandometrics.tumblr.com/post/153998258509/memes">Memes</a> </b><br/>So much more than just a picture with bottom text.</p><p><b><a href="https://thefandometrics.tumblr.com/post/153998225899/tumblr-communities">Tumblr communities</a></b><br/>Not every -blr on Tumblr, but the 20 that did the the most talking this year. From Artblr to the Simblr, Petblr to Applying-for-college-blr, welcome home.<br/></p><p><b><a href="https://thefandometrics.tumblr.com/post/153998198434/art">Art</a> </b><br/>You&rsquo;ll know it when you see it.<br/></p><p><b><a href="https://thefandometrics.tumblr.com/post/153998175344/food">Food</a> </b><br/>Serving size: 1 list. Contains natural flavors. A good source of riboflavin. 100%DV fun.</p><p><b><a href="https://thefandometrics.tumblr.com/post/153998142489/animals">Animals</a> </b><br/>You can domesticate about half of this list. Two of them may even be real!</p><p><a href="https://thefandometrics.tumblr.com/post/153998072644/tumblr-gets-deep"><b>Tumblr Gets Deep</b><br/></a>When reblogs get witty, wise, or just straight-up WTF.</p>

<p>You did it. You went the long way around the sun and now you&rsquo;re back for another Tumblr Year in Review. This year: 2016.</p><h2>...

Conceptual: SHIPS <h2>2016&rsquo;s Top Ships</h2><p><i>Set sail on the S.S. Conceptual Relationship.</i></p><p>1. <a href="http://www.tumblr.com/search/clexa">Clexa</a><i> +7<br/>    </i>Clarke Griffin &amp; Commander Lexa, <i>The 100</i></p><figure data-orig-width="500" data-orig-height="245" data-tumblr-attribution="clarke-kom-forlexa:HVB3MBrX1KCSxuSgWntV3Q:ZMmDXr22sRXbn" class="tmblr-full"><img src="https://78.media.tumblr.com/5003db9d5a7f492f486db5ca167f31ee/tumblr_o3kfhtRy1A1sxf3mno1_500.gif" alt="image" data-orig-width="500" data-orig-height="245"/></figure><p>2. <a href="http://www.tumblr.com/search/dan%20and%20phil">Dan and Phil</a> <br/>    Dan Howell &amp; Phil Lester, <i>YouTubers<br/></i>3. <a href="http://www.tumblr.com/search/larry%20stylinson">Larry Stylinson</a><i> −2<br/>    </i>Harry Styles &amp; Louis Tomlinson, <i>One Direction<br/></i>4. <a href="http://www.tumblr.com/search/destiel">Destiel</a><i> −1<br/>    </i>Dean Winchester &amp; Castiel, <i>Supernatural<br/></i>5. <b><a href="http://www.tumblr.com/search/malec">Malec</a><br/></b>    Magnus Bane &amp; Alec Lightwood, <i>Shadowhunters</i></p><figure data-orig-width="500" data-orig-height="269" data-tumblr-attribution="newtporn:EUR7irVnOV8e3KVCgyHgAg:ZDtz4l25WFNbd" class="tmblr-full"><img src="https://78.media.tumblr.com/d8ed5826642405e66239227d53217dba/tumblr_o65xreOdaT1uq4r3mo1_500.gif" alt="image" data-orig-width="500" data-orig-height="269"/></figure><p>6. <b><a href="http://www.tumblr.com/search/klance">Klance</a></b> <br/>    Keith &amp; Lance, <i>Voltron: Legendary Defender<br/></i>7. <b><a href="http://www.tumblr.com/search/wigetta">Wigetta</a><br/></b>    Willyrex &amp; Vegetta777, <i>YouTubers<br/></i>8. <a href="http://www.tumblr.com/search/stucky">Stucky</a><i> +1<br/>    </i>Steve Rogers &amp; Bucky Barnes, <i>Captain America: Civil war<br/></i>9. <b><a href="http://www.tumblr.com/search/kylux">Kylux</a><br/></b>    Kylo Ren &amp; General Hux, <i>Star Wars: The Force Awakens<br/></i>10. <b><a href="http://www.tumblr.com/search/reylo">Reylo</a><br/></b>    Rey &amp; Kylo Ren, <i>Star Wars: The Force Awakens<br/></i>11. <b><a href="http://www.tumblr.com/search/camren">Camren</a><br/></b>    Camila Cabello and Lauren Jauregui, <i>Fifth Harmony<br/></i>12. <a href="http://www.tumblr.com/search/captain%20swan">Captain Swan</a><i> −7<br/>    </i>Captain Hook &amp; Emma Swan, <i>Once Upon a Time<br/></i>13. <b><a href="http://www.tumblr.com/search/ladynoir">Ladynoir</a><br/></b>    Ladybug &amp; Cat Noir, <i>Miraculous: Tales of Ladybug &amp; Cat Noir<br/></i>14. <a href="http://www.tumblr.com/search/sasusaku">SasuSaku</a><i> −7<br/>    </i>Sasuke Uchiha &amp; Sakura Haruno, <i>Naruto<br/></i>15. <b><a href="http://www.tumblr.com/search/stydia">Stydia</a><br/></b>    Stiles Stilinski &amp; Lydia Martin, <i>Teen Wolf<br/></i>16. <a href="http://www.tumblr.com/search/bellarke">Bellarke</a><i> −5<br/>    </i>Bellamy Blake &amp; Clarke Griffin, <i>The 100<br/></i>17. <b><a href="http://www.tumblr.com/search/mchanzo">McHanzo</a><br/></b>    Jesse McCree &amp; Hanzo Shimada, <i>Overwatch<br/></i>18. <b><a href="http://www.tumblr.com/search/nalu">NaLu</a><br/></b>    Natsu Dragneel &amp; Lucy Heartfilia, <i>Fairy Tail<br/></i>19. <a href="http://www.tumblr.com/search/olicity">Olicity</a><i> −15<br/>    </i>Oliver Queen &amp; Felicity Smoak, <i>Arrow<br/></i>20. <b><a href="http://www.tumblr.com/search/kagehina">Kagehina</a><br/></b>    Kageyama Tobio &amp; Hinata Shouyou, <i>Haikyuu!!</i></p><p><i>The number in italics indicates how many spots an item moved up or down from the previous year. The ones in bold weren’t on the list last year.</i></p>
Conceptual: SHIPS
<h2>2016&rsquo;s Top Ships</h2><p><i>Set sail on the S.S. Conceptual Relationship.</i></p><p>1. <a href="http://www.tumblr.com/search/clexa">Clexa</a><i> +7<br/>    </i>Clarke Griffin &amp; Commander Lexa, <i>The 100</i></p><figure data-orig-width="500" data-orig-height="245" data-tumblr-attribution="clarke-kom-forlexa:HVB3MBrX1KCSxuSgWntV3Q:ZMmDXr22sRXbn" class="tmblr-full"><img src="https://78.media.tumblr.com/5003db9d5a7f492f486db5ca167f31ee/tumblr_o3kfhtRy1A1sxf3mno1_500.gif" alt="image" data-orig-width="500" data-orig-height="245"/></figure><p>2. <a href="http://www.tumblr.com/search/dan%20and%20phil">Dan and Phil</a> <br/>    Dan Howell &amp; Phil Lester, <i>YouTubers<br/></i>3. <a href="http://www.tumblr.com/search/larry%20stylinson">Larry Stylinson</a><i> −2<br/>    </i>Harry Styles &amp; Louis Tomlinson, <i>One Direction<br/></i>4. <a href="http://www.tumblr.com/search/destiel">Destiel</a><i> −1<br/>    </i>Dean Winchester &amp; Castiel, <i>Supernatural<br/></i>5. <b><a href="http://www.tumblr.com/search/malec">Malec</a><br/></b>    Magnus Bane &amp; Alec Lightwood, <i>Shadowhunters</i></p><figure data-orig-width="500" data-orig-height="269" data-tumblr-attribution="newtporn:EUR7irVnOV8e3KVCgyHgAg:ZDtz4l25WFNbd" class="tmblr-full"><img src="https://78.media.tumblr.com/d8ed5826642405e66239227d53217dba/tumblr_o65xreOdaT1uq4r3mo1_500.gif" alt="image" data-orig-width="500" data-orig-height="269"/></figure><p>6. <b><a href="http://www.tumblr.com/search/klance">Klance</a></b> <br/>    Keith &amp; Lance, <i>Voltron: Legendary Defender<br/></i>7. <b><a href="http://www.tumblr.com/search/wigetta">Wigetta</a><br/></b>    Willyrex &amp; Vegetta777, <i>YouTubers<br/></i>8. <a href="http://www.tumblr.com/search/stucky">Stucky</a><i> +1<br/>    </i>Steve Rogers &amp; Bucky Barnes, <i>Captain America: Civil war<br/></i>9. <b><a href="http://www.tumblr.com/search/kylux">Kylux</a><br/></b>    Kylo Ren &amp; General Hux, <i>Star Wars: The Force Awakens<br/></i>10. <b><a href="http://www.tumblr.com/search/reylo">Reylo</a><br/></b>    Rey &amp; Kylo Ren, <i>Star Wars: The Force Awakens<br/></i>11. <b><a href="http://www.tumblr.com/search/camren">Camren</a><br/></b>    Camila Cabello and Lauren Jauregui, <i>Fifth Harmony<br/></i>12. <a href="http://www.tumblr.com/search/captain%20swan">Captain Swan</a><i> −7<br/>    </i>Captain Hook &amp; Emma Swan, <i>Once Upon a Time<br/></i>13. <b><a href="http://www.tumblr.com/search/ladynoir">Ladynoir</a><br/></b>    Ladybug &amp; Cat Noir, <i>Miraculous: Tales of Ladybug &amp; Cat Noir<br/></i>14. <a href="http://www.tumblr.com/search/sasusaku">SasuSaku</a><i> −7<br/>    </i>Sasuke Uchiha &amp; Sakura Haruno, <i>Naruto<br/></i>15. <b><a href="http://www.tumblr.com/search/stydia">Stydia</a><br/></b>    Stiles Stilinski &amp; Lydia Martin, <i>Teen Wolf<br/></i>16. <a href="http://www.tumblr.com/search/bellarke">Bellarke</a><i> −5<br/>    </i>Bellamy Blake &amp; Clarke Griffin, <i>The 100<br/></i>17. <b><a href="http://www.tumblr.com/search/mchanzo">McHanzo</a><br/></b>    Jesse McCree &amp; Hanzo Shimada, <i>Overwatch<br/></i>18. <b><a href="http://www.tumblr.com/search/nalu">NaLu</a><br/></b>    Natsu Dragneel &amp; Lucy Heartfilia, <i>Fairy Tail<br/></i>19. <a href="http://www.tumblr.com/search/olicity">Olicity</a><i> −15<br/>    </i>Oliver Queen &amp; Felicity Smoak, <i>Arrow<br/></i>20. <b><a href="http://www.tumblr.com/search/kagehina">Kagehina</a><br/></b>    Kageyama Tobio &amp; Hinata Shouyou, <i>Haikyuu!!</i></p><p><i>The number in italics indicates how many spots an item moved up or down from the previous year. The ones in bold weren’t on the list last year.</i></p>

<h2>2016&rsquo;s Top Ships</h2><p><i>Set sail on the S.S. Conceptual Relationship.</i></p><p>1. <a href="http://www.tumblr.com/search/cle...