Change


                    
                    
                

                

                

            

        
    







            

            
            

                

                    
                

                

                    

                        


	

	
    
        

            

                
                    
                    
                    
                    

    

        Females
        

            
            Females
        

    

    

         
Females

    



                
                    
                    
                    
                    

    

         squirrels
        

            
             squirrels
        

    

    

         
 squirrels

    



                
                    
                    
                    
                    

    

        ons
        

            
            ons
        

    

    

         
ons

    



                
                    
                    
                    
                    

    

        like this
        

            
            like this
        

    

    

         
like this

    



                
                    
                    
                    
                    

    

        useful
        

            
            useful
        

    

    

         
useful

    



                
                    
                    
                    
                    

    

        lettering
        

            
            lettering
        

    

    

         
lettering

    



                
                    
                    
                    
                    

    

        really
        

            
            really
        

    

    

         
really

    



                
                    
                    
                    
                    

    

        this
        

            
            this
        

    

    

         
this

    



                
                    
                    
                    
                    

    

        using
        

            
            using
        

    

    

         
using

    



                
                    
                    
                    
                    

    

        the dog
        

            
            the dog
        

    

    

         
the dog

    



                
            

        

    
    

        šŸ”„ | Latest
    

    
    

        

        
        

            

                



            

        

        
        

            

                



            

        

        
        

            

                



            

        

        
        

            

                



            

        

        
        

            

                



            

        

        
        

            

                



            

        

        
        

            

                



            

        

        
        

            

                



            

        

        
        

            

                



            

        

        
        

            

                



            

        

        
        

            

                



            

        

        
        

            

                



            

        

        
        

            

                



            

        

        
        

            

                



            

        

        
        

            

                



            

        

        
        

            

                



            

        

        
        

            

                



            

        

        
        

            

                



            

        

        
        

            

                



            

        

        
        

            

                



            

        

        
        

            

                



            

        

        
        

            

                



            

        

        
        

            

                



            

        

        
        

            

                



            

        

        
        

            

                



            

        

        
        

            

                



            

        

        
        

            

                



            

        

        
        

            

                



            

        

        
        

            

                



            

        

        
        

            

                




    Beijing, Definitely, and Guns: BANG
 BANG
 WE CAN END GUN VIOLENCE.
xphilosoraptorx:

unlimited-shitpost-works:
siryouarebeingmocked:


8lastrat8:

americanā€“support:

kasaron:


allriot-political-tshirts:


American citizens own 40% of all guns in the world. 

Out of more than one billion firearms in the world, American citizens hold 393 million, for a population of roughly 326 million. Thatā€™s a lot of guns!

The last time the US federal government managed to pass laws that limit the spread and use of guns was 25 years ago. It was 1994. The Federal Assault Weapons Ban was temporary. It expired in 2004, resulting in a massive increase in mass shootings across the country. Republicans are running out of excuses, blaming the latest incidents in Drayton and El Paso on video games.

We can end gun violence. Letā€™s start with gun control.


What sort of gun control legislation would you like to see be put into place?


OP, that claim of shootings increased is false. The violence and shootings didnā€™t change in that decade from the previous decade, and in fact, violence has been on the decline. 
WHAT HAS CHANGED is how much media is shoved down your throat. Thats it. The nonstop spam from legacy media of a single event for a month, if not months on end is what changed. It used to be a 5, maybe 10 minute story has now turned into a 4 week ā€œconstant coverageā€ of spewing the same info daily, with nothing added. 
After the early 90s, we saw a sharp decline and its been declining ever since. 
Meanwhile, ownership is at an alltime high, increasing, as if a plethora of armed citizens reduces the audacity of a potential killer to attempt knowing theyā€™ll get capped.
What has also changed is the increase in the absolutely terrible idea of ā€œgun free zonesā€ seeing as approximately 85-95% of these shootings are occuring in these zones. Seems like thatā€™s your problem. 
Hmm, this graph seems to showcase that despite the US owning vastly more gunsā€¦ homicide rate is lower than a hefty chunk of even the non gun ownersā€¦


Iā€™d just like to know how they propose to take our guns. If I got one logical explanation from one of these half wits that didnā€™t include magic or ridiculous gestapo tactics we could have a conversation but, every Fā€™ing time it devolves into name calling, insults, and slander. They simply canā€™t explain how to take the guns away. Not a single one of them has ever responded to me without crass vulgarities and irrational screeching. 



myamberreason said:Ā 
Anyway, guys, why you need THAT many guns? I understand owned a few for protection or legal hunting, but why do you have around 40% of firearms in the world??


Iā€™m sorry, are you implying the Yanks should meet international proportional quotas on guns?


We do own a few for self-defense and hunting.  Itā€™s just that the rest of the world doesnā€™t own very many guns.


The reason we all have so many guns is very simple: logistics. The point of the second amendment is for us, the citizens of the USA, to be ā€œshit your pants, wake up in a cold sweatā€ terrifying to the people running this country, so much so that they involuntarily have second, third, even fourth thoughts about ever violating our rights. The 2nd amendment is the most important and most powerful of all the amendments. Every single right and amendment could taken away, and we could regain them all with that one. And Iā€™m not the only one who recognizes the importance of the 2nd.And it definitely terrifies Beijing.

Iā€™ve said it before and Iā€™ll say it again: I donā€™t have to justify an amount of guns to you any more than I have to justify how many video games or coffee cups I have.
    

        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
    

    

        

            
            

                
                Beijing, Definitely, and Guns: BANG
 BANG
 WE CAN END GUN VIOLENCE.
xphilosoraptorx:

unlimited-shitpost-works:
siryouarebeingmocked:


8lastrat8:

americanā€“support:

kasaron:


allriot-political-tshirts:


American citizens own 40% of all guns in the world. 

Out of more than one billion firearms in the world, American citizens hold 393 million, for a population of roughly 326 million. Thatā€™s a lot of guns!

The last time the US federal government managed to pass laws that limit the spread and use of guns was 25 years ago. It was 1994. The Federal Assault Weapons Ban was temporary. It expired in 2004, resulting in a massive increase in mass shootings across the country. Republicans are running out of excuses, blaming the latest incidents in Drayton and El Paso on video games.

We can end gun violence. Letā€™s start with gun control.


What sort of gun control legislation would you like to see be put into place?


OP, that claim of shootings increased is false. The violence and shootings didnā€™t change in that decade from the previous decade, and in fact, violence has been on the decline. 
WHAT HAS CHANGED is how much media is shoved down your throat. Thats it. The nonstop spam from legacy media of a single event for a month, if not months on end is what changed. It used to be a 5, maybe 10 minute story has now turned into a 4 week ā€œconstant coverageā€ of spewing the same info daily, with nothing added. 
After the early 90s, we saw a sharp decline and its been declining ever since. 
Meanwhile, ownership is at an alltime high, increasing, as if a plethora of armed citizens reduces the audacity of a potential killer to attempt knowing theyā€™ll get capped.
What has also changed is the increase in the absolutely terrible idea of ā€œgun free zonesā€ seeing as approximately 85-95% of these shootings are occuring in these zones. Seems like thatā€™s your problem. 
Hmm, this graph seems to showcase that despite the US owning vastly more gunsā€¦ homicide rate is lower than a hefty chunk of even the non gun ownersā€¦


Iā€™d just like to know how they propose to take our guns. If I got one logical explanation from one of these half wits that didnā€™t include magic or ridiculous gestapo tactics we could have a conversation but, every Fā€™ing time it devolves into name calling, insults, and slander. They simply canā€™t explain how to take the guns away. Not a single one of them has ever responded to me without crass vulgarities and irrational screeching. 



myamberreason said:Ā 
Anyway, guys, why you need THAT many guns? I understand owned a few for protection or legal hunting, but why do you have around 40% of firearms in the world??


Iā€™m sorry, are you implying the Yanks should meet international proportional quotas on guns?


We do own a few for self-defense and hunting.  Itā€™s just that the rest of the world doesnā€™t own very many guns.


The reason we all have so many guns is very simple: logistics. The point of the second amendment is for us, the citizens of the USA, to be ā€œshit your pants, wake up in a cold sweatā€ terrifying to the people running this country, so much so that they involuntarily have second, third, even fourth thoughts about ever violating our rights. The 2nd amendment is the most important and most powerful of all the amendments. Every single right and amendment could taken away, and we could regain them all with that one. And Iā€™m not the only one who recognizes the importance of the 2nd.And it definitely terrifies Beijing.

Iā€™ve said it before and Iā€™ll say it again: I donā€™t have to justify an amount of guns to you any more than I have to justify how many video games or coffee cups I have.
                
            

            
            
xphilosoraptorx:

unlimited-shitpost-works:
siryouarebeingmocked:


8lastrat8:

americanā€“support:

kasaron:


allriot-political-tshirts:


A...

            
            
        

    



            

        

        
        

            

                



            

        

        
        

            

                




    Being Alone, Arguing, and Bad: Alyssa Milano
 @Alyssa_Milano
 Follow
 Ns
 NEWS
 MARIJU
 4:14 PM 18 Apr 2018
 MAKEMAT
 1,593 Retweets 4.735 Likes
 äø»äøŽēŽ‰äø°äø°
 --
libertarirynn:

vaporwavevocap:

cheshireinthemiddle:
napoleonbonerfarte:


cheshireinthemiddle:

pseudopupil:


cheshireinthemiddle:

hardboiledoldman:


cheshireinthemiddle:


hardboiledoldman:


cheshireinthemiddle:
But you knowingly broke the law. You could sleep with a 17 year old and the age of consent of your state can lower the next year. You still broke the law. 
Youā€™re an unfathomably dumb cunt.


At least I have a good argument. 
And since iā€™ve already gone into great detail proving my point, unless you have something constructive to add, move along. 


A sound argument is not a good argument, you dummy. Making a sound argument isnā€™t the same thing as making a good one, and youā€™ve made a bad argument cause youā€™re a dumb as fuck bootlicker.
We all know breaking the law has consequences, doesnā€™t mean we have to think itā€™s morally good, you brain-worm-riddled moron. Something being normal and the accepted reality doesnā€™t make it reasonable or good. Youā€™re not smart and your rhetoric is garbage-tier. Eat shit.


A sound argument is one that is well thought out and covers its bases. Which is what I gave. 
Your counterargument isā€¦insults. 
You personally not agreeing with a law doesnt mean that you can just break it. If youre an immigrant coming from a country with a liwer legal drinking age or age of consent, you can see breaking those laws in the US as harmless. You can think they are stupid laws. They might even change in the future. But if you break them in the US, you will be punished. ā€œI personally dont find an. Issue with this lawā€ is not a defense. 
If you want to do something illegal and think it is unfair, work to have the law changed. Advocate for its change. And abide by the new rules (in this case, get a license, sell only to specific people, and dont sell to children). 
And this isnt slavery. This isnt criminalized homosexuality. This isnt infringing on your right to live. You can wait to get high in this particular method or sell it to others after it has been legalized. It isnt that hard. 

You are such an idiot and coward.Ā ā€œBreaking the law is illegalā€ is the entirety of what youā€™re saying (congrats on your basic baby brain logic) but its still fucking pathetic youā€™re defending a heinous prison system simply because you are pussy who loves authority and pointless contrarianism. Like it IS a stupid law and the point of this comic is that no one should lose years (or any time!) of their life over it.
Ā If the government made a law that jaywalking is a felony youā€™d defend people being locked away only because they ā€œbroke the lawā€. Thats stupid and says more about you than anything. Grow a spine you slug.


Another person who just insults and doesnt read. 
The argument isnt ā€œbreaking the law is illegalā€, but that knowingly breaking the law comes with predictable punishments. 
If you dont agree with a law, you advocate for its change. 
You dont personally get to decide what is and isnt a stupid law. The age of consent in France is 15. And if you live in France, that could seem harmless. But if you immigrated to Japan or the US and started sleeping with 15 year olds, you can argue that it is harmless all you want, but it is still illegal. 
The government has made leaving your preteen or lower child home alone as a form child abuse. You can have your children taken away if you do it too much. I was left alone at 8 years old. All the time. I was fine. The other little kids left alone were fine. We could handle ourselves. We and Our parents saw it as ā€œharmlessā€. That doesnt mean the parents cant be pubished for it. 
ā€œI will break this law because i personally dont like it/think itā€™s harmlessā€ is acceptable to you until it is used on a law that you actually support. 

ā€œmaybe if those jews didnā€™t want to get sent to concentration camps they shouldnā€™t have been jewish in poland.ā€ thatā€™s exactly what you sound like lmao. Iā€™m really not sure what argument youā€™re trying to go for right now?


Oh, iā€™m sorry, I guess you getting high is comparable to persecution now. Your argument can be used to justify breaking literally any law. 
There is a HUGE difference between laws that violate your right to live and laws that you just dont feel like following. 
If you cant see the difference then i feel very sorry for you. 

It is persecution, if there is no victim there is no crime, therefore treating people like criminals without a crime is persecution.

What she said ^

Also forcing people into legal slavery by arresting and imprisoning them for victimless crimes sure as shit sounds like persecution to me.
    

        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
    

    

        

            
            

                
                Being Alone, Arguing, and Bad: Alyssa Milano
 @Alyssa_Milano
 Follow
 Ns
 NEWS
 MARIJU
 4:14 PM 18 Apr 2018
 MAKEMAT
 1,593 Retweets 4.735 Likes
 äø»äøŽēŽ‰äø°äø°
 --
libertarirynn:

vaporwavevocap:

cheshireinthemiddle:
napoleonbonerfarte:


cheshireinthemiddle:

pseudopupil:


cheshireinthemiddle:

hardboiledoldman:


cheshireinthemiddle:


hardboiledoldman:


cheshireinthemiddle:
But you knowingly broke the law. You could sleep with a 17 year old and the age of consent of your state can lower the next year. You still broke the law. 
Youā€™re an unfathomably dumb cunt.


At least I have a good argument. 
And since iā€™ve already gone into great detail proving my point, unless you have something constructive to add, move along. 


A sound argument is not a good argument, you dummy. Making a sound argument isnā€™t the same thing as making a good one, and youā€™ve made a bad argument cause youā€™re a dumb as fuck bootlicker.
We all know breaking the law has consequences, doesnā€™t mean we have to think itā€™s morally good, you brain-worm-riddled moron. Something being normal and the accepted reality doesnā€™t make it reasonable or good. Youā€™re not smart and your rhetoric is garbage-tier. Eat shit.


A sound argument is one that is well thought out and covers its bases. Which is what I gave. 
Your counterargument isā€¦insults. 
You personally not agreeing with a law doesnt mean that you can just break it. If youre an immigrant coming from a country with a liwer legal drinking age or age of consent, you can see breaking those laws in the US as harmless. You can think they are stupid laws. They might even change in the future. But if you break them in the US, you will be punished. ā€œI personally dont find an. Issue with this lawā€ is not a defense. 
If you want to do something illegal and think it is unfair, work to have the law changed. Advocate for its change. And abide by the new rules (in this case, get a license, sell only to specific people, and dont sell to children). 
And this isnt slavery. This isnt criminalized homosexuality. This isnt infringing on your right to live. You can wait to get high in this particular method or sell it to others after it has been legalized. It isnt that hard. 

You are such an idiot and coward.Ā ā€œBreaking the law is illegalā€ is the entirety of what youā€™re saying (congrats on your basic baby brain logic) but its still fucking pathetic youā€™re defending a heinous prison system simply because you are pussy who loves authority and pointless contrarianism. Like it IS a stupid law and the point of this comic is that no one should lose years (or any time!) of their life over it.
Ā If the government made a law that jaywalking is a felony youā€™d defend people being locked away only because they ā€œbroke the lawā€. Thats stupid and says more about you than anything. Grow a spine you slug.


Another person who just insults and doesnt read. 
The argument isnt ā€œbreaking the law is illegalā€, but that knowingly breaking the law comes with predictable punishments. 
If you dont agree with a law, you advocate for its change. 
You dont personally get to decide what is and isnt a stupid law. The age of consent in France is 15. And if you live in France, that could seem harmless. But if you immigrated to Japan or the US and started sleeping with 15 year olds, you can argue that it is harmless all you want, but it is still illegal. 
The government has made leaving your preteen or lower child home alone as a form child abuse. You can have your children taken away if you do it too much. I was left alone at 8 years old. All the time. I was fine. The other little kids left alone were fine. We could handle ourselves. We and Our parents saw it as ā€œharmlessā€. That doesnt mean the parents cant be pubished for it. 
ā€œI will break this law because i personally dont like it/think itā€™s harmlessā€ is acceptable to you until it is used on a law that you actually support. 

ā€œmaybe if those jews didnā€™t want to get sent to concentration camps they shouldnā€™t have been jewish in poland.ā€ thatā€™s exactly what you sound like lmao. Iā€™m really not sure what argument youā€™re trying to go for right now?


Oh, iā€™m sorry, I guess you getting high is comparable to persecution now. Your argument can be used to justify breaking literally any law. 
There is a HUGE difference between laws that violate your right to live and laws that you just dont feel like following. 
If you cant see the difference then i feel very sorry for you. 

It is persecution, if there is no victim there is no crime, therefore treating people like criminals without a crime is persecution.

What she said ^

Also forcing people into legal slavery by arresting and imprisoning them for victimless crimes sure as shit sounds like persecution to me.
                
            

            
            
libertarirynn:

vaporwavevocap:

cheshireinthemiddle:
napoleonbonerfarte:


cheshireinthemiddle:

pseudopupil:


cheshireinthemiddle:

hardb...

            
            
        

    



            

        

        
        

            

                




    Being Alone, Arguing, and Bad: Alyssa Milano
 @Alyssa_Milano
 Follow
 Ns
 NEWS
 MARIJU
 4:14 PM 18 Apr 2018
 MAKEMAT
 1,593 Retweets 4.735 Likes
 äø»äøŽēŽ‰äø°äø°
 --
vaporwavevocap:

cheshireinthemiddle:
napoleonbonerfarte:


cheshireinthemiddle:

pseudopupil:


cheshireinthemiddle:

hardboiledoldman:


cheshireinthemiddle:


hardboiledoldman:


cheshireinthemiddle:
But you knowingly broke the law. You could sleep with a 17 year old and the age of consent of your state can lower the next year. You still broke the law. 
Youā€™re an unfathomably dumb cunt.


At least I have a good argument. 
And since iā€™ve already gone into great detail proving my point, unless you have something constructive to add, move along. 


A sound argument is not a good argument, you dummy. Making a sound argument isnā€™t the same thing as making a good one, and youā€™ve made a bad argument cause youā€™re a dumb as fuck bootlicker.
We all know breaking the law has consequences, doesnā€™t mean we have to think itā€™s morally good, you brain-worm-riddled moron. Something being normal and the accepted reality doesnā€™t make it reasonable or good. Youā€™re not smart and your rhetoric is garbage-tier. Eat shit.


A sound argument is one that is well thought out and covers its bases. Which is what I gave. 
Your counterargument isā€¦insults. 
You personally not agreeing with a law doesnt mean that you can just break it. If youre an immigrant coming from a country with a liwer legal drinking age or age of consent, you can see breaking those laws in the US as harmless. You can think they are stupid laws. They might even change in the future. But if you break them in the US, you will be punished. ā€œI personally dont find an. Issue with this lawā€ is not a defense. 
If you want to do something illegal and think it is unfair, work to have the law changed. Advocate for its change. And abide by the new rules (in this case, get a license, sell only to specific people, and dont sell to children). 
And this isnt slavery. This isnt criminalized homosexuality. This isnt infringing on your right to live. You can wait to get high in this particular method or sell it to others after it has been legalized. It isnt that hard. 

You are such an idiot and coward.Ā ā€œBreaking the law is illegalā€ is the entirety of what youā€™re saying (congrats on your basic baby brain logic) but its still fucking pathetic youā€™re defending a heinous prison system simply because you are pussy who loves authority and pointless contrarianism. Like it IS a stupid law and the point of this comic is that no one should lose years (or any time!) of their life over it.
Ā If the government made a law that jaywalking is a felony youā€™d defend people being locked away only because they ā€œbroke the lawā€. Thats stupid and says more about you than anything. Grow a spine you slug.


Another person who just insults and doesnt read. 
The argument isnt ā€œbreaking the law is illegalā€, but that knowingly breaking the law comes with predictable punishments. 
If you dont agree with a law, you advocate for its change. 
You dont personally get to decide what is and isnt a stupid law. The age of consent in France is 15. And if you live in France, that could seem harmless. But if you immigrated to Japan or the US and started sleeping with 15 year olds, you can argue that it is harmless all you want, but it is still illegal. 
The government has made leaving your preteen or lower child home alone as a form child abuse. You can have your children taken away if you do it too much. I was left alone at 8 years old. All the time. I was fine. The other little kids left alone were fine. We could handle ourselves. We and Our parents saw it as ā€œharmlessā€. That doesnt mean the parents cant be pubished for it. 
ā€œI will break this law because i personally dont like it/think itā€™s harmlessā€ is acceptable to you until it is used on a law that you actually support. 

ā€œmaybe if those jews didnā€™t want to get sent to concentration camps they shouldnā€™t have been jewish in poland.ā€ thatā€™s exactly what you sound like lmao. Iā€™m really not sure what argument youā€™re trying to go for right now?


Oh, iā€™m sorry, I guess you getting high is comparable to persecution now. Your argument can be used to justify breaking literally any law. 
There is a HUGE difference between laws that violate your right to live and laws that you just dont feel like following. 
If you cant see the difference then i feel very sorry for you. 

It is persecution, if there is no victim there is no crime, therefore treating people like criminals without a crime is persecution.

What she said ^
    

        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
    

    

        

            
            

                
                Being Alone, Arguing, and Bad: Alyssa Milano
 @Alyssa_Milano
 Follow
 Ns
 NEWS
 MARIJU
 4:14 PM 18 Apr 2018
 MAKEMAT
 1,593 Retweets 4.735 Likes
 äø»äøŽēŽ‰äø°äø°
 --
vaporwavevocap:

cheshireinthemiddle:
napoleonbonerfarte:


cheshireinthemiddle:

pseudopupil:


cheshireinthemiddle:

hardboiledoldman:


cheshireinthemiddle:


hardboiledoldman:


cheshireinthemiddle:
But you knowingly broke the law. You could sleep with a 17 year old and the age of consent of your state can lower the next year. You still broke the law. 
Youā€™re an unfathomably dumb cunt.


At least I have a good argument. 
And since iā€™ve already gone into great detail proving my point, unless you have something constructive to add, move along. 


A sound argument is not a good argument, you dummy. Making a sound argument isnā€™t the same thing as making a good one, and youā€™ve made a bad argument cause youā€™re a dumb as fuck bootlicker.
We all know breaking the law has consequences, doesnā€™t mean we have to think itā€™s morally good, you brain-worm-riddled moron. Something being normal and the accepted reality doesnā€™t make it reasonable or good. Youā€™re not smart and your rhetoric is garbage-tier. Eat shit.


A sound argument is one that is well thought out and covers its bases. Which is what I gave. 
Your counterargument isā€¦insults. 
You personally not agreeing with a law doesnt mean that you can just break it. If youre an immigrant coming from a country with a liwer legal drinking age or age of consent, you can see breaking those laws in the US as harmless. You can think they are stupid laws. They might even change in the future. But if you break them in the US, you will be punished. ā€œI personally dont find an. Issue with this lawā€ is not a defense. 
If you want to do something illegal and think it is unfair, work to have the law changed. Advocate for its change. And abide by the new rules (in this case, get a license, sell only to specific people, and dont sell to children). 
And this isnt slavery. This isnt criminalized homosexuality. This isnt infringing on your right to live. You can wait to get high in this particular method or sell it to others after it has been legalized. It isnt that hard. 

You are such an idiot and coward.Ā ā€œBreaking the law is illegalā€ is the entirety of what youā€™re saying (congrats on your basic baby brain logic) but its still fucking pathetic youā€™re defending a heinous prison system simply because you are pussy who loves authority and pointless contrarianism. Like it IS a stupid law and the point of this comic is that no one should lose years (or any time!) of their life over it.
Ā If the government made a law that jaywalking is a felony youā€™d defend people being locked away only because they ā€œbroke the lawā€. Thats stupid and says more about you than anything. Grow a spine you slug.


Another person who just insults and doesnt read. 
The argument isnt ā€œbreaking the law is illegalā€, but that knowingly breaking the law comes with predictable punishments. 
If you dont agree with a law, you advocate for its change. 
You dont personally get to decide what is and isnt a stupid law. The age of consent in France is 15. And if you live in France, that could seem harmless. But if you immigrated to Japan or the US and started sleeping with 15 year olds, you can argue that it is harmless all you want, but it is still illegal. 
The government has made leaving your preteen or lower child home alone as a form child abuse. You can have your children taken away if you do it too much. I was left alone at 8 years old. All the time. I was fine. The other little kids left alone were fine. We could handle ourselves. We and Our parents saw it as ā€œharmlessā€. That doesnt mean the parents cant be pubished for it. 
ā€œI will break this law because i personally dont like it/think itā€™s harmlessā€ is acceptable to you until it is used on a law that you actually support. 

ā€œmaybe if those jews didnā€™t want to get sent to concentration camps they shouldnā€™t have been jewish in poland.ā€ thatā€™s exactly what you sound like lmao. Iā€™m really not sure what argument youā€™re trying to go for right now?


Oh, iā€™m sorry, I guess you getting high is comparable to persecution now. Your argument can be used to justify breaking literally any law. 
There is a HUGE difference between laws that violate your right to live and laws that you just dont feel like following. 
If you cant see the difference then i feel very sorry for you. 

It is persecution, if there is no victim there is no crime, therefore treating people like criminals without a crime is persecution.

What she said ^
                
            

            
            
vaporwavevocap:

cheshireinthemiddle:
napoleonbonerfarte:


cheshireinthemiddle:

pseudopupil:


cheshireinthemiddle:

hardboiledoldman:


c...